Intelligence is not a barrier to
holding irrational beliefs.
Just as plenty of religious folks can be quite rational when it comes to economics and decisions about their work, for instance, atheists can
hold irrational beliefs in other areas such as politics, and social values.
Not exact matches
considering that theological
beliefs are
irrational (that is, they obtain despite a lack of evidence) why
hold specific religious / theological views at all?
It causes people to make
irrational decisions and
hold illogical opions that deny facts then those same people try to use their silly
beliefs to pass laws that they want the rest of us to abide by.
========== Atheists are on this board all day every day with one basic message: «people that believe in the God of Abraham are stupid» (the nice version is «people that believe in God are engaging in
holding rational and
irrational beliefs simultaneously, but we wont call them «stupid»)», and you never see this kind of outpouring of incensed righteous indignation from Christians.
Thus, on an ancestral chain model, no one could literally be faulted at time t2, later than t1, for
holding to an
irrational belief at t1.
So what is the rationale for
holding onto this
irrational belief that is without a valid premise?
They are not the
irrational beliefs held by anti-scientific «deniers».