Sentences with phrase «holding means things»

All that tapping and holding means things aren't as seamless as you might like.

Not exact matches

One thing to know: The Super Bowl is being held in US Bank Stadium this season, meaning it's possible that the Vikings could play all the way through the title game without leaving Minneapolis.
More than likely, the main reason holding many people back that giving you a testimonial means they have to do a whole bunch of scary things:
Cash repatriation would still be a net positive for the tech M&A market, Britton said, but it could mean things get put on hold until there is more clarity.
And the experience is almost worse if you try to make things interactive as a lack of visual cues means people either talk over each other or hold back out of uncertainty, leaving gaping chasms of silence.
We (meaning Blue Sky Holding Company) do several things:
The thing that holds many back is the belief that having a small amount to invest means they should wait to get started.
That just means «it says what it says,» and doesn't address the record ownership thing, or the representation about holding shares for a while.
Regulators not only implemented rules to discourage ill - motivated behavior by market participants, but also enforced reforms that have increased the capital which banks must hold, meaning that if things go badly these institutions would have a loss - absorbing buffer.
Any way thanks I am sure you meant to say it when you commented but some thing held you back from saying it, just wonder what it was that held you back from saying it...?
Missouri Synod theologians had traditionally affirmed the inerrancy of the Bible, and, although such a term can mean many things, in practice it meant certain rather specific things: harmonizing of the various biblical narratives; a somewhat ahistorical reading of the Bible in which there was little room for growth or development of theological understanding; a tendency to hold that God would not have used within the Bible literary forms such as myth, legend, or saga; an unwillingness to reckon with possible creativity on the part of the evangelists who tell the story of Jesus in the Gospels or to consider what it might mean that they write that story from a post-Easter perspective; a general reluctance to consider that the canons of historical exactitude which we take as givens might have been different for the biblical authors.
Just to reiterate, I do not hold the views I am criticizing, I am saying that the views you have make no sense to me and I do not understand how you can believe there is meaning in your lives when you believe the things you do.
They hold meaning and give some type of framework to things.
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
Lord, once again I ask: which is the more precious of these two beatitudes, that all things are means through which I can touch you, or that you yourself are so «universal» that I can experience you and lay hold on you in every creature?
He holds the value and meaning of all things seen and unseen for without him nothing is.
But if we can never get a hold of the thing experimentally at all, it is not clear what we mean by it, at least as a concept.
I may think you are wrong but I will never say mean things and hold it against you.
The earth has things about it that are conducive to life taking a hold on it, but it is by no means a slam dunk.
In that spirit, then, Dionysius could affirm that love, as applied to the Godhead, «means a faculty of unifying and conjoining and of producing a special commingling together in the Beautiful and Good... and holds together things of the same order by a mutual connection, and moves the highest to take thought for those below and fixes the inferior in a state which seeks the higher.»
It is the doctrine of the Mystery of God, the divine Word, in whom all things do consist and hold together, who holds the primacy in all things, enfleshed at the end of time as the Heir of the Ages and the final manifestation of the meaning of Creation and of the saving intentions of God for all His creatures, the angels and mankind.
For one thing, that Whitehead's God is in no sense the ground of finite being, as Neville holds, is by no means undisputed.
Their move to a Catholic church was taken as meaning only one thing: that despite the lip - service being paid by the diocese to the teaching that «non-celibate gay people should not be given Communion», the diocese of Westminster was in fact giving its tacit approval and support to a situation in which that was precisely what was happening, in a setting in which the Pope and the teaching of the Church were regarded with hostility and held up to contempt.
Another thing I read few hours ago that this person is be held with out bond... although not sure what it means but think it means nothing found on him breaking the law...!?
A resolved conflict breathes new life into the house, and it's clear that all the verses I was forced to memorize as a kid regarding settling things and not allowing bitterness to take root actually held meaning for real life.
Instead, proponents of «creation - science» hold that the creation of the universe, the earth, living things, and man was accomplished through supernatural means inaccessible to human understanding.
God's natural order can still be grasped at by the common sense of men of good will, but the full truth and meaning of creation, the separation of the sexes and of human nature, will only ever be in part and obscurely viewed when the determined and determining purpose of the mind of God is recognised in creation, holding all things relative to Himself — and to His plan to enter creation as its Lord and King.
I can tell you one thing, Jesus wouldn't have been sitting here preaching a man's right to generate wealth by any means necessary with the only limits being those imposed by the oft - cited though never seen «free market» that the right continues to hold up as the savior to all of our world problems.
I can understand what you mean by the term you use and at the same time can have a different definition for that term and we can still hold a conversation about the thing in question.
But despite intellectual challenges, issues in his personal life and emotional swings, Lewis is ultimately remembered for his writings on faith: Even when it meant putting aside momentary feelings of uncertainty: «Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods... That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods «where they get off,» you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist.»
This means that no branch of knowledge and no person can be complete without Jesus Christ, «All things were created through and for Him... and in Him all things hold together,» (Colossians 1:16 - 17).
One thing there was that he held on to: a fixed conviction that a man who had been executed, who was dead and buried, was alive now, a living person: that so far from that man's death being the end of him, he was Paul's own Lord and Master, the one whom he must follow, trust in and obey if life for him was to have any meaning.
the actors on the stage are suddenly frozen, their posture or gesture transfixed, the audience in an instant is turned to stone, time holds breath, and you and I become a part of this great drama — that of the meanings of things and events, of love and hate, of living and killing — a drama before and beyond time, before even this particular Passion, yet known to us here and now.
As far as when I've told others that I'll pray for them, depending on the situation, I've either done the «state of being» with a sort of «positive thoughts sent their way»... sometimes more of a reflection, a «holding you in my heart» sort of thing... and sometimes, because regardless of what it means to me, I know what it means to the other person, an actual on my knees prayer to god.
In a black church the folks held in slavery by the evil folks are, not illogically, compared to the history of blacks in the USA.I mean who are the evil folks to be compared to?Wright just wants them to repent and stop their evil.If in the Catholic Church 80 % of the folks do nt practice what the Priest says (Or agree apparently) but still attend why would you think that a protestant would take every thing his pastor says as «Gospel»?
King's God isn't a well - meaning weakling, holding our hands and hoping things turn out OK; rather, he's so far above the various adversaries, from Tak to Randall Flagg, that the possibility of their winning passing victories concerns him not at all.
One thing there was that he held on to: a fixed conviction that a man who had been executed, who was dead and buried, was alive now, a living person: that, so far from that man's death being the end of him, he was Paul's own Lord and Master, the one whom he must follow, trust in, and obey if his life was to have any meaning.
This means that as things currently stand, we only have two fit centre backs in Chambers and Holding going into the start of the season and so we could see these two pairing up on the pitch sooner than we think!
While this could mean practically nothing for fans once it actually arrives as a consumer product, the ways in which Disney decides to monetize their current sports holdings could shake things up in the sports streaming world.
I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.
of course im open to being corrected here but isn't Gabriel further in the scheme of things by that i mean further up in pecking order than Holding?
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
One thing that may be holding the deal up, however, is the fact that a clause in the loan deal means that Everton will be forced to pay City a fee if they signed the former Aston Villa man on a permanent contract this summer.
The 3 - 1 lead the Indians held no longer means a thing.
That meant I was not going to a dinner on his fathers best friends arm, That he counted for more than my friends and any one else, And from that second on under his roof he was the final judge and arbiter in all things, that he was tired of blackmail with sex and the next person that held him with a weapon he might kill outright, and if I did nor submit after the hell we put him through he might decide I was worth less than a bugs life, I ran for the door and he shredded my outfit I was begging him that he was going to do something.
And then we underscore all of this by telling them that accidents happen, that people sometimes do things or say things that they don't really mean — either because it's self - directed or a projection of their own insecurities — but it's always best to forgive, move forward and try not to hold onto bad feelings for too long.
There are three zippered pockets located on the Columbia Expedition Ridge Duffle Bag which means you have more places to securely hold your things.
There are people who watch things like this, people who may already have a bias or a poor understanding of homeschooling, and unfairly use it as further fuel... justification to continue to mistrust, misunderstand, or hold animosity towards alternative means of education.
I've allowed myself to accept help when it is offered, whether that means holding my things while I run after my child or helping me get my groceries to the car.
In the first six months of life toys will be used to develop more gross motor control, this means waving the whole arm or leg about and holding things between both hands rather than with individual fingers.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z