Not exact matches
Consumer discretionary (XLY) was another winner among
sectors in Q1, up between 1 percent and 2 percent, helped by a healthy
weighting to Netflix (No. 6
holding by ETF
weight) and Amazon (No. 1
holding in the ETF).
Holdings are market cap -
weighted within
sectors;
sectors are
weighted to align with the actively - managed Janus Triton Fund.
Therefore, investors should be sure that they assess the
holdings of any Financial
sector ETF to ensure it is not too heavily
weighted in Neutral - or - worse - rated stocks.
Holdings,
sector weightings, market capitalization, turnover and portfolio characteristics of individual client portfolios may differ, sometimes significantly, from those shown.
The portfolio is actively managed, so
holdings,
sector weightings and other portfolio characteristics may have changed since the date shown.
The Small - Cap and SMid - Cap Equity strategies are concentrated strategies that are not managed to a benchmark, so there are material differences in characteristics, such as the number of
holdings and
sector and industry
weightings.
The individual
holdings are diversified across economic
sectors; however, the portfolio
sector weights may vary widely from that of the benchmark.
But after looking at the
holdings, I feel that these funds provide much higher oil exposure than I was originally looking for, and I don't like the huge
weightings into the top names in the
sector.
It doesn't have to mirror the market exactly, but it's
weightings in small -, mid - and large - cap
holdings, growth vs. value and different industries and
sectors should generally adhere to those of the market overall.
Holding a cap
weight index means you go up and down with them while equal
sector weight allows you to skim off profits during booms and increase your share in
sectors when they are bargains.
Bond portfolio management strategies based on
sector rotation involve varying the
weight of different types of bonds
held within a portfolio.
I find myself with great dividend payers, but have found that my
sector weighting is very unconventional.For example 5 % Healthcare & 5 % tech, being 23, I feel that those
sectors are going to grow year over year in my lifetime but only
hold a small
holding so far.
To determine allocation effect, we compare the average
weight in each of the 11 GICS ®
sectors held by active large - cap managers relative to the S&P 500 during the measurement period, and the
sector contribution to benchmark return as well as the portfolio return.
But, I will try to balance my
holdings by adding new units in the under
weighted sectors.
Is it tracking a traditional market - cap
weighted index, which
holds each company in an index according to its market
weighting like the S&P 500, or is it trying to make a risk - return trade - off with different
weightings and different
sector exposures?
The Fund will
hold between 100 and 130 high income securities of any market capitalization, agnostic of benchmark geographic or
sector weightings.
As a reflection of the Canadian market, the financials
sector holds 63 %
weight in the index.
Pay attention to the impact that various
holdings have on your style - box positioning and
sector weightings.
Security selection will be driven by
sectors, however, meaning that the
weight of portfolio
holdings will be adjusted between the 10
sectors in the S&P 500 index based on macro trends, earnings potential, and valuation.
The investment management team
holds regular meetings discussing the portfolio with a view to reassess, sell or buy securities and to discuss current cash position as well as
sector and geographic
weighting.
The ETF
holds more than 350 stocks, but because the index it tracks is
weighted by market capitalization, the largest players in the tech
sector play a major role in its overall performance.
But, I will try to balance my
holdings by adding new stocks / bonds in the under
weighted sectors.
However, I won't sell
holdings from over
weighted sector and buy in under
weighted sectors.
Forstrong's Mordy has a neutral
sector weighting in technology and its portfolios
hold no tech - specific ETFs.
If not, they will still probably be somewhat similar because they will likely track the same «segment» or «
sector» of the global market, even though they don't track the same index and therefore may not
hold the same stocks in the same
weightings.
While the attitudes of more corporate miners may have created the impression the
sector itself is shrouded in secrecy, the trope doesn't exactly
hold weight.
Moving real estate out to its own
sector now makes that under -
weight more obvious when investment managers report
holdings by
sector.