Not exact matches
Oddly enough,
teacher preparation programs occasionally argue
against being
held accountable for things like placement rates because they don't believe they have any control over how many of their
teachers receive jobs.
First, I'm not theoretically
against evaluating
teachers or the idea of
holding professionals
accountable.
While many in state capitols and Washington, D.C. are placing bets
against state and national accountability systems that range from No Child Left Behind to Common Core State Standards, the public remains faithful to its long - standing commitment to
hold schools, students and
teachers accountable.
Kathleen M. Cashin, the Regent from Brooklyn, voted
against the change, saying it would
hold teachers accountable for a new standard without providing more training for them to improve.
The first argument
against its use relates to how it might be applied for accountability — that
teachers should not be
held fully
accountable for any one test or data point, given the range of factors and measures involved in student learning.
The Obama administration, with Race to the Top and the waiver process, decided instead to put their full weight behind the new Common Core State Standards, fund the development of new tests set to those standards,
hold teachers individually
accountable for the performance of their own students
against the Common Core State Standards, implement the new tests and urge states to use
teacher evaluations based on test results to fire
teachers whose students did not perform satisfactorily.