On a periodic basis monitor and review
your holdings against these principles.
Not exact matches
Instead of joining in a hue and cry
against a churchman for engaging in this system in which every one of us is implicated, from which even the bishop's salary is derived, or hiding our Christian faces in shame because his hypocritical enemies
hold him up as a «horrible example,» the clear call of Christ is that his followers should make a frontal attack upon the pagan system itself, and demand that our economic order shall give way to an economic order embodying the
principles of the kingdom of God (July 17, 1929).
On Tuesday Mr Scoffield said the case, a simple transaction, raised an issue of
principle since those with deeply -
held religious or philosophical convictions could be compelled to act
against their beliefs.
At present, the most democratic constitution bill ever drafted is being
held hostage by self - serving politicians in the clearest possible demonstration of a fundamental
principle of constitution - making — namely, that politicians should neither be tasked with drafting nor ratifying constitutions because of the risk that they will act
against the public interest.
«I abstained on article 50 because I felt it was wrong in
principle to vote
against, given that we had all voted to
hold the referendum in the first place.
But it would be
against basic investing
principles to allow these
holdings to take a disproportionate amount.
Against that background, the Tribunal observes that there is a growing body of arbitral law, particularly in the context of ICSID arbitrations, which
holds that the
principle of proportionality is applicable to potential breaches of bilateral investment treaty obligations (see paras. 402 - 404).
We're committed to
principles of equality and fair treatment, and will work to
hold accountable any employer who has unfairly discriminated
against you for being part of a protected class.
In Giles v Rhind [2003] 1 BCLC 1, [2003] All ER (D) 340 (Oct) the Court of Appeal
held that there was an exception to the no reflective loss
principle where the defendant had by his own wrongdoing so destroyed or disabled the company that it was unable to pursue its claim
against him.
The Supreme Court also
held that, even if the claimants had in
principle been able to make out a claim in unjust enrichment, such a claim would have been excluded by the Value Added Tax Act 1994, s 80 (7), which sets out arrangements for the supplier to reimburse the consumer, subject to a limitation period, removing the need for the consumer to have a direct remedy
against the defendants.
The plaintiffs do not seek to interrupt the progress of improvements, but they ask to stay revolution; a revolution
against the foundations on which property rests; a revolution which is attempted on the allegation of monopoly: we resist the clamor
against legislative acts which have vested rights in individuals, on
principles of equal justice to the state, and to those who
hold those rights under the provisions of the law.
The judgment confirmed that although ordinarily loan repayments would be brought into account in an action by a lender
against the negligent adviser, indeed this was the position maintained by the dissenting Judge, Lord Justice Davis, the majority of the Court of Appeal
held that this
principle did not apply in this case.
He
held that although the Directive was capable, in
principle, of having direct effect, the MIB was not an emanation of the state such that the Directive could not be enforced directly
against it.