Sentences with phrase «holds as a result of the decisions»

It gives a sense of what the future holds as a result of the decisions made throughout the series.

Not exact matches

«I did not publicly deny the reports that I held bitcoins because the press coverage was favorable and suggested that I had made millions of dollars as a result of my good business decision to accept bitcoin payments,» he added.

Closely held corporations with religious objections to contraceptive coverage were exempt as a result of the Hobby Lobby decision in June 2014, until the Administration issued new regulations in July 2015.

«I did not publicly deny the reports that I held bitcoins because the press coverage was favorable and suggested that I had made millions of dollars as a result of my good business decision to accept bitcoin payments.»

Dell Computer Inc.'s removal from the S&P 500 came as a result of the company's decision to cease being a publicly held company.

Investors should understand ARS, how auctions work, and the potential impact of a decision to either actively bid or passively hold ARS, as well as the potential impact of the actions other auction participants may have on investment results.

Participants took part in a real - time electronic poll which explored their views on a series of issues relating to their profession: Among the results were: over three quarters of BME teachers considered themselves to be ambitious, yet stated they are being held back by racial discrimination, and the attitude of senior colleagues; nearly two - thirds (62 %) of BME teachers felt their school or college was not seriously committed to addressing their professional development needs and aspirations; 63 % of BME teachers said their employers were not committed to ensuring their mental and physical wellbeing at work, with workload cited as the single most negative factor impacting on their wellbeing; the vast majority of BME teachers felt the Government does not respect and value teachers and does not understand the day to day realities of teaching (99 %); three quarters of BME teachers said they were not confident that their headteacher will make professional and fair decisions regarding their future pay.

«If something happens to any one transgender individual out in Puerto Rico as a result of your biased decision,» said Rivera directly to the Senate President, «[you] will be held accountable by us.»

Neighborhood Watch Marketing On Hold: Speaking of appropriate decisions, it may not help the film's marketing effort, but the folks behind the Neighborhood Watch promotional campaign have decided to remove teaser posters and the teaser trailer from movie theaters in Florida as a result of the shooting of Trayvon Martin by a neighborhood watch captain.

As a result of Supreme Court decisions and legal changes to the enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), state and local governments could be held liable if students with disabilities face unnecessary segregation as they prepare for postschool employmenAs a result of Supreme Court decisions and legal changes to the enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), state and local governments could be held liable if students with disabilities face unnecessary segregation as they prepare for postschool employmenas they prepare for postschool employment.

If you are going to be a buy - and - hold investor, it is imperative that the principles of valuation as they relate to earnings (operating results) is understood, respected and investment buy / sell decisions are properly executed accordingly.

(ii) an officer or employee of The Cooper Union who is not employed in The Cooper Union's financial aid office, but who has responsibility with respect to Loans as a result of a position held at The Cooper Union, or an agent who has responsibility with respect to Loans, from performing paid or unpaid service on a board of directors of a Lender, provided that such officers, employees, or agents must recuse themselves from participating in any decision regarding Loans at The Cooper Union; or

(ii) an officer or employee of The Cooper Union who is not employed in The Cooper Union's financial aid office, but who has responsibility with respect to Loans as a result of a position held at The Cooper Union, or an agent who has responsibility with respect to Loans, from performing paid or unpaid service on a board of directors of a Lender, provided that such officers, employees, or agents must recuse themselves from participating in any decision regarding Loans at The Cooper Union; or

The Court of Appeal reversed the trial judge's decision as to the result of the outcome, but the trial judge held that the cause of the litigation may have been the uncertainty of the donor's intention, but the object of that was uncertainty was his alleged inter vivos gift and not his will, and that accordingly the general rule had to prevail that costs should follow the event.

Recent cases include: Axiom Litigation Financing Fund (acting for the «receiver / liquidator» of a Caymans Islands fund: # 110m dispute); Frauntled Management Limited v Featherwood ($ 13m investment dispute before the BVI Court of Appeal); BBX Capital Asset Management v Royal Bank of Canada & Ors ($ 30m Cayman dispute relating to transaction to defraud creditors / sham trusts); Trinity Management Group Ltd v Burke Consolidated Ltd (s. 184I / s.175 BVI dispute); Maruti Holdings PTE Limited v Sinclair Strategies Limited (BVI jurisdictional challenge); QVT Fund & Ors v China Zenix Auto International Limited (s. 184I and s184C BVI dispute: interim injunction) In addition, the international nature of commercial fraud often results in Paul advising in relation to proceedings before off - shore courts such as in VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Nevis.

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».

The decision, which came down Friday, is an important win for the plaintiffs in their efforts to be compensated for monies lost as a result of the «egregious negligence of Coopers in the services it provided to the Montreal - based company, Castor Holdings Ltd.,» says Mark Meland, a partner with Montreal's Fishman Flanz Meland Paquin LLP

''... [T] he $ 8 beer may be a thing of the past in light of the recent decision holding Aramark liable to the tune of $ 100 + million as a result of over-serving a drunken patron.

Since 2004, as a result of the NLRB's Lutheran Heritage Village - Livonia decision, many facially neutral workplace rules and handbook policies have been held to be an unlawful interference with employees» rights protected by the NLRA.

Representation of a law firm to appeal a decision by the Connecticut Superior Court holding that a crime policy issued to a Connecticut law firm provided coverage for a loss suffered as a result of an e-mail scam.

As a result of that decision and several other recent ones, the Court held that the case before it did not raise «an arguable appeal» (para. 14).

The nub was that they followed a consistent line of first instance decisions holding that, in a non-EU-defendant case, a claim in tort may be brought in England if damage is suffered here as a result of personal injuries inflicted abroad.

As a result, this lack of explanation in the Commissioner's reasoning led Justice Moreau to hold that the Commissioner's decision failed to meet the reasonableness standard.

It was held that the court should not intervene unless it is clearly established that the decision to prosecute the defendants came about as a result of a departure from the statutory guidance and there is no rational explanation for that departure; even then, any intervention by the court would be discretionary.

Enmax Energy Corp. v. TransAlta Generation Partnership 2015 ABCA 383 Arbitration — Estoppel Summary: The appellant appealed a chambers judge's decision where he held that the parties to an arbitration were not bound by a prior arbitration award involving the same parties, that a party (in this case, the respondent) was not estopped from taking certain positions in the current arbitration as a result of the prior arbitration decision, and that the doctrines of res judicata and issue estoppel did not apply to arbitration awards.

As a result of this decision, banks may wish to ensure that, so far as possible, documents relating to offshore accounts remain in the offshore jurisdiction and are not held by the UK branch, so that they can not be at risk of falling within the scope of an s 20 noticAs a result of this decision, banks may wish to ensure that, so far as possible, documents relating to offshore accounts remain in the offshore jurisdiction and are not held by the UK branch, so that they can not be at risk of falling within the scope of an s 20 noticas possible, documents relating to offshore accounts remain in the offshore jurisdiction and are not held by the UK branch, so that they can not be at risk of falling within the scope of an s 20 notice.

I did not publicly deny the reports that I held bitcoins because the press coverage was favorable and suggested that I had made millions of dollars as a result of my good business decision to accept bitcoin payments.»

Where that occurs, it can have devastating consequences for the claimant community... native title may prove to be yet another of the prospects held out to indigenous communities where the realisable gain falls short of that originally expected as a result of the decision in Mabo v Queensland (No 2)(1992) 175 CLR 1.

As a result, the NSW Government supports the recognition by Australian law of native title rights held in relation to land by Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people as established in the landmark 1992 Mabo (No. 2) decision of the High Court of AustraliAs a result, the NSW Government supports the recognition by Australian law of native title rights held in relation to land by Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people as established in the landmark 1992 Mabo (No. 2) decision of the High Court of Australias established in the landmark 1992 Mabo (No. 2) decision of the High Court of Australia.

The «independentiste» Boards have held a vote which failed to give the «desired result», have re-entered (half - hearted) re-negotiations starting from a dream - come - true, eat - their - cake - and - have - it - too position (and never conceding much of anything) and now are making blustery statements on abuse - of - process and historic - neglect by members from the Rest - of - CREA and are making bold pronouncements about «quitting» (again) as apart of a demagogic warm - up to a 2nd one - member - one - vote plebiscite that (with hope) will actually be the final decision.