Not exact matches
It met in the Vatican in 1869 - 1870, and its most notable decrees, later promulgated by the Pope, declared «that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine of faith and morals to be
held by the universal Church, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that His Church should be possessed for defining doctrine regarding faith or morals; and that therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church»; and that the Roman Pontiff has «
full and supreme power of
jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which belong to faith and morals, but also in those which relate to the discipline and government of the Church spread throughout the world.»
If any term of this Agreement is
held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then this Agreement, including all of the remaining terms, will remain in
full force and effect as if such invalid or unenforceable term had never been included.
If any one or more of the provisions of this Terms of Service are for any reason
held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Terms of Service will be unimpaired and will remain in
full force and effect.
The Welsh devolution referendum on law - making powers also known as the Referendum on the law - making powers of the National Assembly for Wales was a non-binding referendum
held in Wales on 3 March 2011 on whether the Welsh Assembly should have
full law making powers in the twenty subject areas where it has
jurisdiction.
He says the local District Attorneys have
full jurisdiction, and the State Comptroller, Tom DiNapoli could make what's known as a referral to the Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, and the state legislature could be
holding hearings.
In the event that any of the Terms of Use are
held by a court or other tribunal of competent
jurisdiction to be unenforceable, such provisions shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that these Terms of Use shall otherwise remain in
full force and effect.
If any provision of these terms of service is
held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions, which shall remain in
full force and effect.
If any provision of this Agreement is
held invalid by a court or other tribunal with
jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement, that provision will be deemed to be restated to reflect as nearly as possible the original intentions of the parties in accordance with applicable law, and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in
full force and effect.
If any provision of this Agreement is
held invalid by a court with
jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement, that provision will be deemed to be restated to reflect as nearly as possible the original intentions of the parties in accordance with applicable law, and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in
full force and effect.
In case the Home has a mortgage plus a Home Equity; in case of delinquency; depending on the
jurisdiction, the institution
holding the mortgage has first right to claim
full due followed by the institution lending home equity.
If any provision of these Terms of Use is
held by a court or other tribunal of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in
full force and effect.
If any provision of these Terms of Use is
held by a court or other tribunal of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in
full force and effect.
It was thought that it was contrary to this spirit of «
full faith and credit» (in Morguard's words, sort of) and administrative simplicity to allow defendants to wait in the bushes while the original court
held a trial — even in default of appearance — and then attack
jurisdiction only when the judgment came to be enforced in a place where the defendant had assets.
The Supreme Court of Canada in the seminal Morguard decision
held that the courts in one province should give
full faith and credit to judgments given by a court in another province or territory so long as that court has properly exercised
jurisdiction in the action.
Indeed, the
full court of the ECJ in Opinion 2/15 has already underlined that ISDS rivals with domestic courts and is not part of the domestic judicial system, when it
held that ISDS «removes disputes from the
jurisdiction of the courts of the Member States» (para. 292).
After some confusion concerning an agreement for admission in exchange for admissions, the applicant's new lawyer took the position that the body had no
jurisdiction to
hold a
full hearing, involving verbal evidence, on a registration matter.
If any provision of these terms and conditions is
held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidly shall not affect the validly of the remaining provisions, which shall remain in
full force and effect.
If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of these Terms and Conditions is
held by an arbitrator or court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the rest of the Terms and Conditions shall remain in
full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated.
If any term or provision of this agreement is
held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this agreement shall remain in
full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated.