And it also
shoots holes in his argument — made just yesterday — that it would be inappropriate for him to back anyone in the hotly contested Democratic mayoral primary in New York City because he's registered to vote in Westchester.
Because Matthew needs to be able to recognise a good argument when he sees one; not to pick
factual holes in arguments he already disagrees with because his parents do.
It is helpful to have an objective third party when dealing with issues of conflict - this person can provide unbiased advice and help
see holes in arguments or logic that the couple is often blind to.
Summarizer — closes the debate by summarizing the main points of his or her team's arguments, especially attempts by the opposition to
shoot holes in their arguments.
Therefore you have not poked
any holes in my argument.
And less than ten years later, I had abandoned the label, poked
holes in the arguments I used to make, found the inconsistencies, the hypocrisies.
there are certainly
no holes in that argument.
But unfortunately people who don't have access to open media fail to see
the holes in this argument so many actually believe that no good competition can run against the great leader.
The affidavits from Denno, Joy and Hogan - three of the nine councilors who voted on the agreement - appear to poke
holes in that argument.
«This work is important because it closes
a hole in the argument about whether Neanderthals interbred with humans.
(If the results are flawed, of course, this could also puncture
a hole in that argument.)
There are two
holes in this argument, a two school system has existed for many decades; LA and private (the majority of government ministers seem to have done ok having been schooled through the latter) plus academies and LA schools have and can co-exist quite easily.
The hole in the argument, (the Treasury's not mikes) is that there will be many smaller schools, the odd basket case and most special schools, who will be unattractive to any buisness orientated MAT.
You certainly do nt try to poke
holes in all arguments.
Researchers collect data and make arguments, peer reviewers poke
holes in the argument.
Apart from ignoring the person, that and «You can disagree if you wish» and «You are banned» are the responses you most commonly resort to when the other side has found
a hole in your argument.
It is not a lack of scientific knowledge that makes me a skeptic of some of the current paradigms, it is a familiarity with the «facts» that allows me to see
the holes in the arguments.
Your opponent will always be trying to pick
holes in your argument to tip the balance of probabilities in their favour, so it is important that the expert witnesses testify regarding their expertise and do not provide an opinion that could be classed as conjecture.
In any case, the points I listed, in my opinion, shoots
some holes in your argument.