Sentences with phrase «holy scripture»

I, state the truth (as I see it and as I read it in Holy Scripture) and then I just let the chips fall where they may.

This is satanic way I've ever read an interpretaion of the Holy scripture!

I was forced to do so by the bravado and arrogance of the imagined title «public reader of all Holy Scripture in Leipzig», a title never heard of.

Following the dangerous reference to Antichrist, Luther said with a deep subjectivism which frightened Spalatin: «Daily greater and greater help and support wells up in me by virtue of the authority of Holy Scripture.»

By virtue of being canonized in Holy Scripture, the many pieces of apocalyptic writing in the New Testament, including the Apocalypse of John, have become permanently associated with the cardinal Christian doctrine of the expectation of the Second Coming of Christ, as expressed in the Creed: «He shall come again with glory to judge both the living and the dead and his kingdom shall have no end.»

Remembering God's Mercy draws upon Holy Scripture and the great Catholic spiritual masters — particularly Jesuit saints such as Ignatius of Loyola and Peter Faber — to discuss painful memories through the lens of Christ's Passion.

Imagine my delight and my surprise when I discovered that there is not one biblical injunction anywhere in any of the sixty - six books of Holy Scripture that prohibits working on Sunday — not one.

In the midst of such division, pastors must heed Paul's advice to Timothy: remain steady in the grounding of the holy scripture breathed from God; stand firm in the examples and teachings of those who have gone before, returning to one's foundation; create the time necessary for study and prayer.

God has revealed himself either in the pages of Holy Scripture or in the events which the Bible records; nothing else is needed and anything else diminishes or denies the unique adequacy of biblical revelation.

Thus in contrast with the ancient mythological cultures and with holy scripture outside the Judeo - Christian stream, most of the Old Testament either consists of historical material, or is expressed with due regard to the historical nature of human life.

To many people, especially those brought up in the Reformed tradition, the phrase «the word of God» is taken to denote the words of Holy Scripture.

I love studying Holy Scripture, both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

It is only regarding this centrality that it is legitimate to speak of the unity of Holy Scripture.»

Note that in holy scripture the Sabbath is NOT «the Sabbath of the Jews» but says» [T] he seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God...» Exodus 20:10.

(26) Rogers, in emphasizing the first level, is consistent with his theological mentor, G. C. Berkouwer, who wrote: «Every word about the God - breathed character of Scripture is meaningless if Holy Scripture is not understood as the witness concerning Christ....

It seems to me that any argument for or against the changing nature of God is limited to the interpretation and authority of some holy scripture.

All religious teaching, whether instruction or sermon, faces the danger of presenting a figure of God that is «stylized» according to a specific section or even a single word of Holy Scripture, so that seldom is an integral God - image formed in one's inner polarity.

«Islam is wholly inconsistent with the teaching of the Word of God in Holy Scripture, which is the only rule to direct us.

«Through Holy Scripture, the church's foundational authority, the Lord who possesses all authority authorizes the church to build on that foundation.»

It is the Judeo - Chrjstian belief that, in the words of Holy Scripture, «The earth is the Lord's and all the fullness thereof.»

Its scientific presentation, drawing more fully on the teaching of Holy Scripture, should highlight the lofty vocation of the Christian faithful and their obligation to bring forth fruit in charity for the life of the world.»

There is also a view of historical criticism used by atheists against the Bible being deemed Holy Scripture — after all, the canon excluded historical books that were accepted until the council denounced those books.

This means, according to Allen and Swain, that «pastors may only bind the conscience of the Christian when Holy Scripture so binds, through its clear warrant or by good and necessary inference.»

'' We say, pronounce, sentence, and declare that you, the above - mentioned Galileo, because of the things deduced in the trial and confessed by you as above, have rendered yourself according to this Holy Office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely of having held and believed a doctine which is false and contrary to the divine and Holy Scripture: that the sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west, and the earth moves and is not the center of the world, and that one may hold and defend as probable an opinion after it has been declared and defined contrary to Holy Scripture.»

Please let me know when your holy scripture is at least interactively consistent because obviously the idea of loving the world so much he sent his only begotten son to die is woefully inaccurate.

The books of the Bible officially accepted as Holy Scripture.

Holy Scripture support is exactly not our game.

As the second half of the quote described, the heresy was:»... that the sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west, and the earth moves and is not the center of the world, and that one may hold and defend as probable an opinion after it has been declared and defined contrary to Holy Scripture.»

«The belief that the soul continues its existence after the dissolution of the body is... nowhere expressly taught in Holy Scripture... The belief in the immortality of the soul came to the Jews from contact with Greek thought and chiefly through the philosophy of Plato its principle exponent, who was led to it, through Orphic and Eleusinian mysteries in which Babylonian and Egyptian views were strangely blended» (The Jewish Encyclopedia, article, «Immortality of the Soul»).

Fundamentalists treat Holy Scripture as the starting point of their faith tradition when in fact it is the product: it gathered its authority only after the tradition had started.

Conversely, the Barmen Declaration began with an appeal to the theological ground of union among the confessing churches as «the gospel of Jesus Christ... attested... in Holy Scripture and brought to light again in the Confessions of the Reformation.»

Their respective Holy Scripture has become their object of their faith — their God.

In this age when the culture of modernity has been fast eroding the traditional belief in God, along with the transcendent spiritual world supposedly surrounding him, the conservative devotees of the religious past hold ever more firmly to the most tangible form of the past: Holy Scripture.

Then there are whole sections of Holy Scripture which fundamentalists conveniently ignore.

In accordance with what has been written above, in accordance with the words of the true philosophy, in accordance with the examples and images of nature and above all, in accordance with the testimony of Holy Scripture and the unchallengeable Logos of God in which we must have absolute confidence, your love one has not disappeared, is not lost, has not become zero.

Fundamentalism is the modern phenomenon by which people, perhaps afraid of the uncertainties of the future, and certainly distrustful of the modern world, have raised their Holy Scripture into a tangible idol.

It is sadly ironic that fundamentalism, which prides itself on being Scriptural, turns out to be in complete conflict with one of the chief themes of Holy Scripture, whether Jewish, Christian or Muslim.

Otherwise, the Bible becomes the prisoner of what was once believed to be scientifically true: «In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received.

As each produced its Holy Scripture, there certainly was a tendency for that creative spirit to diminish and for the living faith tradition to become frozen into a static and lifeless form.

When one gives unconditional worship to any visible, tangible thing, even though it is Holy Scripture, it is this commandment which is infringed.

Church history matters because the history of the Church — the new covenant people of God — is the continuation of the divine drama canonized in Holy Scripture and equally «as divinely superintended by the Spirit,» as Kevin J. Vanhoozer put it in his book The Drama of Doctrine.

We treat Holy Scripture like a restaurant menu, picking and choosing what to eat.

What is novel about fundamentalism is not the honouring of Holy Scripture, but the way in which it is done.

There are those who think that heresy is anything that does not agree with their own interpretation of Holy Scripture.

«In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received.

Furthermore, this kind of approach will free us from supposing that because this or that particular description of man's destiny is found stated in this or that particular way in Holy Scripture, we are obliged to accept it as necessarily «the case».

Please tell us what you do not agree with, based on your knowledge of the he Holy Scripture.

What strikes one about these words - all of which denote a process - is that they owe everything to Charles Darwin and nothing to Holy Scripture.

For example, in the fourth book of Father Paul Sarpi's History of the Council of Trent, you will find that in the year 1551 the Papal legates who presided over the Council ordered: «That the Divines ought to confirm their opinions with the holy Scripture, Traditions of the Apostles, sacred and approved Councils, and by the Constitutions and Authorities of the holy Fathers; that they ought to use brevity, and avoid superfluous and unprofitable questions, and perverse contentions....

This inability to listen is equally surprising on the part of intelligent people committed to the principles of sound, scientific exegesis and on the part of believers who profess to rely on the revelation in Holy Scripture.