I did a similar calculation at SkS, so if you want to see my sources, go here (though the ad
hom attacks on SkS here are making me think it's a waste of time to provide references):
This is not an ad
hom attack on Robert, he has offered plenty of evidence of what I have stated within the confines of this thread alone, let alone the many other threads he has commented on here at Climate etc... over the last couple months.
It will be interesting to note your response, if any — will you fall back
on an ad
hom attack, or will you argue your case
on it's merits?
On countless occasions, those who so often try to disrupt comment threads here with a melange of spiteful ad - hom attacks and half - baked pseudo-science (one of them even sent me a vile email offering gratuitous and profoundly offensive medical advice, though he was not a medic, a sure sign of extreme desperation on his part) found themselves attacking official climate scienc
On countless occasions, those who so often try to disrupt comment threads here with a melange of spiteful ad -
hom attacks and half - baked pseudo-science (one of them even sent me a vile email offering gratuitous and profoundly offensive medical advice, though he was not a medic, a sure sign of extreme desperation
on his part) found themselves attacking official climate scienc
on his part) found themselves
attacking official climate science.