Sentences with phrase «home are at higher risk»

People living in a cold home are at higher risk of lung conditions, heart attack, stroke and mental health problems.

American Family Association hate group mouthpiece Bryan Fischer said that gays should not be allowed to parent children because children in same - sex homes are at a higher risk for sexual molestation, citing the deeply flawed Mark Regnerus study and the Jerry Sandusky Penn State abuse case, Right Wing Watch reports.

This is especially true if your home is at high risk for certain threats like wildfires.

However, because mobile homes are at higher risk of damage from strong winds and other severe weather, quotes will be higher for a mobile home versus a traditional home of the same value.

Older homes and brick homes are at higher risk for damage from tremors and earthquakes, as they are prone to cracking and falling debris can easily damage the exterior.

Children who witness violence in their homes are at high risk fo developing distress symptoms (depression, anxiety, impulsivity, sleep problems) and violent behavior (Rosenberg and Rossman 1990; Martinez and Richters 1993).

Recent research shows that boys raised in single - mother homes are at a higher risk of teen pregnancy.

Not exact matches

But even in the case of 23andMe's home DNA kits, some question the morality of telling a customer he is at high risk for Alzheimer's when there's little the person can currently do about it.

Obviously if you are high risk you should be in a hospital, but for healthy moms and babies, why not at least have the choice to birth at home!

I just wonder how many crunchy / granola families would be so forgiving and not bring any kind of case against a healthcare professional who allowed a mother to have a high risk delivery at home / in the bathtub / etc.

Most people that choose to birth at home have only chosen after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of intervention in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate.)

Most people that choose to birth at home have chosen this option after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of interventions in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate, 45 % at some local hospitals).

Most people that choose to birth at home have only chosen after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of interventions in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate.)

Low risk birth in the Netherlands at home with a midwife is more likely to result in a DEAD baby than high risk birth in a hospital with a doctor.

The program was started to help high - risk women who were giving birth at Highland Park Hospital and includes bilingual support, home visits and parent education groups.

Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal births of 77 %, with 35 % of women having a home birth.23 A review of care for women at low risk of complications has shown that continuity of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27 Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.

Previous surgery — If you've had a C - section before or other uterine surgery, you may be at a higher risk of complications and a home birth might not be the best option

For healthy nulliparous women with a low risk pregnancy, the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome seems to be higher for planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric unit

Even if you could close all the education and training gaps, license every midwife, identify and avoid those with crackpot philosophies, and eliminate high - risk candidates, You are still at home.

If something is considered too high - risk for a birth center, the provider shouldn't try to handle it at home.

For nulliparous women, there is some evidence that planning birth at home is associated with a higher risk of an adverse perinatal outcome.

Most studies of homebirth in other countries have found no statistically significant differences in perinatal outcomes between home and hospital births for women at low risk of complications.36, 37,39 However, a recent study in the United States showed poorer neonatal outcomes for births occurring at home or in birth centres.40 A meta - analysis in the same year demonstrated higher perinatal mortality associated with homebirth41 but has been strongly criticised on methodological grounds.5, 42 The Birthplace in England study, 43 the largest prospective cohort study on place of birth for women at low risk of complications, analysed a composite outcome, which included stillbirth and early neonatal death among other serious morbidity.

Researchers reported high overall perinatal mortality in a study of home birth in Australia, 35 qualifying that low risk home births in Australia had good outcomes but that high risk births gave rise to a high rate of avoidable death at home.36 Two prospective studies in North America found positive outcomes for home birth, 23 24 but the studies were not of sufficient size to provide relatively stable perinatal death rates.

«These kids are at high risk, «said Lorraine LaSusa, who in 1983, following the kidnaping and murder of 10 - year - old Jeanine Nicarico of Naperville, launched Kidsline in an effort to fill the void between the time school lets out and the parents get home.

And more importantly, rather than just comparing home vs hospital overall, it compared midwife - led vs OB - led births at home vs hospital (as you should well know, in the Netherlands, low - risk women see a midwife, full stop — you have to be high - risk to see an OB, so hospital births are a combination of low - risk women under midwife care and high - risk women under OB care).

Obstetricians have a hugely important role to play in Irish maternity services particularly in the care of women at high risk of complications, however home births are outside the scope of their practice, they have no working knowledge or expertise in the area and therefore should not be expected to be brought into the process in an ad hoc manner.

4 5 Others have advocated home birth for women at high risk of obstetric complications, 6 7 and trends to abandon risk assessment for home birth are apparent in both Australia8 and the United States.9

The probability of a baby dying from a home birth is approximately twice the probability of a child dying in a car accident at any point from birth to age 25, and ten times as high as the risk of dying in a car accident between birth and age 10.

There is a great review paper by Amos Grunebaum published earlier this year looking at the risk profiles of homebirths that found that high risk patients are being attended at home by CPMs.

Unfortunately, the stories here tend to include high - risk women who were encouraged by (usually) under - qualified midwives to deliver at home.

The 0.5 % death rate of a higher - risk home birth is the same as the probability of a child dying between the ages of 1 and 18 from any cause at all.

Love Makes a Family: I am a full time stay at home mom to my 2 year old son born to us after a high - risk Hyperemesis Gravidarum pregnancy.

Fact: Assisted home births may be beneficial to some women with midwives by their side; however, if you are a high risk pregnancy then you may be advised to give birth at the hospital where facilities are easily accessible to monitor the baby.

For children who are not at high risk for developing a peanut allergy, foods containing the legume can be introduced at home starting at about 6 months, after a healthy baby has started to eat some other solid food, Assa'ad says.

Women who are experiencing high - risk pregnancies (such as those who have preeclampsia or hypertension) may also wish to check their baby's heart rate at home, in order to help monitor their pregnancies better.

The author concluded that deliveries at home attended by CNMs and «other midwives» were associated with higher risks for mortality than deliveries in - hospital by CNMs.

«Two days before my due date, the home - birth doctor I had planned to use decided I was too high risk to deliver at home.

Pregnant women and their partners who are considering where to give birth should be informed that they may be at higher risk of PPH if they plan a hospital birth than if they plan a home birth.

Women and their partners should be advised that the risk of PPH is higher among births planned to take place in hospital compared to births planned to take place at home, but that further research is needed to understand (a) whether the same pattern applies to the more life - threatening categories of PPH, and (b) why hospital birth is associated with increased odds of PPH.

So now you're admitting to having a high risk birth (polyhydramnios) at home, plus 2 «zero risk» and a 34 week preemie at home.

A far higher proportion of women who give birth in hospital are high risk compared to those who give birth at home.

As almost all of the USA premature babies (first cause of neonatal death) are born at a hospital since they are high risk, you should take them out of the Comparison because they are not being born at home.

So, initially a high risk mom may have a worse labor morbidity chance but in the first 24 hours - her baby would be less likely to die at home than it would in the hospital.

That's an awful lot of high risk patients you're treating at home.

To refute this obvious mistruth, she is pointing out what the science actually says — that the perinatal mortality rate for low risk women cared for by midwives, whether at home or at hospital, is higher than the perinatal mortality rate for high risk women cared for by obstetricians in the hospital.

Here's another way of looking at that: The risk is still 5 times higher with home births.

First you say that there are only 0.7 % of women with risk factors... then you list all these high risk births you're attending at home.

Due to various risk factors (which I would never have known about without sonograms) if I had given birth at home, there's a very high probability my son would have been killed or seriously injured.

And this inflammatory use of a «relative percentage risk» rather than relative risk or absolute risk... for example, even if assuming the writer's awkward data is valid, you can to look at infant living rates and see 99.6 % vs 98.4 %, which means there's only a 1.2 % higher risk of bad outcome from at - home birth than hospital.

All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low - risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to high - risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low - risk healthy white women), the infant death rate is actually 6.14 per 1000, which is «300 % higher death rate than at - home births!»