Alternative Asset Opportunities, Avangardco, checklists, CLOs, correlation, European Islamic Investment Bank, FBD Holdings, Fortress Investment Group, German property,
home bias investing, KWG Kommunale Wohnen, Petroneft Resources, portfolio allocation, portfolio performance, quantitative easing, Richland Resources, risk aversion, Sirius Real Estate, Tetragon Financial Group
alternative assets, benchmarking, currency allocation, emerging markets, Eurogeddon, Europe, frontier markets,
home bias investing, portfolio allocation, rationing, thematic investing, UK
biofeedback, black box, fear and greed,
home bias investing, investment checklists, literature, Nudge, portfolio allocation, The Checklist Manifesto, trading, value investing, value - trap
alternative assets, Argentina, Argo Group, Avangardco, Baker's Dozen, diversification, dividend yield, EIIB, frontier markets, hedge funds,
home bias investing, Irish shares, JPMorgan Russian Securities, NAV discount, Petroneft Resources, portfolio allocation, portfolio performance, Renaissance Russia Infrastructure Equities, Richland Resources, Russia, Sirius Real Estate
% of world GDP, Andrew Langford, COR, default, Emerald Isle, Europe, European sovereign debt crisis, Event Driven, Fairfax, FBD Holdings, Greece,
home bias investing, Ireland, Irish value investing, ISEQ, Prem Watsa, Price / Book, Return on Equity, taxes, Thatcher, Total Produce, Trinity Biotech, UK, Wilbur Ross
AIM stocks, Alternative Asset Opportunities, Asta Funding, benchmarking, correlation, fear and greed, hedge funds,
home bias investing, KWG Kommunale Wohnen, Petroneft Resources, portfolio allocation, portfolio performance, Richland Resources, Saga Furs, Tetragon Financial Group, Titanium Asset Management, US Oil & Gas
absolute return, alternative assets, closed - end funds, currency allocation, distressed assets, emerging markets, frontier markets, FX rates,
home bias investing, NAV discount, portfolio allocation, quantitative easing, real assets, special situations, value investing
«We think emerging markets are a great option to help advisers combat their clients»
home bias investing and further diversify their portfolio.»
Not exact matches
Historically, American investors have displayed a strong
home country
bias when it comes to fixed income,
investing more in U.S. bonds than international bonds.
To balance out
home bias and benefit from the ever - changing global economy, I
invest a significant portion in emerging markets.
Canadians who have been wise enough to shrug off the
home - country
bias and
invest in U.S. equities in recent years have reason to celebrate.
This so - called «
home country
bias» starts from the moment most of us begin to
invest.
Many of these funds are managed by U.S. citizens, so they tend to have a U.S.
bias and feel more comfortable
investing their money «at
home» (in fact a famous mutual fund manager, Peter Lynch, had a similar mentality - buy the company behind the stock and what company do we tend to know best?
Historically, American investors have displayed a strong
home country
bias when it comes to fixed income,
investing more in U.S. bonds than international bonds.
Our annual ETF Investor Pulse survey shows that Canadian investors
invest three - quarters of their portfolios domestically, exhibiting a large «
home bias» — the tendency to prefer domestic over global securities.
One of the reasons investors tend to
invest most of their money at
home (
home country
bias) is because they feel comfortable with their knowledge of the political climate.
It's called «
home country
bias» and it is a tendency to
invest in one's
home country, mainly because it is familiar.
It's useful for us to be aware that
home bias is common and is not unique to US investors, but is
home bias a rational approach to
investing?
In general, the experts tend to warn against the «
home bias» of
investing too heavily in the Canadian market, but
investing in Canadian dividend stocks is a special case.
There's nothing worse than seeing someone who's partially / totally unconscious of
home bias (often flagged by the fact they're horrified you
invest, say 3 % in Vietnam, but see nothing at all risky about their 75 % + allocation to their
home market..!?).
[Though I suspect my underlying allocation's still less than the average investor (who buys tech, and / or
invests globally), and obviously a fraction of the insane
home -
bias allocation most US investors maintain.]
The real problem with
home bias is investors who might have say 75 % +
invested in their
home market, and aren't even conscious of the colossal bet / risk they're actually taking...
Even within the US, there is
home bias among investors to the extent that we tend to
invest more in companies that are near to us — perhaps it is a greater flow of informal information.
I mentioned that it wasn't uncommon for Canadians to have extreme
home biases, and many Canadians only
invest in Canadian stocks.