Sentences with phrase «home study plan»

Not exact matches

Sterling spent the next year creating the toy, studying gender differences and cognitive development in children, writing a business plan and doing in - home testing with a prototype with more than 100 boys and girls in three schools and more than 40 homes.

Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar - powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint, and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate, and shows what's possible when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just as a single kernel of corn grows into a plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983, and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off oil, coal, and nuclear and onto renewables — while keeping and even improving our high standard of living

Aetna, the global healthcare leader, announced plans in 2016 to reduce its work - from - home policy, citing studies showing that home - based workers «collaborate less with colleagues.»

I'm currently studying abroad in southern France, and right before returning home to the States, I've planned a 5 - day visit to Paris.

Things are very busy over here — I'm in the throes of bar study crunch time, wedding planning (my mom is a huge help with this though), arranging for movers, and finding a new home in Chicago.

Last Summer, ACOG «leaked» data from a study to be published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology stating that planned home births carried a 2 - 3 fold increase in neonatal death compared with hospital births.

Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study.

The dates of the twelve studies included within the Wax (2010) analysis is also an area of concern, with eight dating prior to the birth certificate data set change that identified planned from unplanned home births.

Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Twelve studies were included in the review, offering a total of 342,056 planned home and 207,551 planned hospital deliveries for analysis (Wax et al, 2010).

Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low - risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003 — 2006: a retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse - midwives: a retrospective descriptive study.

The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists emphasized the results of the Wax study in its official statement on homebirth, siting that «Women inquiring about planned home birth should be informed of its risks and benefits based on recent evidence.

Homebirth and midwifery advocates point with pride to a recent study that showed that homebirth with a midwife in the Netherlands is as safe as hospital birth with a midwife (Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low - risk planned home and hospital births).

In the latest paper discussed in that post, Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study, de Jonge concluded:

We registered with an agency, formulated our plans for an adoption, and completed our home study.

First, a little background on the study, Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

A major study published in the UK (Birthplace in England Collaborative Group, 2011) has examined the risks of planned home births, comparing them against planned deliveries in hospitals and midwife units for low risk women.

I think we can all agree that the quality of research on planned home birth is varied, and proponents and opponents will find flaws with respective studies.

Planned Hospital Birth versus Planned Home Birth Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicPlanned Hospital Birth versus Planned Home Birth Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicPlanned Home Birth Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicatiHome Birth Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicplanned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicatihome birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complicplanned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complications.

Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned home birth in many places can be as safe as planned hospital birth and with less intervention and fewer complications.

Supported by funding from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Professor Vedam conducted a national, mix - methods study on factors leading to divergent attitudes among maternity care providers» regarding planned home birth.

ACNM (2005) offers a position statement specific to homebirth and states, «High quality controlled trials and descriptive studies have established that planned home births achieve excellent perinatal outcomes.

The study adds to the body of large cohort studies of planned home births that have reported on the relative safety of home versus hospital births.

Fransen (2015) makes a few intriguing points: The Midwives Alliance of North American (MANA) identifies a systematic review written within the official «journal» of Lamaze International as one «best available studies on planned home birth and maternal fetal outcomes.»

«There are several significant hurdles which must be overcome if a study is to make a useful contribution to the debate about whether perinatal death is more likely if a home birth is planned or if a hospital birth is planned, and few (if any) readily available data sources can overcome all of these hurdles.

This study also provides further evidence to support the safety of planned home birth.

Study results provide evidence that mortality outcomes in planned home birth are not significantly different compared to planned hospital birth, among 693,592 women with singleton births in the Netherlands.

Her latest effort is Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.

The study was a prospective cohort study with planned place of birth at the start of care in labour as the exposure (home, freestanding midwifery unit, alongside midwifery unit, or obstetric unit).12 Women were included in the group in which they planned to give birth at the start of care in labour regardless of whether they were transferred during labour or immediately after birth.

«Unfortunately, studies which have not differentiated between planned and unplanned home birth or attendance by qualified versus unqualified attendants, and / or that do not clearly define appropriate inclusion criteria, have been used to discredit all home birth.

Steering group — This study was planned and coordinated by Jean Davies, research midwife, Newcastle; Pat Davies, health visitor, Sunderland; Alan Fortune, general practitioner, Alnwick; Linda Hedley, senior midwife, Berwick; Edmund Hey, consultant paediatrician, Newcastle; Barbara Hinchcliffe, health visitor, Hexham; Maureen Hodgson, community midwife, North Durham; Ann Kirkpatrick, midwifery supervisor, Darlington; Jane Lumley, National Childbirth Trust, Hexham; Norma McPherson, community midwife, Barrow in Furness; Diane Packham, Association for the Improvement of Maternity Services, Newcastle; Willie Reid, consultant obstetrician, Carlisle; Marjorie Renwick, regional maternity survey coordinator, Newcastle; Margaret Robinson, community midwife, Cockermouth; Laura Robson, director of midwifery education, Newcastle; Sheila Smithson, community midwife, Middlesbrough; Ann West, senior midwife, Penrith; Margaret Whyte, the Society to Support Home Confinement; Jane Wright, community midwife, Teesside; and Gavin Young, general practitioner, Penrith.

To tackle these issues we carried out a large prospective study of planned home births.

A randomised controlled trial would be the best way to tackle selection bias of mothers who plan a home birth, but a randomised controlled trial in North America is unfeasible given that even in Britain, where home birth has been an incorporated part of the healthcare system for some time, and where cooperation is more feasible, a pilot study failed.31 Prospective cohort studies remain the most comprehensive instruments available.

Views are particularly polarised in the United States, with interventions and costs of hospital births escalating and midwives involved with home births being denied the ability to be lead professionals in hospital, with admitting and discharge privileges.5 Although several Canadian medical societies6 7 and the American Public Health Association8 have adopted policies promoting or acknowledging the viability of home births, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists continues to oppose it.9 Studies on home birth have been criticised if they have been too small to accurately assess perinatal mortality, unable to distinguish planned from unplanned home births accurately, or retrospective with the potential of bias from selective reporting.

Of women in the study who planned further children, 91 % (136/149) said they would opt for a home birth again (including four who were delivered by caesarean section).

The aim of our study was to determine firstly, whether a retrospective linked data study was a viable alternative to such a design using routinely collected data in one Australian state and secondly, to report on the outcomes and interventions for women (and their babies) who planned to give birth in a hospital labour ward, birth centre or at home.

«Kenneth C Johnson and Betty - Anne Daviss's Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America, BMJ 2005; 330:1416 (18 June), found that the outcomes of planned homebirths for low risk mothers were the same as the outcomes of planned hospital births for low risk mothers, with a significantly lower incident of interventions in the homebirth group.»

In recent well - designed studies that captured planned place of birth andused better sources of data, there were no differences in 5 - minute Apgar scores between home and hospital settings (Hutton et al, 2009; Janssen et al, 2009; van der Kooy et al, 2011).

A study published in the British Medical Journal (July 2005) of the outcomes of 5,418 planned home births concluded that homebirth is a reasonable and safe choice for healthy women.

The most recent large scale study comparing outcomes for mother and baby reported in the British Medical Journal last month showed that for women who had previously given birth, adverse outcomes were less common among planned home births (1 per 1,000) than among planned hospital births (2.3 per 1,000).

While the study focused on children from two - parent homes, study authors plan on following up their research by examining what day - to - day actions affect children most.

In this significant study, which analyzed nearly 17,000 planned home births, nearly 96 % of women delivered their babies vaginally, and only 4.5 % required pitocin to start or augment their labor.

These studies were from Australasia, 13 14 Europe, 15 — 18 and the United States.19 Australian planned home births had a perinatal death rate about twice as high as these countries (table 5).

Low participation in population based studies of planned home births is common.

Many studies of American home birth show that planned home birth with a midwife has a perinatal death rate at least triple that of a comparable hospital birth...

The study reviewed the births of nearly 17,000 women and found that, among low - risk women, planned home births result in low rates of birth interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns.

In a previous study where we explored women's preferences for aspects of intrapartum care regarding planned place of birth we reported that women with a preference for a hospital birth — both midwife - led and obstetrician - led — found the possibility of pain relief treatment much more important compared to women with a preference for a home birth [18].

Studies of place of birth have consistently shown lower rates of intervention in labor and birth for women with low - risk pregnancies who planned their birth at home [1 - 7].

de Jonge A, Mesman JA, Manniën J, Zwart JJ, van Dillen J, van Roosmalen J. Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.