Sentences with phrase «hominem insults»

She didn't even resort to ad hominem insults as you did @Christina.

Not exact matches

Brigitte, you literally insulted my own remarks and claim that a correct statement of ignorance on your part is an ad hominem.

«You christians can always come up with a way to abandon your own argument (once it's been destroyed) and instead ad hominem or point to insults or the color of the person's hair, or the way they dress, or who they s c r e w..

Third, the reason Colin's arguments are ad hominems is because they try to refute religion / Catholicism by * gasp * insulting them, not by showing how and they're wrong in a meaningful sense.

But resorting to the insults and illogical ad hominem doesn't help anything.

While I may use insulting language at times, I in no way say your argument is invalid because of those things, so your ad hominem claim is false.

Insulting someone is only an ad hominem if it formulates the basis of an argument.

Insulting someone is not an ad hominem.

, he was trying to insult atheists by using a borderline ad hominem.

OK, yes there is a subtle distinction between argumentum ad hominem and pure personal insult.

Please do not confuse personal insults with argumentum ad hominem.

I do see this as essentially indistinguishable from insult and is different to argumentum ad hominem.

Hepcat, Your incessant insults show that you subscribe to ad hominem argument, more evidence of weak critical thinking skills.

In light of that, I'm disappointed (if not surprised) that most of the responses I've seen to Biggs and Richwine have been ad hominem, with Duncan declaring in the Huffington Post that the study «insults teachers and demeans the profession.»

V: The most convincing evidence for the validity of Booker's argument can be found right here on this blog, where the vast majority of responses to ANYTHING posted by ANYONE expressing skepticism of the mainstream view is dismissed with insults and ad hominem attacks, in perfect accordance with the «group think» paradigm.

The many ad hominems and personal insults directed at me only weaken your case, folks.

Perhaps Wikipedia can help Gavin understand what ad hom means:» Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim.»

Instead you stated a number of slurs and insults to demean him and therefore hopefully make people doubt his statements concerning JOS.. That is what ad hominem is, you attack the person to try and show he is wrong rather than present evidence of his wrong doing.

You might wish to continue reading down the list of rules, as you would appear to be in violation of both # 2 («No ad hominem attacks, slurs or personal insults») and # 3 («Snarkiness is not appreciated here»).

It's been your choice to incorporate ad hominem attacks, slurs and personal insults in your comments.

Insults, ad hominems and untruths that come along with the package just mean I don't have to visit some places anymore.

Insulting someone is not an ad hominem.

More ad hominem and broad brush insults.

They claim that there are numerous «ad hominem» (in quotes as this term seems to be the most inaccurately used term of late) attacks, insults, etc..

You also demonstrate the usual AGW supporters» propensity for ad hominem attacks, intemperate language, undergraduate - level insults and a desire to shut down criticism of your agenda and methods by any means possible.

Above, I have supplied but a small sample of Monckton's ad hominem invective which goes beyond «insults» and represents in fact unspeakably reprehensible slander against the whole climate science community.

Your specialty seems to be more in the realm of insult, dismissal and ad hominem attack than actual scientific analysis.

If people disagree they should argue against Philips» point, an not insult her and themselves with an ad hominem attack.