«People need to understand that, just because people choose to engage in
homosexual behaviour does not mean people choose to have homosexual feelings.
Not exact matches
ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that
homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to
do some work to reference a credible study.
What Paul is
doing is tying this
homosexual behaviour that he's talking about with idolatry.
Several African leaders are engaging in crude majoritarianism — removing term limits on the presidency or expanding penalties against
homosexual behaviour, as Uganda's president Yoweri Museveni
did on February 24th.
A 2010 Supreme Court ruling stated that «to compel a
homosexual person to pretend that his sexuality
does not exist or suppress the
behaviour by which to manifest itself is to deny his fundamental right to be who he is.»
If it's wrong to exclude
homosexuals because the powers that be disapprove of their
behaviour as «wrong» why is it permissible to
do the same thing to TWU graduates (who, note, aren't even responsible for the «wrongful» actions of TWU).
Does the bible condemn
homosexual behaviour as a sin?