Sentences with phrase «homosexual couples in»

The particular survey analyzed for that paper oversampled homosexual couples, who comprised 16 % of the sample.10 The homosexual couples in the survey were more likely to have met online, and naturally, less likely to have gotten married, given that, at least at the time that data were collected, they could not legally do so in most states.

Among Theresa May's tactics for sounding reasonable was to pretend to think that what we were really worried about was whether or not we would have to «marry» homosexual couples in Church:

Not exact matches

So the lesbian couple who left sex far behind them aren't in sin even though they're in a long term committed love relationship and the two elderly gentlemen who no longer have sex are also not in sin, and yet these are homosexual relationships between people who choose to share their lives.

It is not fair, for example, to compel a child being raised by a gay couple to attend a school in which the teachers say homosexual practice is sin.

The adoption bill permitted homosexual couples jointly to adopt and in another strike against the status of marriage also allowed unmarried couples to adopt.

The Civil Partnership Act, passed in November 2004, raised homosexual relationships to the same status as marriage by granting the same rights to couples entering a civil partnership as to spouses entering marriage.

Even the questions concerning the pastoral care of divorced and civilly remarried Catholics, and of homosexual couples — both topics of heated debate at last October's Synod of Bishops — are in the end based on theological foundations, and deal with the application of doctrine.

The argument that is being debated now falls, in terms of some of its aspects (not cohabitation in general so much as male homosexual couples specifically), within limits that are held to be inviolable.

In «Courting Cowardice,» published this week in the New York Times, Maureen Dowd attacks the natural law argument that since marriage is for procreation, homosexual couples are de facto incapable of being marrieIn «Courting Cowardice,» published this week in the New York Times, Maureen Dowd attacks the natural law argument that since marriage is for procreation, homosexual couples are de facto incapable of being marriein the New York Times, Maureen Dowd attacks the natural law argument that since marriage is for procreation, homosexual couples are de facto incapable of being married.

Olson also invoked «fundamental rights» and was queried by Justice Scalia as to just exactly when it became unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage: 1791 with the Bill of Rights, 1868 with the 14th Amendment, or some other date, perhaps after the Court declined in 1971 to review a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding opposite - sex marriage requirements?

He would show up in a church on a Sunday when a homosexual couple visits the church, and Jesus would stand up and ask, «What do you think, should homosexuals be allowed to get married, or not?»

The question before us was whether the states would be obliged to honor the marriage of homosexual couples if the courts in Hawaii delivered to the country that unsolicited gift.

Homosexual couples simply can not perform a unitive act (which I defined in a previous comment).

The Civil Partnership Act was passed in 2004 (and came into force in 2005), giving homosexual couples the right to have a civil ceremony that gave them most — but not all — of the legal rights given to married couples.

I think he would be in the same boat as the homosexual couple that continuously practices sexual relations.

A current campaign has focused on the need to ban the adoption of Russian orphans by American couples: Pravda has been running stories about how these children may end up in lesbian or homosexual households.

If Jesus gave special status in his day to persons who do not procreate, on what grounds do churches today treat modern eunuchs — single people, homosexuals, and childless couples — like outcasts?

Homosexual couples who want to commit themselves to a monogamous lifelong relationship find themselves in the same situation as anyone else who cohabits without benefit of marriage.

Did not Jacques Derrida, the master of postmodern deconstructionism, propose in an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde, shortly before his death in 2004, the elimination of the word «marriage» from the French civil code so as to resolve the issue of the juridical status of homosexual couples?

st Corinthians 6:9 - 10 — the word homosexual was added later by a prejudice scribe, most scholars will tell you it's about male prostitution and nothing in there is about the saved long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

We saw this truncated view of First Amendment freedoms several years ago when Catholic adoption agencies in several states were ordered to place children with homosexual couples, refused, and closed down.

I had to explain to them that anal sex was not a purely homosexual t hing but something many heterosexual couples did, that many homosexuals don't even engage in anal sex and most gay women didn't, that anal sex wasn't necessarily dirty, that many Christians don't consider anal sex to be a sin.

Or again, if the male couple does not wish to enter into such a «partnership» with a lesbian couple, the male homosexuals can make use of the gestation services that can be provided, but only in certain foreign countries — which raises the question of the recognition of the child's rights upon the child's return to France.

With this aim in mind, homosexual marriage and the right to adoption for same - sex couples appear as nothing more than a means for exploding the foundations of society, making possible all kinds of unions, finally liberated from an ancestral morality, and therefore definitively doing away with the very notion of sexual difference.

This new term, created in order to establish the principle of a homosexual parental couple and to promote the legal option of giving a child two «parents» of the same sex, is a fictitious invention.

http://youtu.be/ShwT6Qu9dZA Homo Baby Boom by Anna Boluda Ground - breaking legal changes in Spain in 2005 (same - sex marriage and adoption for homosexual couples) changed the lives of two - mom and two - dad families.

Recently there was a parliamentary decision in Portugal that approved a referendum to the co-adoption and adoption by homosexual couples (already allowed to marry).

The third partner in Germany's governing coalition, the Liberal Democrats, have long been fighting for tax equality for homosexual couples.

He goes on to say, «Article 9 of the Charter simply leaves it to States to decide whether they wish to afford homosexual couples the right to marry» — and this in the context of a decision about civil, not religious marriage.

«Peter and Rosemary [sic] Bull lost a court case in Bristol, which was brought by two homosexual men who took exception because the couple refused to allow them to sleep in the same bed.

In a letter to all cabinet ministers, he wrote: «Catholic teaching about the foundations of family life, a teaching shared not only by other Christian churches but also other faiths, means that Catholic adoption agencies would not be able to recruit and consider homosexual couples as potential adoptive parents.

This meant Catholic adoption agencies had to allow homosexual couples to adopt children in their care, although many agencies claimed they would shut down before they submitted to the legislation.

BAAD is a performance space that supports diversity, free speech and expression — and is run by an openly homosexual couple who are well - respected and loved by the very community they live and work in.

[93] He also voted in favour of allowing unmarried heterosexual and homosexual couples to adopt, [94] and for lowering the age of consent for gay sex to 16.

Tim Montgomerie valiantly tried to explain the sensible party policy that «will recognise marriage in the tax system and give fairness to same - sex couples» but for certain ConservativeHome contributors «Pink = gay = New Labour» and all that was bad about Tony Blair's homosexual rights agenda.

Proposal 8 was put on the ballot in response to a decision in May by the California Supreme Court, which ordered the state to begin processing marriage licenses for same - sex couples... Advocates of same - sex marriage in New York have found a loyal supporter in Mr. Paterson, who directed all state agencies earlier this year to recognize marriages between homosexual couples that were performed outside the state.»

But the brains of the homosexual couples, in which each partner was a primary caregiver, told a different story.

The mothers, their husbands, and the homosexual father - father couples all showed the activation of what the researchers term a «parenting network» that incorporated two linked but separate pathways in the brain.

The gay Web sites of dating created in line of the thousands of couples homosexual each year.

I find eHarmony's exclusion of homosexuals almost as appalling as the notion of them excluding people who've been married a couple of times... because the assumption is they never will be happy in a relationship.

eHarmony, whose founder Dr. Neil Clark Warren is an Evangelical Christian, was sued in mid-2007 by a homosexual couple claiming the company is in violation of a California state law which bans discrimination based on sexual orientation because it does not offer matchmaking services to homosexual couples.

In Israel, in the secular community, dating is very common amongst both heterosexual and homosexual coupleIn Israel, in the secular community, dating is very common amongst both heterosexual and homosexual couplein the secular community, dating is very common amongst both heterosexual and homosexual couples.

Regarding the tolerance levels of the OkInterracial.com, we can also underscore the fact that it actually does keep itself in pace with the globalisation because it does recognise and provide equal opportunities for the same sex couples and homosexual people.

Another audacious move from Russell, touching on controversial topics like homosexual couples adopting children and drug use; however, such themes are weaved into the story in such a manner that they organically blend within the characters» world.

Douglas has been here before in another tale of familial dysfunction, The War of the Roses, and Brooks has never really been anywhere else; the picture, paced like a trip - hammer by director Andrew Fleming, only really fails in its drab newlywed couple and a passel of homosexual gags that are badly dated and bordering on unkind.

And after publically coming out of the closet, one homosexual couple is finally able to pursue their relationship in the open.

It's a dramatisation of the Leopold - Loeb murder case, which also served as the basis for Hitchcock's Rope (1948) and Richard Fleischer's Compulsion (1959), in which a couple of languidly decadent Jewish homosexuals take to consummating their passion by murdering an arbitrarily - chosen small boy.

The Erics at Nightmare Mode had a couple of posts this week, with Eric Lockaby writing the third part of his «Your Homosexual Lover Is In Another Castle» series (I think this is one that needs to be read from the beginning), and our own Eric Swain writes to argue that «Atmosphere is not enough», comparing both Limbo and Another World.

He invested in the health care system, banned junk food in schools, prohibited smoking just about anywhere (including private cars if children under 15 are in them), removed taxes on bikes, brought in free immunizations, protected boreal forests, instituted wine and liquor bottle deposit returns, changed the definition of marriage to include homosexual couples.

We also practice family law, acting in the interests of minors, couples and their relations, including homosexual relationships.