Sentences with phrase «honest debates like»

«Rep. Maffei has already agreed to hold fair and honest debates like the ones he participated in during the 2012 campaign that aired on every broadcast station and our team is in the process of finalizing dates and details for debates this fall,» Miller said.

Not exact matches

An honest analysis with some conclusions (not like I don't agree with most of them) which can open a real debate here.
Personally, I welcome — this being a debate site - real people with real fan opinions and have no intention of saying less than I mean, since to me that is hypocritical at worst or sitting on the fence at best, in true Alan Smith style (as opposed to fine proper and honest, as they see it, pundits like NEVILLE, CARRAGHER AND SOUNESS, who are above all honest and earn their corn - unlike Walcott - by doing the job they are paid to do.)
Most dyed in the wool football fans I have ever met whether from Leeds, Millwall, North Korea (though I admit to not actually meeting any from NK face since the 1966 World Cup in England when North Korea played in it) and esp Arsenal, like and appreciate honest, to the point, passionate debate from other knowledgeable and attending fans.
If I'm perfectly honest, I'm dreading the weeks of tedious technical debate approaching me, like some monstrous argument whale.
I believe Sen. Perkins, like I am, is happy to meet the challenge head on, to have honest and up - front debates about the issues and let the voters decide.»
That's why we need to have a more honest debate about issues like this, something I'm sure you as a writer can appreciate.
The dogged determination of realclimate to inform and encourage intellectually honest debate serves as a model of what opinion columns might look like in an alternate universe where politicians and the press work with science rather than against it.
And then there's the issue of hypocrisy when, as observed earlier by Judith Curry, «employees of green advocacy groups can participate as authors of the IPCC reports (without apparent criticism), but a non-advocate scientist [like Lennart Bengtsson] can not participate in a (non-green) think tank without censure from scientist colleagues... Honest brokers are to be preferred over advocates; but the real problem arises when advocates seek to stifle scientific and policy debates
With the likes of Al Gore running around in a near panic, pushing his awful Chicken Little film, honest scientific debate on the subject has become all but impossible.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented: Justin Pulliam — Report at WUWT — What honest debate looks like.
Until then, relying on authorities «like the IPCC, the National Academy of Sciences, etc.» is offensive to all honest scientists (including Dr Meir) who engage in the scientific debate.
I'm not sure why you or we even bother with the likes of Monkton, Pilmer etc, everything I've seen and heard is they over inflate their own credentials on the topic, unresearched or fake claims about the science, avoid and duck honest debate about their own positions.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z