This loss of interest in school tends to happen at around third grade, the same time that «
hothouse children» start to lose their advantages over other children, when other children start to catch up.
Not exact matches
Debate continues about the validity of these findings, but there is no denying that these programs operated in a far different social and demographic setting than programs today and that they were «
hothouse» programs: Run by top - notch specialists, the programs served fewer than 200
children, cost at least $ 15,000 per
child per year in today's dollars, often involved multiple years of services, had well - trained teachers, and instructed parents on effective
child rearing.
The Abecedarian Project was not a one - time
hothouse program; it was immediately replicated with a new group of similar
children (in Project CARE) who demonstrated equal benefits throughout their school years and early adulthood.
The University of Maryland's Douglas Besharov calls them «
hothouse programs,» noting that they were «run by top - notch specialists,... served fewer than 200
children, cost at least $ 15,000 per
child per year in today's dollars, often involved multiple years of services, had well - trained teachers, and instructed parents on effective
child - rearing.
It's crucial to note, however, that Heckman actually confines himself to disadvantaged
children, and that the evidence he cites is based on analyses from the Perry - style «
hothouse» programs.
Studies of modern, scaled - up programs that intend to impact long - term
child development find, unlike the studies of small
hothouse programs from the last century, that improvements in
children's measurable skills and dispositions found at the end of participation in such programs usually fade away entirely by the time
children are in the first few grades of elementary school.