I think there is potentially a very interesting economic / green
house gas argument to be made here.
Not exact matches
One big challenge to U.S. efforts to curb greenhouse
gas emissions comes this week, as a federal circuit court hears
arguments over a challenge to the White
House's major climate change initiative, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) regulations targeting emissions from power plants.
Let me explain my
arguments a bit better: 1) In Feichter et al. 2004 we describe a modelling study were we run the climate model twice: One run is with estimates of present day anthropogenic and natural aerosols and green
house gases (called present - day scenario ~ 1985).
(the only thing you will need to get a professional in to do is your Electricity and your
Gas Plumbing) so there really is no
argument about how much the «those builders who are making a living building tiny
houses» charge, as you are the Builder not someone else.
Two
arguments I have seen are offsets of imports and reduction in green
house gases.