Not exact matches
One that Krysia suggested though was that we go to the hospital antenatal classes too so that we could get a picture of
how they expected
labour and birth to progress and so that we would know what their
policies were.
Chaired by NASUWT President Geoff Branner, the meeting at the
Labour Party Conference in Manchester highlighted
how savage economic
policies are wreaking havoc on children's education.
In the week when David Cameron told
Labour it had been taking «
policy - changing substances», the first PMQs in what felt like a decade revealed just
how addicted MPs are to partisanship.
It is an example of a European party with hard left
policies winning votes, and comparisons with UK
Labour underline just
how radical Podemos actually is.
In a recent blog post for (the appropriately titled) Conservative Home, the
Labour party's
Policy Co-Ordinator, Jon Cruddas MP (also a contributor to The
Labour Tradition), reflects on Scruton's new book,
How to be a Conservative: he describes his Conservatism as a love of home.
However, when these
policies are associated with
Labour, there is a notable drop in support, with the immediate reaction being «
how will they pay for it all?»
Although it is not terribly clear what the actual mechanics of the
policy of a potential
Labour government would be (ie they have a lot of ideas on what they want to achieve but not
how to achieve it) it seems likely that they would adopt a much more interventionist approach.
Labour making jokes about
how or what or which school people went to or was he air brushed, nothing about the real problems no
policies.
Whilst there are some ways in which I think
Labour and the Lib Dems could work to each other's benefit at a national
policy level I just can not imagine
how this would effect the dynamics of local politics, as others have pointed out.
How is it that
Labour can oppose many of the cuts being made by the Conservative - led coalition and promise to spend billions on new
policies?
Today I have published a paper with the Centre for
Policy Studies that sets out
how the
Labour Government has wrecked our country's finances.
The fact that anyone would ever simply assumes that the debate about
Labour and its leadership is a debate solely or mostly about
policy only shows
how unusual — well, weird — people active in politics tend to be.
There is frustration among some
Labour policy leaders at Miliband's reluctance to embrace more of the report, designed to show
how the left set out a redistributionist agenda in the post-crash world.
Comparing
how Conservative governments dealt with Rolls Royce Aeroengines and
how the Blair government just left Marconi to sink tells us a lot about New
Labour's industrial
policy.
Labour under Corbyn can expect further gains by setting out its own positive
policies detailing
how it intends to raise people's living standards.
The question of
how far the candidates should renounce the
policies of New
Labour has become one of the central themes of the contest.
September 2017, LSE British Politics and
Policy blog:
How the
Labour vote reflects a values - based realignment of the British electorate
And this history is important precisely because it demonstrates, as with the later «education, education, education» nonsense,
how New
Labour was, right from the very beginning, much more interested in importing salesmanship from abroad than in
policy needs at home.
Unions should no longer have such a large say in
how Labour party
policy is formulated, a former T&G leader has suggested.
Labour first suggested it would back the campaign for a time limit on detention last month but the party's immigration initiative today — which otherwise is full of «tough on immigration»
policies — confirms
how the party will approach the issue.
Guardian - Talk about
how Labour Stole Tory
Policies.
The former
Labour MP Katy Clark, an ally of Corbyn who is now the
Labour leader's political secretary, will lead a «party democracy review» to make the case for major changes to
how the party elects leaders, selects MPs and forms
policy.
What really struck me was
how feminised the
Labour policy agenda has become, and what powerful evidence it provides for the shift in perspective that comes from having a significant body of women at the top of the party.
So,
how does Carwyn and his Team Druid justify yet another manic departure from Westminster
Labour policy?
Can I firstly completely support David Pavett's reply to John Penney.Indeed I find it amazing that someone (John) with a sophisticated understanding of the
policies Labour needs to develop has no understanding at all of
how to get
Labour in a position to implement those
policies.Indeed you fall at the first hurdle, by accepting that
Labour can not win in 2020 following a major split.
The
policy the public are looking for is not
how far
Labour can out - tory the Tories over austerity, but rather a
policy of growth and hope for the future.
Grayling spent the day making a speech about
how trade unions were influencing
Labour party
policy.
Most of this speech has been about
how the
Labour Party makes
policy.
Ed Balls» former
policy chief has questioned
how John McDonnell will achieve a radical alternative to austerity after the shadow chancellor's speech to the
Labour conference.
His prominence was due to an interview with
Labour Shadow Cabinet Minster Diane Abbot, who, under pressure to answer questions about
how her party would fund an additional 10,000 police officers, could not credibly explain
how much the
policy would cost.
So far I've collected your ideas for the best doorstep Tory
policies; the best attack lines on
Labour;
how best to describe our economic
policy; and
how to appeal to Lib / Con waverers.
We hope that she, her colleagues in Government, and those in the
Labour party will take the opportunity over the next 10 months to consider
how the next government will deliver rural
policy.
And their reasoning was revealed by none other than Blair's polling guru Phillip Gould, who described
how he argued that the 1989
Policy Review proposals which shifted
Labour to the right, should not be introduced on a piecemeal basis, as was being mooted as a way of minimising opposition but to»... make one big - bang presentation... Dissent in these circumstances did not reduce our electoral appeal, but heightened it.
But the Conservatives said Ms Abbott had «floundered» when pressed over
how the
policy would be paid for and accused
Labour of already pledging to spend the capital gains tax money on schools, welfare and the arts.
Respondents wouldn't know
how many MPs went in each split, who would be the leader of the anti-Corbyn
Labour faction or what specific
policies the two factions would propose.
How is it possible that
Labour should put in such a poor performance on the EU in terms of its
policies, broadcasts and printed material without this leading to some critical reflection?
PoliticsHome revealed
how Labour MPs were angry that the party had not set up a
policy commission to specifically look at Brexit.
«That this House notes that the Government regulation implementing Section 75 of the Health and Social Care Act contradicts previous Ministerial assurances that NHS commissioners should decide when and
how competition should be used to serve patient interests; acknowledges that, although the last
Labour Government rolled out the red carpet to private companies to make profits from NHS services, believes that patients come before profits in our NHS; and therefore calls on HM Government to withdraw SI 257, go back to the drawing board and draw up a
policy which supports an integrated NHS which encourages collaboration in the interest of patient care rather than a fragmented service driven by profit.»
Please join us to hear more about
how Labour will take urban
policy forward in the next five years.
Yet while Corbyn listed at length the achievements of
Labour councils across the country, there was a distinct lack of
policies to help those councils make their own decisions about
how to meet the challenges they face (housing aside).
Explore the different teams within
Labour and
how we make
policy.
In other words, free education isn't just a
policy, it's a whole new philosophy of
how Labour should behave towards vested interests, private companies and unaccountable power when it is government.
Corbyn and his close allies are discussing
how to manage the expected rebellion among
Labour MPs — including some on the frontbench — against the party's
policy of not frustrating Brexit.
Continuing that theme, the 2015 manifesto's welfare pledges revolve around explaining
how the SNP would exert its influence on this
policy area if involved in supporting a minority
Labour government.
Research for the Centre for
Policy Studies by Conservative MP Philip Dunne has revealed
how Gordon Brown has used his control of the nation's purse strings to tilt the growth of funding towards urban Britain - much of it
Labour's heartlands.
A senior
Labour source said: «This raises serious questions about Andrew Lansley's judgement and it is difficult to see
how he can continue on in his role as shadow health secretary when it would appear that a private health care company is helping to fund the development of Tory healthy
policy.
Labour needs a broader offer, where
policies like repeal of the bedroom tax sit within a prospectus that shows
how everyone will benefit from a
Labour government.
[citation needed] In a speech two days later Mrs. Thatcher attacked
Labour's defence
policy as a programme for «defeat, surrender, occupation, and finally, prolonged guerrilla fighting... I do not understand
how anyone who aspires to Government can treat the defence of our country so lightly.»
Policies - they need binding together as a theme and the issue of
how / when to announce the big
policy ideas needs resolving because it appears we have been caught in the headlights over
how to deal with
Labour nicking our ideas or whether to get on with it anyway.
However, time and time again we hear of
how the Welsh
Labour Government simply isn't doing enough to allow this
policy to reach its full potential.