Sentences with phrase «how accusers»

They yammer on and on about how accusers turn out to be liars and won't someone PLEASE think of the man.

Repeatedly, a series of particularly egregious complaints of sexual harassment or rape has led the Legislature to a watershed moment of sorts, producing much - needed reform in how accusers are treated and how their complaints are handled.

Women who were ready to speak out retreated when they saw how the accusers who came before them were treated.

Not exact matches

«Youtube will ALWAYS side with the accuser regardless of how many false claims they have made, there is no punishment for this,» one Redditor wrote.

It seems the drum beat is all about how bad the church is... how we need to listen to our accusers... could we not present the accusations and discuss them one by one... rather than alluding to them and things done so far in the past that to correct them is almost impossible.

Hirelings of Mr Rawlings are also firing back at his accusers, warning them to shelve their attacks on the NDC founder and focused on investigating how they «gifted» power to their main rivals or risk incurring their wrath.

@blip I think you underestimate how often the accuser is believed.

The truth is that no matter how far and fast falsehood has traveled, it must eventually be overtaken by truth and this time, the truth emerged from the mouth of the accuser, albeit, in a Freudian slip.

Our kneejerk reflex — and also the usual response of scientific authorities when confronted with a claim that some bit of research is trivial — is to counter that our accuser just doesn't understand how science works.

In a joke about how the «male apology» is going through a renaissance, Mulaney and Kroll balked at how C.K. mentioned numerous times that his accusers — whom he admitted to masturbating in front of without consent — «admired him» greatly.

Perhaps after his lengthy hiatus in the provinces, he's forgotten how to swim with the sharks... In the predatory world of Roman law, accusers collect a fee from successful prosecutions.

As a new documentary on the US funnyman's rise and fall airs, we speak to two of his accusers to examine how that public persona may yet lead to his ruin

Pt 7, «Cancerous Greenpeace / Desmogblog / Gelbspan Stuff»: What's detailed in this post is how Dave Rado's Ofcom complaint is first and foremost pushing absolutely nothing more than guilt - by - association «evidence» to indict skeptic climate scientists of industry - funded corruption, and secondly, how Rado, much like any other prominent accuser, is enslaved to an accusation narrative which ultimately relies on sources who repeat material which inevitably traces back to Ross Gelbspan and the clique of enviro - activists surrounding him when he and they got the first real media traction for the accusation.

The accuser is a witness for the Crown, meaning she doesn't have a right to representation by a lawyer and has no say in how the proceeding is conducted said Loretta Merritt, a Toronto - based lawyer who specializes in sexual abuse lawsuits.

How can a defence barrister, in the proper performance of their duty to the defendant, and to the court, competently cross-examine an accuser — who the defendant suspects of lying because he wants to protect another person, or has a reason to lie against the defendant — if the defendant has no idea who the witness is?

I've seen what happens to many of these people in court, when they stand up and try to explain to the judge how they are «Mennonites» who can't be found guilty under the Constitution because it's a violation of their rights dating back centuries before America existed, or when they challenge the judge's right to preside over their case because of some arcane law, or that red light cameras are unconstitutional because they do not get to confront their accusers, again, I cringe, because I know what's coming.