Sentences with phrase «how actual humans»

Sorry folks, but that's now how actual humans typically write.

Not exact matches

With tangible strategies and real - world examples, this practical guide teaches you how to stop writing mindless babble for Googlebots — and start writing valuable content for actual humans who want to do business with you.

Let us move now to consider options for understanding how God might exert influence at the other end of the spectrum of actual occasions, namely, by proffering subject aims to those actual occasions that constitute moments in the regnant nexus of the human beings involved.

We need to understand how knowledge can go right or wrong in the actual lives of men, beginning with our estimation of what it means to be human.

Nevertheless, process thinkers in general propose that anything actual at all — subatomic events, amoebic experience, human experience — has some capacity for novelty, at no matter how rudimentary, even negligible a level.

Unlike much of the inherited Western tradition, which has equated creativity with mentality and attributed it only to human beings, process thought considers anything actual at all an instance of creativity, from the tiniest energy event to the most complex creatures we are aware of, human beings; some degree of mentality is present in no matter how rudimentary, even negligible, a form.

How in this case man can be said to be free is one of the paradoxes which Niebuhr holds defies rational understanding.11 But if we accept the paradox, while we may say there is an ideal possibility that we could assert our human will to power in history without sinning and thus bring in the Kingdom of love, this is no actual possibility.

The problem of man is how to love the One on whom he is completely, absolutely dependent; who is the Mystery behind the mystery of human existence in the fatefulness of its selfhood, of being this man among these men, in this time and all time, in the thus and so - ness of the strange actual world.

The previous discussion indicates how Whitehead believes one can, by generalizing from occasions of human experience, talk meaningfully about the nature of nonhuman actual entities in themselves.

In a previous post, we talked a little about how OBs are actual human beings regardless of what some activists in the birth world would have you believe.

Unlike most parenting books, this one is based on actual research into how humans behave.

I jumped in only because the idea that salads / greens need some extra fat in order for human bodies to absorb some of the important phytonutrients is generally well understood in our society now, and I didn't know if Ben knew of the NutritionFacts video and thus how easy it would be to find the actual scientific references.

If you're interested in more of the actual science about why saturated fat can be healthy for you, I have an article below written by a PhD in Nutritional Biochemistry called The Truth about Saturated Fat - it's a must read if you want to understand the science about why saturated fats have been falsely villified and how to enjoy these foods that have always been part of the ancestral human diet.

How in the actual fuck could a lizard hominid deal with the everyday temperate changes us humans handle, unless of course if they were human.

i have to say personal experience i love the game graphic wise it is an astonishing game i liked how the game is compost of 40 % movie cinemas that are gorgeous and 60 % actual game i like this game mode fixes my needs and play style why the cinema is running i get to enjoy my beer and watch and mind blowing graphical short clip i cant ask for more i do have to get real when it come to the game play normal mode is so simple the AI of the robots and human is very poor, when you turn it up to very hard get a bit better make the game play better, when it comes to open word it feels really liked Far Cry Primal a game that i expend liked 200 + hrs for that main reason i may feel some repetition to this game but overall the graphics makes me keep my mind off of it.

Unlike everyone else who has ever been in a «Transformers,» Dempsey has figured out how to interact with the Transformers as a character and an actor, creating a believable actual human whose reactions are both believable and consistent.

The original 2001 film wasn't particularly scary either, but it did succeed in delivering some interesting social commentary on the nature of electronic means of communication, and how it is separating us from actual human contact, leaving those who succumb to it as empty shells who sit in lonely rooms with nothing much to live for.

Parents should be aware that there are a few other scary scenes — hunters shoot Elliott several times (with tranquilizer darts rather than actual bullets, thankfully... but still), Elliott gets sick and is captured, and then later many of the humans are endangered in several different ways — but I can't stress enough how sweet and pure and joyful this movie is overall.

This is how it is in The Girl On The Train: attractive, bored, and oh - so - disaffected residents of New York's cushy Westchester County, acting in ways that don't resemble actual human behavior to create a matrix of deception, infidelity, voyeurism, and murder.

Customers will be able to track their orders through GPS, and will receive a text message when the vehicle approaches that shows them how to unlock and retrieve their pizza from a storage compartment in what would normally be the rear side window of the four - door sedan, all without interacting with an actual human.

How these graduates reply when the alumni office comes calling (including whether or not they reply or write their essays) reveals a great deal, but the actual human beings behind those 3 - 5 paragraphs come to light only during reunion weekend.

Plus, I'd get to see another human face, hold the merchandise in my hands, and have an actual conversation about why they were selling it, when they'd bought it — and how they were enjoying their holiday season!

But there is a consistent theme to all of them: Davies is cited just for the accusation that illicit funding has gone to skeptic climate scientists and organizations skeptical of catastrophic human - induced global warming; when will he finally provide actual evidence proving the funding was done under arrangements where all parties agreed on what, when, where, and how the lies would be spread??

While the report does not speculate on the actual effects these changes will have on the ability of the human population to survive, the scientists permit themselves the observation that it is hard to see how humans can adapt to such rapid changes.

«My view, is that focusing on a linear trend with respect to a actual nonlinear signal is a substantial oversimplication of how we should expect the climate sytstem to behave both naturally, and in response to the diversity of human climate forcings.»

The Consensus Gap is the difference between the public's perception of how much agreement there is among scientists that humans are causing global warming (red distribution), compared to the actual 97 % consensus among scientists publishing in the peer - reviewed literature (green line).

That's when she realized the power of community, when people from all walks of life with varying skillsets and backgrounds come together with the common goal of protecting the Earth for future generations, and how it does so much more than protect the actual land — it makes us feel human again.

Instead, it refers to a duty to accommodate — which duty is well founded in Ontario's human rights law (section 11 of the Ontario Human Rights Code — see how easy it is to cite authority for actual obligatiohuman rights law (section 11 of the Ontario Human Rights Code — see how easy it is to cite authority for actual obligatioHuman Rights Code — see how easy it is to cite authority for actual obligations?).

It reveals tiny changes - from the rippling of a woman's stomach as a baby moves inside, the actual way the blood flows in the human body, how fast your heart is beating, to the wobbly motion of your eyeballs inside of your skull, vibrations of individual guitar strings.

But if you understand how these bots work, you can optimize your resume to get past these technological gatekeepers and into the hands of an actual human.

It's a well - documented reality that networking is how candidates get jobs, so appease the ATS as much as you can, but focus your energy on getting your resume in front of an actual human.

Would you rather navigate a maze of «press 1 for...» and «tell us how we can help you...», or would you rather be connected to an actual human being?