What needs explaining is not who discovered what — the scientists or the «deniers» — but
how alarmist claims about climate change always seem to precede the evidence, such that researchers believe the negative picture before the science has delivered a verdict.
Not exact matches
In the ensuing report we present a meta - analysis of the peer - reviewed scientific literature, examining
how the productivities of Earth's plants have responded to the 20th and now 21st century rise in global temperature and atmospheric CO2, a rise that climate
alarmists claim is unprecedented over thousands of years (temperature) to millions of years (CO2 concentration).
No matter
how often these
claims are shown to be dishonest, they resurrect themselves in a way that suggests
alarmists delight in their use.
In addition, having been to Glacier National Park in the 1990s and having read in the National Park Service Brochure that there weren't any glaciers in this area during the Medieval Warming Period and then reading
Alarmist stories about
how these glaciers «will be lost forever» made me cynical about their
claims.
The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal
how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and
how most scientists do not support the
alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
That some people now try to
claim they are bogus simply shows
how desperate they are to keep the AGW
alarmist lie alive.
In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing
how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and
how most scientists do not support the
alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
I don't see
how alarmists can
claim one as absolute truth without recognising the possibility of the other.
Both climate - change deniers and climate - change
alarmists are wrong on their
claims about the implications of this [Northern Hemisphere] winter and
how they interpret the behaviour of the earth's climatic system over the past 2000 years.
More importantly, this piece shows
how scientists are not «
alarmists» despite the constant
claim that they are.