This contrasting artistic image of an early Martian environment with a thicker atmosphere (left) and the cold, dry Mars of today (right) shows
how atmospheric changes affect a planet's ability to hold life.
Not exact matches
The new study covers the entire U.S. West, from the High Plains states to the Pacific coast, and provides the first detailed look at
how groundwater recharge may
change as the climate
changes, said senior author Thomas Meixner, UA professor and associate department head of hydrology and
atmospheric sciences.
And by carefully measuring and modeling the resulting
changes in
atmospheric composition, scientists could improve their estimate of
how sensitive Earth's climate is to CO2, said lead author Joyce Penner, a professor of
atmospheric science at the University of Michigan whose work focuses on improving global climate models and their ability to model the interplay between clouds and aerosol particles.
«We're really interested in
how animals are sensing and using and adapting to
changes in
atmospheric conditions,» says University of Oklahoma aeroecologist Jeffrey Kelly.
«It's one of the clearest examples of
how humans are actually
changing the intensity of storm processes on Earth through the emission of particulates from combustion,» said Joel Thornton, an
atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle and lead author of the new study in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.
«It gives further evidence of the close links between
atmospheric CO2 and temperature, but also shows
how heterogeneous this climate
change may be on land,» he adds.
By studying the chemistry of growth rings in the shells of the quahog clam, an international team led by experts from Cardiff University and Bangor University have pieced together the history of the North Atlantic Ocean over the past 1000 years and discovered
how its role in driving the
atmospheric climate has drastically
changed.
Gentine and his team are now exploring ways to model
how biosphere - atmosphere interactions may
change with a shifting climate, as well as learning more about the drivers of photosynthesis, in order to better understand
atmospheric variability.
Using published data from the circumpolar arctic, their own new field observations of Siberian permafrost and thermokarsts, radiocarbon dating,
atmospheric modeling, and spatial analyses, the research team studied
how thawing permafrost is affecting climate
change and greenhouse gas emissions.
How will
atmospheric circulation patterns
change?
New measurements by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies indicate that 2012 was the ninth warmest year since 1880, and that the past decade or so has seen some of the warmest years in the last 132 years.One way to illustrate
changes in global
atmospheric temperatures is by looking at
how far temperatures stray from «normal», or a baseline.
By analyzing boron in shells accumulated over more than 2 million years, Hönisch was able to reconstruct in unprecedented detail
how atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have
changed over time.
The researchers warn, however, that the future evolution of the AMO remains uncertain, with many factors potentially affecting
how it interacts with
atmospheric circulation patterns, such as Arctic sea ice loss,
changes in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions and concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
We can then hope to answer questions like what drives Jupiter's
atmospheric changes, and
how the weather we see is connected to processes hidden deep within the planet.»
There is, therefore, much current interest in
how coccolithophore calcification might be affected by climate
change and ocean acidification, both of which occur as
atmospheric carbon dioxide increases.
With one AWARE location near the coast and another in the interior, project scientists aim to compare
how atmospheric systems passing through West Antarctica affect both locations, and
how those
changes translate to wider global shifts.
One major question is
how climate
change may be intensifying westerly winds around Antarctica, and what those
changes will do to southern polar clouds, says Andrew Vogelmann, an
atmospheric scientist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York.
Their results showed that
changes in key water - stress variables are strongly modified by vegetation physiological effects in response to increased CO2 at the leaf level, illustrating
how deeply the physiological effects due to increasing
atmospheric CO2 impact the water cycle.
The researchers say that adding this
atmospheric monitoring technique to the suite of tools used to monitor climate
change can help to better understand greenhouse gas emissions from specific regions and
how they are
changing over time.
They were Jorge Sarmiento, an oceanographer at Princeton University who constructs ocean - circulation models that calculate
how much
atmospheric carbon dioxide eventually goes into the world's oceans; Eileen Claussen, executive director of the Pew Center for Global Climate
Change in Washington, D.C.; and David Keith, a physicist with the University of Calgary in Alberta who designs technological solutions to the global warming problem.
The overall goal is to study
how Mars loses its
atmospheric gas to space, and the role this process has played in
changing the Martian climate over time.
Climate
change scenarios are based on projections of future greenhouse gas (particularly carbon dioxide) emissions and resulting
atmospheric concentrations given various plausible but imagined combinations of
how governments, societies, economies, and technologies will
change in the future.
This information is vital for numerical models, and answers questions about
how dynamic ice sheets are, and
how responsive they are to
changes in
atmospheric and oceanic temperatures.
Results: Tiny bits of
atmospheric dust and particles called aerosols may play a big role in global climate
change, but just
how big a role is not well understood.
«We know rather little about
how much methane comes from different sources and
how these have been
changing in response to industrial and agricultural activities or because of climate events like droughts,» says Hinrich Schaefer, an
atmospheric scientist at the National Institute of Water and
Atmospheric Research (NIWA) in New Zealand, who collaborates with Petrenko.
That allows scientists to learn
how they adapt to climate
change and what greater role those lands can play in reducing
atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions, especially protecting forests.
For my post-doctoral project, I decided to focus on the question, «to what extent can
atmospheric pollutants, such as CO2 and ozone, exert a selective effect on woody plant species, and
how are the resulting
changes in the genetic composition of the plant community likely to affect the animals that feed on them?»
Paul O'Gorman, an
atmospheric scientist at MIT, has looked at
how climate models expect the intensity of extreme snowfalls to
change compared to average snowfalls.
This method tries to maximize using pure observations to find the temperature
change and the forcing (you might need a model to constrain some of the forcings, but there's a lot of uncertainty about
how the surface and
atmospheric albedo
changed during glacial times... a lot of studies only look at dust and not other aerosols, there is a lot of uncertainty about vegetation
change, etc).
Because this climate sensitivity is derived from empirical data on
how Earth responded to past
changes of boundary conditions, including
atmospheric composition, our conclusions about limits on fossil fuel emissions can be regarded as largely independent of climate models.
This symposium brings together experts across disciplines to better understand
how planets like Earth, Venus and Mars have
changed over time — from their
atmospheric composition, geology, chemical composition and interactions with the Sun — to help understand what it takes to support life and whether it could exist beyond our solar system.
Sarah adds, «I think if you think of Dracula, there's something so
atmospheric about it, and there's something so magical and eerie about Ireland, like the weather and
how it
changes, and there's so much history in those forests and they add to the visual image of the film.»
In addition to inviting contemporary artists to be involved in the project, historical representations of
atmospheric conditions will be exhibited that illustrate
how the idea of «air» has
changed quite dramatically over the last few centuries.
As NOAA's Mauna Loa measurement of
atmospheric methane concentrations are only currently increasing at a rate of approximately 0.25 % per year (or 12.5 %
change in 50 - years);
how could anyone be concerned that the
change in
atmospheric methane burden in 50 - years could be 300 % (as per Isaken et al (2011) case 4XCH4; which would require an additional 0.80 GtCH4 / yr of methane emissions on top of the current rate of methane emissions of 0.54 GtCH4 / yr)?
Would somebody here, like to explain to me
how we can lose Arctic Sea ice (in part or in whole) without
changing the
atmospheric circulation patterns?
If we knew ocean heat uptake as well as we know
atmospheric temperature
change, then we could pin down fairly well the radiative imbalance at the top of the atmosphere, which would give us a fair indication of
how much warming is «in the pipeline» given current greenhouse gas concentrations.
How do Vostok, Dome C and other Antarctic and Greenland ice core records of historic levels of
atmospheric CO2 compare with
changes in THC and the AMO?
These
changes alter the biospheric carbon cycle, and can significantly affect
how much carbon is cycled through plant matter, in turn causing
changes in
atmospheric CO2.
However, if the loss of Arctic Sea ice has significantly
changed global
atmospheric circulation patterns, then we are dealing with a different system that has only been in existence since 2007, and we do not know
how often to expect crop failures.
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the climate record and methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST
changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing
how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate
changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in
atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).
How do the complex feedbacks
change atmospheric circulation patterns, and the interaction of these patterns to
changes in ice cap topography (e.g. at the LGM)?
Global Climate
Change and Human Activity From RealClimate, a «simpler» explanation on
how we know «that not only part of the
atmospheric CO2 increase is due to human activities, but all of it.»
I doubt that anyone has an accurate gut feeling of what the mass ratio of anthropogenic
atmospheric CO2 is to my car, or
how ponderous the
changes that CO2 will make will be.
Abstract: «Understanding
how global temperature
changes with increasing
atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, or climate sensitivity, is of central importance to climate
change research.
His book, «The Two - Mile Time Machine,» is a fascinating account of
how scientists have learned to use ice as a history book of climatic and
atmospheric changes — and what Greenland has revealed about times when climate jogged abruptly.
What's important here, and remains important, scientists say, is
how the patterns of
atmospheric and climatic
change reveal the most about the involvement of greenhouse gases, not simply the
change in global temperature.
Climate alarm depends on several gloomy assumptions — about
how fast emissions will increase,
how fast
atmospheric concentrations will rise,
how much global temperatures will rise,
how warming will affect ice sheet dynamics and sea - level rise,
how warming will affect weather patterns,
how the latter will affect agriculture and other economic activities, and
how all climate
change impacts will affect public health and welfare.
How can one estimate the effect of a
change in
atmospheric CO ₂ without reference to climate sensitivity?
22 Weather Maps Weather maps can be used to show
how changes in
atmospheric conditions can influence local weather.
If you accept that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and that human fossil fuel use is now the dominant contributor to
atmospheric CO2
changes, then knowing
how much global temperatures respond to increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is important for understanding the future climate.