The sixth video short in NACSA's Authorizer Voices series shares
how authorizers protect both access to charter schools and school autonomy, with a look at Washington, D.C.'s Public Charter School Board and discipline.
Check out this video of Lauren Morando Rhim and others discussing
how authorizers ensure access to charter schools for students with unique needs.
Since the passage of NCLB, there has been much speculation in the charter school community generally, and among authorizers specifically, on how the provisions of this federal law will affect
how authorizers...
For that reason, I was very glad to see NACSA surveying and publishing information about
how authorizers oversee special education.
This article focuses on
how authorizers handle the oversight processes of charter schools in California.
Not exact matches
The NACSA report on state policies associated with charter school accountability attempts to describe
how laws, regulations, and
authorizer practices interact to influence charter quality.
Alpha
authorizers can show the way by having the courage to tackle the politics associated with closing underperforming schools and knowing
how to document the facts in order to prevail in the court of law and public opinion.
That question —
how to make sure that charter school
authorizers hold up their end of the accountability bargain — is arising a lot lately as examples of failed charter schools proliferate.
National Association of Charter School
Authorizers president Greg Richmond pointed out that there are real, substantive disagreements over
how to understand the civic mission of schooling.
NACSA, on the other hand, «has helped our nation's charter school
authorizers improve
how they do their jobs for over 15 years.»
In part, that's because
authorizers, bankers, and donors are paying increasing attention to
how well the schools are governed.
Charter
authorizers, depending on
how they are structured, can provide a level of democratic input.
How about Chicago's district — the only charter
authorizer for the nation's third - largest city — which recently declared that buildings no longer needed by the district are off - limits to charters for 40 years.)
So, he asks «whether regulators are any good at identifying which schools will contribute to test score gains» and then says this: «The bottom line is that none of the factors used by
authorizers to open or renew charter schools in New Orleans were predictive of
how much test score growth these schools could produce later on.»
Here's a map from the new NACSA @qualitycharters report on state charter
authorizers showing
how many
authorizers each state has.
The Standards identify core
authorizer responsibilities and describe
how the principles are upheld within each responsibility.
The case study is an important contribution to a relatively new field, examining
how one successful charter
authorizer is advancing student achievement and increasing the number of high - quality charter seats available.
«This is the question of the future in the charter school world —
how each city will manage growth,» said Greg Richmond, president of National Association of Charter School
Authorizers.
2)
How many charter authorizers actually do a good job of judging school quality — how representative is the highly idealized, romantic fantasy Mike has provided here of the way charter authorizers typically work back here on Earth Pri
How many charter
authorizers actually do a good job of judging school quality —
how representative is the highly idealized, romantic fantasy Mike has provided here of the way charter authorizers typically work back here on Earth Pri
how representative is the highly idealized, romantic fantasy Mike has provided here of the way charter
authorizers typically work back here on Earth Prime?
Some believe the problem is one where the goal of these schools is simply lost in the listening — or lack of it — and that the mom - and - pops could benefit from the assistance of professionals who know
how to communicate a good idea to
authorizers and philanthropists.
RH:
How do you think about the relationship with Greg Richmond and the National Association of Charter School
Authorizers?
I've seen
how painful this process can be, both as a charter
authorizer who closed schools and a board member of a school that had to close.
Our report Going Exponential offers advice for
authorizers, school operators, and policymakers about growing successful charter schools, based on research about
how organizations have grown quickly and with quality in other sectors.
NR: We currently don't have a formal relationship, and part of what I'm going to do over the next ninety days is to see if we can come up with informal ways of working more closely with groups like NACSA, especially since the discussion around quality is so focused on what
authorizers are doing and
how quickly they're shutting down poorly performing schools... Of course, it's very difficult to shut down a school that has a following, but I don't think our sector has done a very good job of explaining to families what a good, high quality school looks like and why it's so important to not tolerate poor performance.
Authorizers play a powerful role in supporting proposed new charter schools by requiring applicants to articulate
how they will support all students — students with IEPs in particular.
As an
authorizer, the district would have power of approval and input over a charter school application and could determine
how it would fit into the district's education goals.
A non - profit charter school
authorizer in Minnesota called Innovative Quality Schools (see https://iqsmn.org) provides a good example of
how this kind of school district could operate.
It will have five more sections of rules to discuss eventually, including details about
how the board will oversee the
authorizers.
These issues will ultimately impact a diverse array of
authorizer responsibilities including the appropriate selection and use of annual assessments, school compliance with parental notification provisions, and
how charter schools demonstrate they are using Title I funds appropriately.
Education Week: New Evidence on
How Charter
Authorizers Can Build Better Schools http://bit.ly/2cCxAfh
Lenders should know
how state laws and
authorizer practices hold charter schools accountable; look at every pertinent public record including intervention and probation notices; and ask their own tough questions about trends in academic performance and evidence of fiscal stewardship.
Last spring, Jessica Calefati of the Bay Area's Mercury News did an excellent, in - depth series on K12 — explaining
how the connected nonprofits produce dismal results for students but big profits for K12 and the
authorizers.
This brief for the National Association of Charter School
Authorizers explores
how and why
authorizer hopping happens and offers recommendations to stop it.
Supporting Dr. Noguera's view of authorizing, even when he made decisions that didn't sit well with charter school opponents, would keep an ally who knows
how to toe the line in the
authorizer's chair.
While the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools (LAPCS) is disappointed that the school was not successful, this is a significant opportunity for charters schools and their
authorizers alike to recognize
how important it is to implement clear and agreed upon performance standards.
This guidance provides valuable information and suggestions to assist schools, state and local education agencies,
authorizers of charter schools, parents, and other stakeholders in understanding
how federal laws function to provide protections for students with disabilities in order to ensure they receive a quality education free from discrimination.
«
Authorizer Spotlight:
How Philadelphia Put Annual Reports into Practice» provides an in - depth look at the process the Charter School Office of the School District of Philadelphia went through to implement annual reporting...
Education Research Alliance for New Orleans: New Report Released: «The Ultimate Choice:
How Charter
Authorizers Approve and Renew Schools in Post-Katrina New Orleans» http://bit.ly/2cEvz0z
From the initial charter school application,
authorizers must be cognizant of
how CMO and EMO - operated schools differ from traditional charter schools and
how they differ from each other.
This class is best suited for those that are at the very beginning of the charter school journey and want to better understand the charter landscape, process and timeline,
authorizer expectations, and
how to build a strong team.
DeArmond, Jochim, and Lake (2014) looked at
how the issue of governance affects both charters and traditional public schools in high - choice cities and found nearly eight agencies — including school districts, charter
authorizers, and other state and local entities — responsible for oversight in the typical municipality, «making patchwork governance the norm, rather than the exception» (p. 15).
Nearly a third of charter
authorizers have not established clear revocation criteria; fewer than half have the kinds of strong, independent review panels the association recommends; and about only half issue annual reports that show the schools
how they are doing.
One suggestion is that charter school
authorizers require that in addition to academic qualifications, charter - school applicants show
how «the school will broaden, not replicate, existing opportunities for struggling populations.»