Conservative bloggers have attacked Bushman's previous research on
how biblical passages can make people behave more aggressively after reading stories of «God - sanctioned violence.»
Not exact matches
And today many are convinced on the basis of various
passages in the
biblical book of Genesis that all nations will be judged in accordance with
how they treat Israel.
Since the mere recitation of
Biblical passages does not suffice, these professionals require guidance as to
how to move from text to sermon.
He left us some great
biblical passages to tell us
how to enjoy it according to His plan (Proverbs, Song of Solomon, I Corinthians 7 anyone?).
Enns goes on to examine various
passages from Second Temple literature to show
how «
biblical interpreters exhibit for us an attitude toward
biblical interpretation that operates on very different standards from those of modern interpreters.
The reason I am summarizing it is because I want to begin looking at some of the key
biblical passages which are affected by my proposal to see
how we can read and understand these texts.
So Justin went on a quest: to reexamine the
biblical passages that relate to homosexuality to see what they might teach him about
how God wanted him to live.
To answer that question, Justin argues that we have to have «a clear, consistent
biblical standard for interpreting the text, a principle we can apply to various
passages that will help us to determine, fairly and consistently,
how to translate them for our culture... Such a standard would need to be able to differentiate God's eternal laws — such as those dealing with murder, theft, and adultery — from the cultural
biblical rules Christians are no longer obligated to follow — such as those dealing with dietary restrictions and head coverings.»
Furthermore, since Peter was one of the apostles, his explanation of the flood event in 2 Peter 2 provides an authoritative,
biblical explanation for
how to understand this difficult
passage.
This
passage is perhaps one of the most powerful
biblical illustrations of
how often it is those who walk closest to Jesus prevent children from approaching Him.
This is the attempt to get behind the
biblical records to their sources in oral tradition and written fragments, and thus to determine
how individual
passages, called pericopes, are related to each other.
What troubles me is this: When discussing
how to apply the Bible both personally and in public policy, nine times out of ten, the words of Jesus are trumped by some other
biblical passage or are discounted as impractical.
Observations the industrialist made about
how he practiced respect for persons sounded like the Corinthian
passage; and the discussion participants listening to these remarks thought they were listening to a paraphrase of the
biblical text.
As I was looking through some of the
biblical passages analyzed in the book, I was surprised by
how verses generally deemed culturally specific often appeared in close proximity to verses generally deemed trans - cultural.
Robespierre's address to the Commune of Paris at the convention of 1793 evidences that his Supreme Being also had this same character: «L'homme pervers se croit sans cesse environné d'un témoin puissant et terrible anquel il ne peut échapper, qui le voit et le veille, tandis que les hommes sont livrés au sommeil...» (F. A. Aulard, Le Culte de la raison et le culte de l'Être Supreme (Paris, 1892), pp. 285 f.)
How can one isolate this «structure» and separate it from its
biblical antecedents, when — to cite only one of the many
passages — one can read in the book of Isaiah (29:15): «Woe to those who hide deep from the Lord their counsel, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, «Who sees us?
In addition to dealing with the
biblical text, there may also be a need to show
how this one
passage is related to the central issues of Scripture.
But,
Biblical interpretation aside, I feel it is foolish to place so much emphasis on 5 verses, when there is an entire Bible FULL of chapters and
passages all about
how we are to relate to each other.
This is the final revision sheet in a series of five, aimed at the OCR GCSE Philosophy (Unit B602) Paper 2, with some key points and suggested
Biblical passages, looking at what Christians rely on to determine
how they should behave.
This can mean anything from discussing
Biblical passages about transformation and redemption to discussing Christian values, such as defining what is right or wrong about a particular situation and
how the Christian concept of sin plays a role in relationships and human behavior.