The way people are completely disregarding
how dangerous a player he is capable of and was actually being quite consistently dumbfounds me.
Not exact matches
He was our best
players 2 seasons ago, and we knw ao much we missed hm last season nd d impact he made in the few games he played, I has shown
how dangerous he can be too dis season, mybe he's not dat sharp yet, but bcos he doesn't get into d 1st 11 dis season doesn't mean he won't next season wen he will be available for preseason especially wen alexis won't be....
What's this i see here.This site is also in a crisis and that is understating the qualities of our players.I for one will take Walcott over Pedro and i am just responding to a question.I just do nt get it.To me Walcott really is that good and we need him inform.Injuries have hampered his progress a lot as a
player but at least i am happy with him.I do not even get why peeps criticize him so badly.To me he should be our starting right winger.We need him because he is a game changer.I just do nt get
how he is on the bench.Peeps are so ignorant and will gather whatever facts they can to make him seem average.Talk about the certain 3 musketeers in arsenal lineup but not him.He is a very
dangerous player
All I could think of was
how many
players get injured running into things out of bounds and
how dirty and
dangerous it was.
Ozil when not making great passes will always disappoint, he does not offer a goal threat, which will only allows the defenders to sit off and wait for him to try and pass to the forward runners (for such a talented
player how much fouls does he get us in
dangerous areas)
Lets hope Joel can get some confidence quick because we seen
how he is a
dangerous player when confident in the WC.
The Arsenal played well we had over 70 % position of the ball with something like 27 attacks were 8 were on target burnly had a game plan and that game plan was about hurting our
players ankles and they got away scot free with it yet xaka gets red?????? Yes they were diddling about when that happened but compare it to the challenge on ozil and he was on goal yes koscienly came back from an offside position but the high boot on the head was
dangerous I thought Arsenal played well and controlled the game well even when we were put under pressure in our own half when you look at the penalty awarded to them you will see a dive as coquelin barely touched him
how many time did they push kosscielny of the ball???? hope he is ok as he was looking like he had a thigh problem I like the back four of todays as Gabriel did ok specially when we went down to ten men >> > I salute our Arsenal for wining the game on the 97 minit with only 10 men on the field What an iced cold penalty scored by Alexis
You can tell
how dangerous of a play this was because of
how the Flames
players reacted.
, His outputs are very low compared to the media attention he gets for staying or leaving..................... We've had better
players, when they left we survived not to talk of a mentally reserved footballer (ozil) and a
player that gets bullied when he tries to get to
dangerous positions.............................. you should know what I mean if you really know
how football is played.
What he was very poor.Bolasie was using him for some skills i do nt know if i watched him clearly or i was blind but Bolasie had a good game against Monreal and Zaha too even all
dangerous crosses were from his side.I do nt know what i watched.He was caught out a lot of times and the
player you are talking about is koscielny he was at left back several times defending for him.I do nt know
how to convince you because i watched him a lot of time and he was beaten easily against Bolasie.
Sanchez would be a similar style of
player and has shown just
how dangerous he can be in the Premier League since moving to Arsenal in 2014.
the problem lies in fact that most fans see only name and fame of
player Jamie vardy would have been a good backup
player to have considering our luck with injuries and it is not always about the transfer fee or name remember falcao robinho mutu schevshenko etc etc about engine vardy had an amazing engine and modern game always require hard workers in team
how many times u have seen ox tracking back he carelessly loses ball at
dangerous positions very often
I wouldn't say we have turned a corner but we're certainly going in the right direction both mentally and tactically... Really Le Prof is going vintage lately putting the right tactics and
players on the field making the right subs too (after the subs he made WHU were tired and Giroud who was at heart of every
dangerous attack killed the game off)... Ramsey performance was great, Özil (missed some great opportunities in final 3rd) and Coquelin missed a couple of passes but solid play from both... I think people don't understand
how Özil passes is important for the fluidity of our game....
These are
dangerous territories and I admire
how wenger and his
players stood up to it without crossing the line.
How did we get in a position where one of our most
dangerous players (Antonio) is rarely played in his most effective position (wide right) and now plays as a lone striker after it was discovered that he wasn't a right back?
It's very
dangerous to project
how a
player will perform for the rest of his career.
However it seems Jose Mourinho has become more street smart on his return to the bridge.His traits of forcing Manchester United to pay 37million pounds for Mata, dumping out Lukaku to a non -
dangerous club like Everton and now with this immediate departure, one thing has become inevitable that the Chelsea boss knows
how to get good money for valuable
players.
This past weekend, the MInnesota State High School League took an unprecedented step of changing the rules mid-season, by stiffening the penalties on three of the most violent and
dangerous infractions in hockey: checking from behind, boarding and contact to the head will now result in an automatic five - minute «major» against the offending
player resulting in ejection and forcing his team to play short - handed for five minutes, regardless of
how many times it is scored upon during the ensuing power play.
In freeing up the world, the game evokes semi-open world spaces like Wolfenstein 2009's Isenstadt and gives
players a true sense of
how dangerous Union is.
In a similar fashion to
how Elite:
Dangerous started out with single crew ships and eventually added multi-crew options, Starfighter Inc. has plans to add this as well to add to the cooperation between
players.
Although
players start with the majority of their path in sight, when passing through tight gaps and around corners full of spikes, it can be hard to judge just
how close you are to the edge, making that slight movement even more
dangerous than maybe it ought to be.
Players will also have to contend with the weather and the time of day when approaching different objectives, as all of these affect
how dangerous the enemy is.
How do you make a profound theme such as the delicate balance between good and evil, yin and yang, and
dangerous beauty transcend the medium of video games into a
player's mind and soul?
In this two - fisted arcade shooter, Thunder Wolves, the
player becomes part of this formidable group of pilots who carry out every order, no matter
how dangerous, with unequalled precision and speed.
-- This is
how to balance a single -
player game — «give the
player interesting decisions» means «give the
player an impressive choice of tools» 1 The punishing early game teaches several lessons: Protracted shootouts are
dangerous.
There have also been a number of stories in the media of
how Pokémon Go
players are finding themselves in
dangerous situations as a result of the exploration that is encouraged in game.
It's sort of a change in
how the timing works, but it pulls the
player in the part of the screen or the part of the world that's
dangerous, where the enemies are, to keep them from just staying back.
The skill cap is very high, and you're typically measured by
how well you perform against other
players — the most
dangerous game.
As
players progress through MGS, they are bombarded with examples of
how certain highly sophisticated scientific and technological advancements, which often elude the awareness and understanding of the general public, remain in the hands of powerful organizations and governments where they become
dangerous in their use.
Locked up in a dark cellar, the
player only has a short time to figure out what has happened and
how to escape from the clutches of a
dangerous serial killer.
I jumped at the opportunity to work out
how to bring that kind of experience to the Elite
Dangerous universe and even though still in its (hopefully) relative infancy, it's been rewarding to see the great reaction of
players to CQC so far internally.
Comments from the floor ranged from defensive (the APA staff essentially said, «If we want to be a
player here with psychiatry we need to get these guidelines out now»; representatives from division 39, psychoanalysis, claimed unfair treatment of psychoanalysis and psychodynamic TX,) to accurate (the president of the Women's division strongly suggested that decontextualizing PTSD was
dangerous to those who suffered from it,) to the idiotic (sorry about casting aspersions here — but I am always fascinated when psychologists in love with RCTs and meta - analyses as the only viable evidence base stand at the mic and spout effect sizes etc. — overlooking the important contributions from qualitative research, and misunderstanding
how RCTs are based on drug trials that simply do not translate to humans.