Sentences with phrase «how doing certain things»

How do certain things differ from other companies?

As with most advances in our ever - changing world, we look back on how we did certain things as outdated.

Not exact matches

I can see how much time I've spent in a certain place, or doing a certain thing.

If certain things from the list don't come up during the conversation, it might be useful to think about how you can up your personal standards in those areas.

In the beginning, we had no idea how to do certain things, and we were trying a bunch of stuff, some of which didn't work.

For Simpson, one thing is for certain: It doesn't matter how big his company grows to be, or what the latest design trend is, the customer will always be in the center of it all.

You can do certain things, like claim more or fewer allowances on your W - 4, to help affect how much you have to pay in taxes per paycheck.

It may be somewhat useful to make comparisons to that period of time to see how certain interest rate sensitive asset classes such as junk bonds, REITs, dividend - paying stocks or bonds performed, but my guess is that particular environment doesn't do a great job of showing investors what a typical rising rate scenario would look like (assuming there is such a thing).

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

Jon unfortunately if you don't believe in certain things you could be hung, stoned to death, burned alive, chopped up with an axe, drowned, crucified, shot, stabbed or how about this; be in a building when a plane flies into it.

You tell me all the good things you've done, and I give you a certain number of points for each item, depending on how good it was.

Some things are a battle but the Lord does tell he «he doesn't give us more than we can bare» — Sometimes it takes deliverance or a walk of learning how to live without certain sins.

We who sacrifice fabulous resources to fatten the most inhuman form of violence so that it will continue to protect us, and who pass our time in transmitting futile messages from a planet that is risking destruction to planets that are already dead» how can we have the extraordinary hypo crisy to pretend that we do not understand all those people who did such things long before us: those, for example, who made it their practice to throw a single child, or two at the most, into the furnace of a certain Moloch in order to ensure the safety of the others?

If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?

I don't see how our ability to discern things as or interpret things as mutually exclusive for certain conditions const itutes something immaterial.

But one thing for certain, no one has seen Jesus so how do you know what he looks like?

I will never knock someones faith as long as it is not forced on others, I understand how someone is led to do certain things, and think it is a calling.

I get offended, too, at certain things, but I can at least realize why and how I came to be offended, whereas a religious person is mentally incapable of facing any such thing and will get quite extremely offended without any legitimate reason to do so.

Well, for one thing Romney isn't in any church leadership role currently, so basically he is just like anyone else who is of a certain faith who also happens to be running for office, so how does someone in that situation run for office when it comes to the idea of separation of church and state?

(they did NOT need peer review to know how to start a fire, to know how to cook to know, that certain things happened..

I think as consumers we should be wary of avoiding a certain product simply due to skepticism — it's one thing to recommend not using a product because it has scientifically been proven to cause harm; it's another to recommend not using a product because of subjective reasons, such as how creepy the fact is that X. campestris is the culprit of black rot on crucifers (or personal opinions of the FDA)... yes, X. campestris is used to ferment sugars to produce xanthan gum, but the fact that it causes rotting of crucifers is unrelated (and doesn't suddenly make xanthan gum harmful).

How you like certain foods prepared one way, even though it's the same thing Eg my boyfriend doesn't really like hommus but likes chickpeas whilst I'm the reversal..

The fact that Alvarez hired him back after he went just 19 - 19 in Pittsburgh shows how strongly Alvarez felt that Wisconsin needed to return to a certain way of doing things.

We need our fans to play on Mesuts Gooner tweeting side, he usually says the right things on twitter so we need to try and get him to back himself into a corner, if he mention's how he'd never do a certain move, not here nor Spain, well then I think he'd stand by that.

, and he knows how to not let things get stale, I take everything back that I said about him last season even though I believe he needs a certain spend to do what he does as well as he does it.

Funny how a certain user here has been doing that for YEARS, writing the same things all the time, yet all gunz blazing will get the ban.

but I do think issues will come up both with these ppv numbers (however big the issue is yet to be seen) and there will be some issues with sponsors especially now in this WME era as they are trying to make it even more mainstream acceptable, look at how sensitive certain things are with FOX so I think it's fair for them to suggest it will cost them money.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Only the Olympics has what you could call a comprehensive testing system, but even then there are NO tests for certain things like Insulin and WADA has said that there is no test at all for Mechanic Growth Factor and they don't even know How to make one.

For example, BRT spoke about how we need to teach men not to feel entitled to certain things (like women's bodies) they don't have a right to, as well as not conditioning «famous» people to believe they can get away with things by idolizing them so much.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

Ok people, lets try to reply with less emotion... Just because you like a certain team, doesn't necessarily mean that everything your team does or every kit they have is the greatest thing since sliced bread... I love Chelsea like a shark loves blood, not to mention, i love Adidas products equally as passionate... But even i can admit that i hated their kit last season... You should answer truthfully about how you feel about a kit and move on... Stop trying to stick it to the next person that gives an opinion...

While I am not at all certain how many successful failures lay in our near future, I do know one thing: bed time is non-negotiable.

She gave me lots of practical advice and suggestions, kept my mind focused on each task at hand, showed me how to do certain things that I was nervous about, and gradually I became more comfortable with taking care of two babies.

I am planning a home birth so if I do end up in hospital its because I absolutely have to be there or its an emergency situation where a C - section is called for I going to be meeting those people pretty much for the first time [laughs] and I don't know what they are, how receptive they would to something like this, so you know there are certain things you think might be easier to ask for verses asking of all of this things, perhaps you know, maybe it doesn't have to be all or nothing but I don't know are there certain things that you think might be good for me to ask for in lieu of asking for everything.

there are certain innovations where you think, «how did anyone used to live without this thing?»

Regardless of how you feel, there's one thing for certain: It's going to put a damper on your budget, even if you're doing okay today.

One thing is certain, this won't last long, curious baby's don't give up and they learn fairly quickly how to escape mom and dad's clever life hacks!

SO MUCH of this stuff really depends on your specific house (and your kid) and how much shifting and moving of really dangerous items you can do, but we really shunned most of the pricey plastic «solution» doohickeys and went with simply moving things higher up, or putting certain things AWAY for good (easily - toppled glass - topped endtables, for example).

The book doesn't so much delve into that and I had more questions about how, but one thing it discusses is the helicopter - parented child who never has to figure anything out for himself, gets to college and after college and doesn't really know how to make things happen because he's never been given the opportunity / challenge or had certain character traits instilled.

Camie talked about how trauma, historical or individual, will always be passed down through each generation until someone is able to step back and question why their family does things a certain way and is willing to look deeply into that family's trauma to heal.

I don't know this in any certain way, but I suspect that there's a different inflection for me having a side project like this than for someone in a group where things like how much time are you spending on your research is policed a lot more.»

«Quantum mechanics makes certain predictions» about how things move and behave «that we don't normally see in the regular world,» he says.

But there are also certain things that if an investigator like [s] to do, and I came from cellular neurobiology having learnt from Grundfest and from Wade Marshall and from my period at the NIH how to study nerve cells in the brain; and I was until that point studying complex organisms — a cat; Aplysia fitted me to a tee.

As most sports statistics tend to focus on how things are now, at a certain point of time, «Game Intelligence in Team Sports» focuses on how things could be done in the future.

Meanwhile, evolutionary biologists have been doing something similar with living things, exploring how and why certain genes have changed over generations.

But given what we know about how big earthquakes are, while it's still possible to have a huge 9.0 magnitude earthquake, it's more likely that it'll be a smaller earthquake, still big, significant over 6.7 magnitude, almost certain to happen by 2038; but one thing [it won't do] is to reshape California's coast; it's not likely to [reshape] California, because it won't be as bad, I think, as people have anticipated.

The questionnaire asked participants to rate their agreement with statements in order to calculate their Facebook activity (such as «I'm posting photographs»), social comparison orientation («I often compare how I am doing socially»), materialism («My life would be better if I owned certain things I don't have»), objectification of Facebook friends («Having many Facebook friends contributes more success in my personal and professional life») and instrumentalization of Facebook friends («To what extent do you think Facebook friends are useful in order to attain your goals?»).

But the thing with brain - injured guys — the thing that really keeps them out — is they can't remember how to do certain motor tasks like drive a car or operate machinery.