Sentences with phrase «how early earth»

Wet Earth Erin Wayman's article «Faint young sun» (SN: 5/4/13, p. 30), about how the early Earth stayed warm enough for liquid water, made me wonder about the effect of the temperature of the planet itself.

Not exact matches

I think early Christians invented that as a scary - sounding disclaimer because they were always talking about how utopian heaven is and how much life on earth sucks, so they didn't want anyone getting any ideas.

I could sit here and point out how stupid you are for believing in science, a group of people that once believed the Earth was flat as early as a few hundred years ago, or believed that bleeding someone out was the best way to cure the flu... or as early as the 40's and 50's that it was okay for people to drink water with high levels of radiation because it would give you energy and cure what ails ya.

(Job 26:7) Now how could Job know that the earth is» suspended upon nothing» over 3,500 years ago, since the earliest telescope was only made in the 17th century C.E. by Galileo?

Certainly, Jesus changed some of the Kingdom expectations through His life, teaching, and ministry, especially in the areas of what sort of Messiah King He was going to be, and how the Kingdom of God would exist and function upon the earth, but the overall hopes and dreams of Israel, especially as presented within the Prophets, remained intact through the teachings and ministry of John, Jesus, and the Early Church.

• Problems with the Origin of Biological Membranes in an Early Earth Environment • Man, Created in the Image of God - How Man is Unique Among All Other Creatures on Earth

In addition to relating details of some of the personal, sometimes quite extreme, interpersonal conflicts between some of the early figures in paleontology, the book also provides a good overview of how scientific estimates regarding the age of the earth and the development of life on earth have advanced over the last few centuries.

Great Reception???, tell you the truth Im not one of those gunners who started supporting the gunners during the invicibles or early Wenger double winning years, quite honestly i wasnt ineterested in football and I liked a certain Crespo and Shevchenko meaning I liked the blue half of London, surprisingly when Mourinho joined I stopped watching football all together, till one glorious Champions League Night, It was my first ever Match there was a certain 20 year old highly rated youngster who scored a wonder goal that day he played with such skill and passion ever since then I started supporting arsenal that was during the barren years.I actually liked Barcelona because of their similarity with the arsenal, so when Fabregas joined Barca I started to watch them a bit more I still loved Arsenal and I was extremely passionate, the other players i adored left in painful manners, while some left which was still painful: i.e Eboue.I always taught cesc would come back and when it was official he was leaving Barca i said Finally almost hosting a party.Well reports started coming out that he is going to join chelsea and i laughed so hard and said he would be the last player on earth to do that, when it became official words cant express how i felt, He was the reason I started watching football he lit up the emirates with exquisite touches through balls to walcott, its a shame I would have preferred he joined bayern, or remained in barca its terrible reading the comments he made recently about the emirates, This was a captain, someone who led, anyways, like ive learnt and Arsenal have learnt, We do nt live in the past Like Liverpool (no pun) WE ARE THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE (Crowley)(Puma) WE ARE ARSENAL.....

I am less reasonable in the Sanchez case, how on earth the club were supposed to get him to extend his contract earlier is absolutely beyond me — short of kidnapping him and threatening to kill his dogs if he didn't extend that is.

They'll get right in amongst it and attempt to disrupt City's passing rhythm early on, but you worry how long they can sustain that sort of pressure, not to mention how on earth they'll respond when they do eventually concede, and they will.

Set at the dawn of time, when dinosaurs and woolly mammoths roamed the earth, EARLY MAN tells the story of how one... [Read More]

Set at the dawn of time, when dinosaurs and woolly mammoths roamed the earth, EARLY MAN tells the story of how one brave caveman, Dug, unites his tribe against a...

It wasn't until I became a parent that I truly understood the deep connection between early childhood experiences and how they affect our relationship to the earth and all living things.

I was just talking about this earlier this afternoon, wondering how on earth the googlebombing had gone.

I investigated how on earth that could possibly have happened earlier — here's my story.

«It is exciting that now Space agencies realize how studies of early Earth and early life evolution are relevant for the search for life beyond Earth.

They show how the other 10 may have been added one by one as early life on Earth became more sophisticated.

As interplanetary dust is thought to have rained down on early Earth, it is likely that the stuff brought water to our planet, although it is difficult to conceive how it could account for the millions of cubic kilometres of water that cover Earth today.

More uniquely, the study demonstrates how the Earth's earliest continental crust — richer in iron and magnesium — was destroyed some two or three billion years ago and how the present continental crust — richer in silicon — formed from it.

An unusual fossil find is giving scientists new ideas about how some of the earliest animals on Earth came to dominate the world's oceans.

Carolyn Porco, leader of the Cassini imaging team, says the ring pictures may even help us figure out how Earth formed: «If we understand how icy particles in the outer solar system behave, then we can refine our understanding of how the early solar system formed from that same material.»

The moon is a bonanza for scientists, Kring says, because it offers crucial insights for understanding the origins and evolution of Earth and other planets: how they formed from the accretion and differentiation of smaller bodies; how they were bombarded by impacts early in their histories; and even how some of them migrated in their orbits around the sun.

How on earth had humans managed to arrive down under so early?

Emma Dunne, from the University of Birmingham's School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, said: «This is the most comprehensive survey ever undertaken on early tetrapod evolution, and uses many newly developed techniques for estimating diversity patterns of species from fossil records, allowing us greater insights into how early tetrapods responded to the changes in their environment.»

To test their hypothesis, they built an early Earth model environment, an organic - rich aqueous solution in which schreibersite might react and corrode in a way similar to how events may have unfolded in prebiotic chemistry.

What needed to be determined, however, was just how schreibersite reacted chemically with the early Earth's watery environment and what resulted from the chemical reaction.

The experiment will run until early 2017 and help climate modelers determine how warming at Earth's poles could change global weather patterns.

Now, researchers working with that hypothesis have achieved a significant advancement toward understanding an evolutionary mystery — how components of RNA and DNA formed from chemicals present on early Earth before life existed.

How the plants sense the full moon remains a mystery, but Rydin's early guess is that they are actually aware of the minute differences in tidal force that the moon exerts on Earth.

These models accurately predict how much water was locked up in the form of ice early in the history of our solar system, billions of years ago, before making its way to Earth.

With the origin of life on Earth believed to have coincided with a period of increased impact flux, the idea that meteorite - formed glass might provide a prevalent, viable habitat for microbes could have a significant «impact» on our understanding of how early life developed.

But where the first RNA came from is a mystery; it's hard to see how the chemicals on early Earth could have combined to form the complicated nucleotides that make up RNA.

No matter how the rich rearrange its letters, though, the down - to - earth and durable alphabet remains — as it was from its earliest days — the doorway to literacy for the common people.

To demonstrate how early life may have formed on Earth, Hanczyc makes chemical droplets, called «protocells,» that behave like living cells.

Early Earth probably would have frozen solid, if not for greenhouse gasses, and a new model shows how they could have feasibly arisen.

Ever since Stanley Miller inaugurated the era of serious research in the origin of life, chemists have been at the forefront of answering the question at the crux of the matter: how did the simple, primordial molecules on an early Earth self - assemble to form self - replicating, robust chemical structures subject to Darwinian natural selection?

How does this value compare with what what we think S was in earlier periods in Earth's history (e.g. do we think it was closer to 1 when there was little ice and / or carbon locked up in vegetation)?

Once they do, scientists will begin analyzing them to learn more about the early solar system — particularly those water molecules and organic compounds, which may help explain the biggest mystery of all, how life on Earth began.

His research was just published in Nature Geoscience, and the theory it proposes solves two long - standing riddles about the early earth: How come the earth was warm enough to have water when the sun was only three - quarters as bright 4 billion years ago, and where on earth did the nitrogen needed for life come from?

Better understanding how signatures of life and environment are preserved will guide how and where to look for evidence for life elsewhere in the universe — directly supporting the Curiosity mission on Mars and helping set strategic goals for future explorations of solar system and studies of the early Earth.

«This discovery further demonstrates how important interstellar chemistry may be to understanding the creation of biological molecules on the early Earth,» said Jewell.

NASA's Global - Scale Observations of the Limb and Disk (GOLD) instrument was launched into orbit earlier today atop an Ariane 5 rocket, with a mission to shed light on how the uppermost layers of Earth's atmosphere can be affected by powerful space and Earth - based weather events.

The scientists sought to determine the oxidation levels of the magmas that formed these ancient zircons to quantify, for the first time ever, how oxidized were the gases being released early in Earth's history.

To learn more about how the sun and other stars work, after early observations using rockets, scientists began studying the sun from Earth orbit.

«If you look at Earth and how civilization began, we began by building mud houses... so I guess it's pretty logical, at least in the early stages of colonization of Mars, if we can turn the Martian soil into building blocks,» Qiao tells HowStuffWorks.

The CAESAR sample will reveal how these materials contributed to the early Earth, including the origins of the Earth's oceans, and of life.

* Guillaume Gronoff from NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, will discuss how energetic particle events from the young Sun impacted the chemistry of the early Earth's atmosphere and ignited conditions for prebiotic chemistry on early Earth and Mars.

«Origin of life on Earth is one of the greatest puzzles of current science, and in order to understand how it started, we need to examine the evidence from the early Sun, Earth and Mars that is currently available,» said conference chair professor Vladimir Airapetian.

As summarized by geoscientist James Kasting in his 2010 book «How to Find a Habitable Planet»,» [h] abitable zones around Sun - like (F, G, and Early K) stars should be relatively wide because of the natural feedback between atmospheric CO2 [carbon dioxide] levels and climate — the same feedback loop that kept the Earth habitable early its hisEarly K) stars should be relatively wide because of the natural feedback between atmospheric CO2 [carbon dioxide] levels and climate — the same feedback loop that kept the Earth habitable early its hisearly its history.

Jess, I forgot to say earlier, how on earth can you be wearing knee high socks with these boots and leather skirt, and yet look so stunning?