Sentences with phrase «how early man»

Not exact matches

A man in his early 20s sitting in the audience raised his hand and argued passionately about how he didn't think it was a good idea to consort with the competition.
Senator Max Baucus and Representative David Camp, who lead their respective congressional committees on taxation issues, have been working on a bill that they say would be fairer to small businesses, but both men will be leaving those posts in early 2015, so it's unclear how much success they will have.
And here's a sign of how quickly things move in neuroscience: Earlier this year, another paraplegic man, Rodrigo Hübner Mendes, became the first person to drive a race car solely with his mind.
Learn how Pitbull's early - life introduction to Tony Robbins helped transform him into the internationally - renown man he is today.
As an American man of Asian heritage who grew up in Brazil, Lam also explains how an early influx of culture taught him valuable lessons he uses today.
Don't know how old she was that Musa married to at... But understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old... There are still in some small cities, villages and remote areas families are having their daughters marrying at such age to men that could reach upto 80 years old...!
What a great job at looking at how this man's faith, especially in his early years, shaped who he has become.
As Imbruglia notes, the utopian vision of the Paraguayan missions was created by the Jesuits themselves: In widely circulated accounts, Jesuit authors described how once - «savage» Indios «became different men» through their conversion and joined a «perfect society» resembling the early Church.
This is how I would have engaged with your last comment in principle if you were a man and again I apologise for the inadvertent patronising that I was doing by failing to attend to this in my earlier comment.
Much of the history of the world can be understood through this approach to history; and this is to say also that man, in this our own day, can better understand himself and his own day as he sees how his own problems were met by men of an earlier day.
Earlier we had occasion to note the relationship between Jewish faith as portrayed for us in the Old Testament and the Christian event which is the subject matter of the New Testament; and how it was indeed inevitable and right that the primitive Christian community should see their Lord and apprehend his significance for men, against the background of the whole history of the people into whom humanly speaking he was born.
The conclusion to draw from this comment, as Katelyn Beaty noted earlier today on Twitter, is «that gay men should just wake up to how awesome women's body parts are.»
Early man, unaware of such mystical things as provability and objectivity, figured that somebody just like him, but a little smarter, must be responsible for how and why the world worked like it did.
The message of this book is that democratic life should be conceived not as an enterprise of autonomous men, no matter how clever they may be in organizing to pursue their interests, but as a way of realizing the Will of Heaven — that is, of doing the truth and serving the right in which man's proper being and destiny consist, This is another manner of signifying the «public philosophy» earlier mentioned.
In fact it would explain how such an original revelation could endure through the long period of early man, some thousands of years, that is, because the content which was handed down could be grasped perpetually anew.
At one point early in Church history «Christ» was equated with the divine Logos, and there was some disagreement as to how this was related to the man Jesus.
No matter how much evidence we have about Abe the man there isn't any reason or evidence to believe he was an early version of Buffy.
Once we take into account the capacity of the ancient Jewish mind to create a story as a way of expounding and showing the relevance of a Biblical text (this practice will be described in Chapter 9), it is not at all difficult to see how the story of Joseph of Arimathea could have been partly shaped by Isaiah 53:9, «And they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death,» found in the famous chapter on the suffering servant, which was certainly interpreted by the early Christians as a prophecy of the death of Jesus.
• Problems with the Origin of Biological Membranes in an Early Earth Environment • Man, Created in the Image of God - How Man is Unique Among All Other Creatures on Earth
Although Otto's suggestion may possibly throw light upon how the early church could have come to think of Jesus as being the Son of Man, it is a less promising clue to the understanding of how Jesus himself could have come to hold such a view.
The early Ottoman sultans were devout Muslims and good commanders who knew how to surround themselves with men of merit and learning — which is perhaps the main reason for their success in building an empire.
So we underscore what was said earlier: the Bible does not present us with eternal doctrines about God but with a way of seeing how God spoke to men in their histories.
Fr Roger Nesbitt, Chairman o / Faith movement, and Parish Priest of Folkestone shows how the early Fathers harmoniously developed scriptural themes to present the Person of God - made - Man as the necessary completion of creation.
Fr Roger Nesbitt, Chairman o / Faith movement, and Parish Priest of Folkestone shows how the early Fathers harmoniously developed scriptural themes to present the Person of God - made - Man as the...
It was along a line of thought such as this (though I realize that I am grossly over-simplifying a complex and subtle process of reflection on the part of the Christian community) that the dominant problem for theology in the early centuries came to be how to assert that Jesus is our Lord, and hence, since Lordship implies worship and it is idolatry to worship man, how to assert his deity.
(How was it ever conceivable, we ask, that a man like Christian Wolff, in whose dry - as - dust head all the learning of the early eighteenth century was concentrated, should have preserved such a baby - like faith in the personal and human character of Nature as to expound her operations as he did in his work on the uses of natural things?
The earliest Christian literature, deeply and gratefully impressed by the fact that «God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself,» and that the cross was the indispensable factor in that reconciliation, did not at first theorize about how the death of Christ saved men.
To be honest we could have lost the game and thank God we did not there was holes every where on the pitch Arsenal balance was not there for some reason we could have lost the game early on but for a missed pass and we didn't score it was an own goal mind you I still think it wasn't a penalty and monreal saved the day I am glad to have the break and I hope the break will revitalize our form and MR wenger can have a good think about the man u game wounder how lucas is doing would he be ready for man u???
whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch
our pathetic story about arsenal title contenders fade away in a month... and all those shitty players always come out and say how arsenal is fighting for the title (arteta, giroud etc...) time for a new menager, one who will not speaking to the journalists how transfer window should shot down earlier but he is the only one trying to do something in the last day of the transfer window or he is pretending that he is doing something, but no... he flew to the france to be a pundit for france game... I am sick and tired of this man, can't stand it anymore...
That's exactly how Wall used it to freeze Pacers big man Luis Scola in early November.
man, that first fight with GSP reminds me of how Amanda Nunes would blitz and overwhelm early and then fade from mid-round 2 onwards.
no one ordered the man to build a strike force around walcott and giroud or to put a quid on suarez «s asking price or to bring in nogo and park (or perez for that matter) or to sell gnabry and play iwobi regularly or to have ramsey playing in every position bar goalkeeper or to take 7 years to work out how to get the best from Ox or to believe merteshaker was alright for the epl when he was way past his international sell by date or to forego a world class DM for 5 years and then plonk down 30 odd mill on an average swiss international or try out a series of makeshift right backs and hope bellerin would maintain his earlier form and fitness... stan n`chips and co are certainly a shocking example of contemporary football ownership but on the pitch its all down to wenger and his delusions
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
Mourinho will, if the past is an indication and seeing how scared Wenger was of Man U when played them earlier this season, playing not to lose despite Man U not playing very well at the time, will find a way to beat us in the head - to - head, this means we would be 1 point ahead of Man U if Spurs beat us in the head - to - head they are 2 points infront of us.
(3) this team is rotting from the inside out and it's going to take some unprecedented moves on the part of this board and the fans to facilitate the necessary changes... this club must rid itself of it's absentee billionaire landlord before we become just another sporting wasteland in this man's collection of flailing clubs... when this is done it will expose just what exactly has been going on behind the scenes and I'm afraid of what will be uncovered because if Wenger's business model is as antiquated as his football philosophy it could look an awful lot like and old Monty Python sketch in the backroom... we need to replace the owner with someone who actually cares about this club and isn't afraid to wear their emotions on his or her sleeves or spend their own money to achieve greatness... this new owner needs to find someone who represents the same sort of cutting edge that Wenger represented in his early years then pair that individual with someone who knows how to conduct transfers in the modern era... then and only then will we find a way to escape the malaise that has permeated our once storied club for way too many years
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
I suppose it all depends on how reliable this man is and whether he really has got some inside information on the transfer dealings of his former club, but most Arsenal fans will certainly be hoping that the Napoli legend Jose Alberti is right when he says that Gonzalo Higuain will be leaving the Serie A club for Arsenal, not Manchester United as was being reported earlier in the week.
It is still very early days of course, and we have seen from the recent troubles of Man City after a 100 percent start how quickly things can change, but at the minute it looks as though Arsenal and Manchester United are going to be there or thereabouts when the Premier League trophy is handed out in May.
That is how crucial Sanchez's early season form was to the benefit of Arsene Wenger's men.
I think he meant that maybe what Wenger calls injuries are mildly exaggerated... Wenger said it's suicidal for Alexis to want to play on Saturday but he puts in a man of the match performance four days earlier than Saturday, if Chile sent Alexis back like we requested how do we know Wenger won't insist he came back to full mid January?
But Salah had Salah scored earlier it could very well have been a different game, this is one too many hypotheticals though, and the real issue is not how the forwards played — because they were promising before the red card, and Salah continued running behind, to no avail (thanks to the lack of vision from the midfield) before he was substituted at half time — instead it was how the team reacted to being a man and a goal down, away from home, and it brought back memories of that capitulation against Sevilla — Liverpool's next opponent — in the Europa League Final.
With Martin O'Neill watching the man he voted man of the match against Turkey earlier in the week from the London Stadium stands today and Gareth Southgate presumably wondering how the hell England missed him, the Hammers future became its present.
The 3 - 1 win which the Blues picked up last season was followed by a home win, but the victory for Pep's men earlier this term showed how the dynamic has changed between these two.
I couldnt bring myself to comment on the blog since that performance the other night but I read everyones comments and I just have one thing to say; Contrary to some inexplicable reports - Our defence did not play well, Sagna was not what you said Andy he was panicking from start to finish, almost all of his passes were to marked men becasue he hurried the pass because he himself did nt want the responsibility, he put Schezny under unnecessary pressure a couple of times early on, hardly what they guy needed in the circumstances, regardless of how good he is proving to be.
As someone wrote earlier... How would Man Utd fans like it if the media and Citeh fans discussed the possibility of Citeh signing Rooney on a «cash + player» deal and the players being touted where Wright Phillips and Santa Cruz?
Early in the game we can see how our movement opened Stoke's man - marking defence.
Surrey Family Information Services» online leaflet: How men in early years can benefit you and your child.
How can we attract more men into London's Early Years workforce?
The key factor seemed to be their perception of an increased level of awareness in the men as to how they were experiencing the early postpartum weeks.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z