«It's a hard question to answer, because it takes a long time to see
how ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles change.»
«It's a hard question to answer, because it takes a long time to see
how ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles change.»
Not exact matches
Ecologist Knute Nadelhoffer of the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, wanted to explore whether nitrogen fertilization might help explain
how terrestrial
ecosystems store 1800 - billion kilograms of
carbon each year.
A crucial reason why the study of freshwater acidification has lagged until now is because determining
how atmospheric
carbon affects these
ecosystems requires complex modeling, and is much less clear than that occurring in oceans, according to study author Linda Weiss, an aquatic ecologist at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany.
In particular, a delay in when leaves change color could affect
how much
carbon an
ecosystem removes from the atmosphere, which would partially combat the climate change that caused the delay in the first place, he said.
Model simulations can always be improved by testing predictions against field data collected from different
ecosystems, and Sulman and Phillips are doing just that: investigating
how roots influence soil decomposition and protected forms of
carbon in forests that vary in the composition of tree and microbial communities.
«The Paleocene - Eocene thermal maximum has stood out as a striking, but contested, example of
how 21st - century - style atmospheric
carbon dioxide buildup can affect climate, environments and
ecosystems worldwide,» says Bowen, an associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah.
Despite their role as potential sinks — or storehouses — of
carbon, it is still unclear
how different biophysical processes influence
carbon dynamics in these
ecosystems.
Professor Cox, from the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences said «The year - to - year variation in
carbon dioxide concentration is a very useful way to monitor
how tropical
ecosystems are responding to climate.
To make this assessment, Sutton - Grier and her colleagues evaluated
how effectively each
ecosystem captures
carbon dioxide — for example, by plants using it to build their branches and leaves — and
how long the
carbon is stored, either in plant tissues or in soils.
There, he used computer modeling and field data to elucidate
how forest
ecosystems store and recycle
carbon and to compare alternative theories for species coexistence.
«This study is further evidence that the diversity and makeup of the vegetation, and the soil organisms beneath our feet are vitally important in controlling
how much
carbon is locked up or released from these
carbon rich
ecosystems.»
The team used DayCent, an
ecosystem modeling tool that tracks the
carbon cycle, plant growth, and
how growth responds to weather, climate and other factors at a local scale.
Keiluweit, assistant professor in UMass Amherst's School of Earth and Sustainability, says the team's next steps include quantifying the amount of anaerobic microsites in different soil
ecosystems and assessing
how carbon stabilization in them is affected by variables such as the soil hydrologic regime, which is expected to change dramatically due to climate change.
Researchers say that much more work is needed to understand
how nutrient dynamics will affect
carbon uptake — particularly in forest
ecosystems, which are expected to be important
carbon sinks.
The study has important implications for predicting which arctic plant species will dominate as the climate warms, as well as
how much
carbon tundra
ecosystems can store.
«The shrimp cocktail is a good example of
how carbon cost associated with mangrove degradation way outweighs the actual product that is produced,» Emily Pidgeon of Conservation International told the audience at a session entitled «Blue
Carbon, Green Opportunities: Innovative Solutions To Protect Coastal
Ecosystems.»
If a balance was established and the system could be reliably controlled, it would be possible to alter the amount of
carbon dioxide to simulate conditions of global warming, then analyse
how ecosystems respond.
«In order to predict
how ecosystems will react when you heat up the planet or acidify the ocean, we first need to understand the mechanisms of everyday
carbon cycling — who's involved and
how are they doing it?»
«Our study is about
how a whole forest
ecosystem consumes and produces
carbon dioxide, or CO2, the main greenhouse gas linked to human - induced climate change,» says Wehr, a research associate in Saleska's lab in the UA's Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
But the document also emphasizes the need to study
how carbon cycles through
ecosystems, a category that encompasses Bowen, Sanderman and Saleska's projects.
GEDI's vegetation measurements will help close a critical gap in our current understanding of
how carbon is stored and emitted over time by forests and other
ecosystems.
The other aspect and something that I work on is increasingly trying to look at the interactions between climate and
ecosystems, and if what that allows us to do is to inform climate negotiations around things like
carbon budgets, so
how much CO2 can we emit to stay within a certain target.
If a large amount of nitrogen comes from rocks, it helps explain
how natural
ecosystems like boreal forests are capable of taking up high levels of
carbon dioxide.
However, this in itself is not enough to define what level of warming is «dangerous,» especially since the projections of actual impacts for any level of warming are highly uncertain, and depend on further factors such as
how quickly these levels are reached (so
how long
ecosystems and society have had to respond), and what other changes are associated with them (eg:
carbon dioxide concentration, since this affects plant photosynthesis and water use efficiency, and ocean acidification).
2013 —
How ecological restoration alters
ecosystem services: an analysis of
carbon sequestration in China's Loess Plateau As a result, the Loess Plateau
ecosystem had shifted from a net
carbon source in 2000 to a net
carbon sink in 2008.
Our food choices affect
ecosystem health,
how harvesters and factory workers are treated, the health of farm workers, which foods are grown and sold,
how humanely animals are treated, and even
how much
carbon dioxide and methane are released into the atmosphere.
The study shows that satellite observations of atmospheric
carbon dioxide levels are a useful tool toward understanding
how semiarid
ecosystems will respond to climate change in the future.
«These forests matter to the rest of us on Earth because of
how they help regulate climate by keeping
carbon in the soil and in the trees and out of the atmosphere,» says Peter Griffith, founding director of NASA's
Carbon Cycle and
Ecosystems Office.
Joanie Kleypas is a marine scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, who investigates
how rising atmospheric
carbon dioxide is affecting marine
ecosystems.
In collaboration with academics, the WCMC has been looking at
how the
carbon and biodiversity values of an
ecosystem are related.
In Ecuador, the Team brought in experts from the Environmental Law Center of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, and RISAS, a Quito, Ecuador - based PES network for an open forum and closed - door meeting with Ecuador's Ministry of Environment on
how to use payments for
ecosystem services and
carbon trading to foster forest preservation.
Koven and colleagues set out to estimate
how much
carbon dioxide and methane (which contains
carbon) could be released by boreal and Arctic land
ecosystems as a result of climate change.
The scientists modified a land surface
ecosystem model called ORCHIDEE to account for
how carbon behaves at different layers, such as at the surface versus 30 centimeters below ground.
Using computer models to project
how warmer temperatures will affect
carbon storage across each Alaskan
ecosystem, USGS researchers found that the warming climate is likely to spur more new tree growth in southern Alaska.
US CLIVAR is collaborating with the ocean
carbon and biogeochemistry science community to increase observations and understanding of the coupled physical / biogeochemical processes that maintain the marine
ecosystem and oceanic sources and sinks of
carbon and predict
how they will evolve in response to climate variability and change.
Developing an Infrastructure Fund for the Planet explored
how ecosystem service payments and markets in
carbon, water and biodiversity are quickly becoming a key solution to the urgent environmental problems of climate change, fresh water pollution, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, and destruction of our coastal and marine systems.
Researchers say that much more work is needed to understand
how nutrient dynamics will affect
carbon uptake — particularly in forest
ecosystems, which are expected to be important
carbon sinks.
While the primary contribution is in improving our ability to anticipate
how earth system interactions will modulate the rate of increase of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the fact that the models require simulation of land and ocean
ecosystems make them extremely valuable for a range of applications in
ecosystem impacts and feedbacks as well.
During a 2003 heat wave that struck central and southern Europe, scientists documented
how the extreme heat affected the
carbon cycle — the exchange of
carbon dioxide between
ecosystems, such as forests, and the atmosphere.
Improve understanding of
how AMOC variability affects ocean - atmosphere exchanges of
carbon, biogeochemical cycles, and marine
ecosystems.
While models typically take into account
how plants and microbes affect the
carbon cycle, they often underestimate
how much animals can indirectly alter the absorption, release, or transport of
carbon within an
ecosystem, says Oswald Schmitz, the Oastler Professor of Population and Community Ecology at F&ES and lead author of the paper.
«Mangroves have long been known as extremely productive
ecosystems that cycle
carbon quickly, but until now there had been no estimate of
how much
carbon resides in these systems.
The site, designed to exploit grasslands as models for understanding
how ecosystems may respond to climate change, hosts a number of studies of the potential effects from elevated atmospheric
carbon dioxide, elevated temperature, increased precipitation, and increased nitrogen deposition.
Now the researchers say that forest recovery after disturbance is likely to be a big issue, especially
how much
carbon will return back to forest
ecosystem due to the regrowth.