The reason that section 6 on standards was put into the Uniform Act was to try to ensure that such standards would be read broadly, toinclude if need be these private agreements on
how electronic evidence would be handled.
Not exact matches
We synthesised this
evidence to learn
how online dating could be improved, maximising the chances of converting
electronic communication into a face - to - face meeting.
R. v. Nde Soh is important because the Court accepted the need to receive
evidence on the issue of admissibility as to
how the computer system that produced the «
electronic documents» worked.
The problem is compounded in the UK by the absence of detailed guidance in the Civil Procedure Rules about
how to deal with
electronic evidence.
Instead, deciding
how to preserve
electronic evidence is a balancing exercise that involves comparing the cost of different methodologies with the importance of the
evidence to be preserved.
The best
evidence, however, is an April 2, 1994, news article in The Baltimore Sun, Lawyers in Cyberspace, about
how Venable «recently hung out an
electronic shingle as a publisher on the Internet — making articles by its lawyers available worldwide to users of the far - flung network of computer networks.»
And therefore,
how can the Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing
Electronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
Electronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of
electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an
electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the
Evidence Acts?
The Uniform
Electronic Evidence Act says how to apply the «best evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic
Electronic Evidence Act says how to apply the «best evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic do
Evidence Act says
how to apply the «best
evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic do
evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to
electronic electronic documents.
It took five separate rulings and hundreds of dense pages of balancing tests, analysis and orders just to figure out what
electronic evidence was discoverable;
how the cost of retrieving, copying and distributing
electronic records should be shared among parties; and whether sanctions should be imposed for failing to produce
evidence.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(2) mandates that lawyers meet and confer about discovery issues and agree on
how to handle
electronic evidence.
This appeal requires an examination of the effect of
electronic record management on the laws of
evidence, which were formulated on different assumptions about
how records are kept.
Their next step is determining
how to fully integrate technology to have a true
electronic trial (where all processes from filing to the rendering of the decision are processed and all records are accessed electronically) rather than one which simply uses
electronic evidence presented in the courtroom.
Given the ubiquity of
electronic records in our society over the past two or three decades, it is surprising
how few cases have dealt with their admission in
evidence.
But as counsel hand up CDs of scanned documents or USB drives with
electronic evidence, as
electronic appeal books are copied onto court networks, or as pleadings are uploaded to e-filing systems,
how much thought is put into the security of all that information?
For those courtrooms your first decision will be
how to display your
electronic evidence or submissions.
The
Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge and Engine have submitted comments [PDF] to the US Patent and Trademark Office explaining
how examiners could improve the quality of patents that the USPTO issues by expanding their search for «prior art» (that is,
evidence that the thing under discussion has already been...