Sentences with phrase «how electronic evidence»

The reason that section 6 on standards was put into the Uniform Act was to try to ensure that such standards would be read broadly, toinclude if need be these private agreements on how electronic evidence would be handled.

Not exact matches

We synthesised this evidence to learn how online dating could be improved, maximising the chances of converting electronic communication into a face - to - face meeting.
R. v. Nde Soh is important because the Court accepted the need to receive evidence on the issue of admissibility as to how the computer system that produced the «electronic documents» worked.
The problem is compounded in the UK by the absence of detailed guidance in the Civil Procedure Rules about how to deal with electronic evidence.
Instead, deciding how to preserve electronic evidence is a balancing exercise that involves comparing the cost of different methodologies with the importance of the evidence to be preserved.
The best evidence, however, is an April 2, 1994, news article in The Baltimore Sun, Lawyers in Cyberspace, about how Venable «recently hung out an electronic shingle as a publisher on the Internet — making articles by its lawyers available worldwide to users of the far - flung network of computer networks.»
And therefore, how can the Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the EvidElectronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evidelectronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evidelectronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evidence Acts?
The Uniform Electronic Evidence Act says how to apply the «best evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic Electronic Evidence Act says how to apply the «best evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic doEvidence Act says how to apply the «best evidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic doevidence» rule (which normally requires an original document, or a good explanation for the absence of the original) to electronic electronic documents.
It took five separate rulings and hundreds of dense pages of balancing tests, analysis and orders just to figure out what electronic evidence was discoverable; how the cost of retrieving, copying and distributing electronic records should be shared among parties; and whether sanctions should be imposed for failing to produce evidence.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(2) mandates that lawyers meet and confer about discovery issues and agree on how to handle electronic evidence.
This appeal requires an examination of the effect of electronic record management on the laws of evidence, which were formulated on different assumptions about how records are kept.
Their next step is determining how to fully integrate technology to have a true electronic trial (where all processes from filing to the rendering of the decision are processed and all records are accessed electronically) rather than one which simply uses electronic evidence presented in the courtroom.
Given the ubiquity of electronic records in our society over the past two or three decades, it is surprising how few cases have dealt with their admission in evidence.
But as counsel hand up CDs of scanned documents or USB drives with electronic evidence, as electronic appeal books are copied onto court networks, or as pleadings are uploaded to e-filing systems, how much thought is put into the security of all that information?
For those courtrooms your first decision will be how to display your electronic evidence or submissions.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge and Engine have submitted comments [PDF] to the US Patent and Trademark Office explaining how examiners could improve the quality of patents that the USPTO issues by expanding their search for «prior art» (that is, evidence that the thing under discussion has already been...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z