A broad and powerful coalition working together — LGBT and straight, upstate and downstate, Republican and Democrat, people of faith, business leaders, organized labor, people of color — this is
how equality and justice will be achieved.
Not exact matches
Ironically, I have had, in the days since you posted this cartoon, multiple relatives
and «friends» who profess their Christianity from the mountaintops, let me know just
how vile I am for not adhering to their thoughts on marriage
equality, social
justice, poverty, the oil spill, the President... you name it.
In response to our coordinate efforts for Mutuality 2012, I have heard from women who say they feel their dignity
and worth have been restored, from multiple readers who have changed their minds about women in ministry, from couples relieved that they can finally put a name to
how their relationship has functioned all along, from singles freshly inspired by the «great cloud of witnesses» that surrounds them, from followers of Jesus whose passion for
justice and equality has been renewed, from women ready to «get on with it»
and stop asking permission to use their gifts
and start unapologetically using them.
It was pragmatic in the sense that it becomes increasingly aware of the contingent circumstances of history which determine
how much or
how little it is necessary to emphasize» such regulative principles as
justice,
equality and liberty.
Smith's response is worth reading, as an early exercise in that question of religious faith
and national loyalty that continues to be asked of Catholics, if today usually in indirect but more aggressive ways, like «
How could you refuse our version of
equality and justice and not provide contraceptives to your employees?»
But
Justice Kennedy could not be bothered with sorting out just which level of scrutiny should apply, or
how the Court's Fifth
and Fourteenth Amendment precedents on
equality bore on the case at hand.
In any case, we either all enjoy «equal
justice under the law», whether male or female,
and no matter
how large or small, athlete or not, or we just toss the idea of
equality out the window
and say that it's all going to be arbitrary.
The second question is related to the above: a «free market» baseline of
justice is about procedure -
how outcomes are arrived at, who is involved in making decisions, has rights over their own actions,
how actions are agreed by parties etc. (or something like that) whereas
equality is an outcome, that may or may not be achieved under various procedural arrangements,
and may or may not be viewed as desirable by people who hold different views about what forms of society - specifications over who has what rights to do what to who.
His PD declares to pursue
equality and justice — but
how does it interpret
and enact these principles?
To wit, D'Souza goes to the Democrat Party Headquarters
and compares their platform of
equality and social
justice to their history of supporting slavery
and opposing equal rights,
and how they've been able to rebrand themselves by denying their transgressions
and recycling their tactics of intimidation.
In Young Mr Lincoln (1939) director John Ford
and actor Henry Fonda used a relatively minor episode in Lincoln's life to demonstrate far more convincingly
and compelling
how his personal convictions about
equality,
justice and democracy influenced his actions.
The International Day of Peace is a great opportunity to think about
how, individually, each
and every one of us can contribute to ensuring that resources are managed in a sustainable way, fostering values such as
equality, social
justice,
and fraternity
and thus reducing the potential for disputes
and paving the road to a sustainable future.
But I trust that as a democrat, the party that stands for racial
justice and equality of opportunity, he will see that the right question is whether a public school is successful
and equally available to all, not
how it came into being.
Meanwhile,
Justice minister Dominic Raab has confirmed that the government will table an amendment before report stage requiring ministers presenting any Brexit - related primary or secondary legislation to first make a statement on whether
and how it is consistent with the
Equalities Act.
«
How we treat those who have made mistakes speaks to who we are as a society and is a statement about our values — about our dedication to fairness, equality and justice, about how to protect our families and communities from harm, heal after loss and trauma and lift back up those among us who have earned a chance at redemption.&raq
How we treat those who have made mistakes speaks to who we are as a society
and is a statement about our values — about our dedication to fairness,
equality and justice, about
how to protect our families and communities from harm, heal after loss and trauma and lift back up those among us who have earned a chance at redemption.&raq
how to protect our families
and communities from harm, heal after loss
and trauma
and lift back up those among us who have earned a chance at redemption.»
A number of case studies explore the issues of
justice, health
equality and remote communities to demonstrate
how Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander peoples
and representative bodies might be able to develop their own indicators for monitoring the progress of the UPR over the next four years.