Sentences with phrase «how flattering the trend»

At first, I didn't care for the hi - low hemline trend, but once I tried on this dress, I discovered how flattering the trend is.

Not exact matches

Today I am telling you all about a cool brand called Signorelli which makes the sweatshirt I am wearing (I also picked up this sweatshirt too) I love how the shirts are vintage feeling with a lived - in vibe; complete will pilling... they feature on - trend designs, the fit is flattering, and they're so cozy!

I really love all these boots too, but I don't know how they look on girls with pretty wide hips like myself... any thoughts on how to stay on trend and still be figure flattering?

A lot of women need detailed instructions, principles, rules, lessons on how to create flattering, on - trend looks.

I was talking about how much I love this flat shoes trend, but wearing military lace up boots with layered cami dress and biker jacket was my dream outfit.

The Queen Bee really knows how to flatter her figure as she works with trend.

Don't worry about the latest trend, just find the best shapes to flatter your Body Type and if you have one or two particular parts of your figure that cause bother, then solve them by learning how to Dress your OWN figure.

This is such a classic outfit, I really like how you don't follow the typical trends and dress to flatter your figure:)

HOW TO WEAR IT THE LOOK Dress DKNY Runway Color blocked Dress, $ 413.37; www.dkny.com WHY WE CA N'T GET ENOUGH Truly a flattering colour combination for every body type, this trend can combine textures, and fabrics and act as a backdrop for bolder accessories read more

And if you're still in that same place I was and you just don't know how to wear this cropped trend, a comfortable, flattering pair of high - waisted jeans with the perfect fit like these Levi's is a great place to start.

So I'd love to hear about how to rock trends that aren't «flattering» on you — I just embrace the drapey trend without feeling like I have to create boobs, and it's awesome.

How do I answer the sceptics / deniers who utilise the cooling since 1998, matched with the trend lines in the IPCC reports that show warming climbing while the reality is cooling or at least flat lining?

Note, for example, how the temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st century was generally flat because an upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the atmosphere (sea water temperatures continued to rise).»

This will probably show an almost flat trend, possibly still with a bit of warming (depending how this year works out).

How much healthier might the nation have been if these trends had been reversed (even if NIH funding had stayed flat!)?

We could know how likely a fifteen - year flat five - year mean trend would be to reflect an end to the 30 - year warming trend.

For example, it's not statistically valid for me to claim that there's significant warming in the 1998 - 2009 monthly data I show above because the R2 (representing how noisy the data is compared to the linear trend in time) is too low to draw any valid conclusions beyond «it's effectively flat.»

Granted, surface temperatures have only been measured since the 1950s on Antarctica, however, it would be interesting to see how well the climate models reproduced the flat or slightly cooling trend on Antarctica for the last 50 years as presented in TS.22.

The ariticle referenced, while still towing the standard political line, states clearly that no matter how you look at it the temperature trend over the last decade is flat or negative - in direct contradiction to the assertions of this blog and further pointing out the incorrect stance of the blogger.

A flat line with slope of 0 containing a million data points satisfies your criterion of «non statistically significant trend over a period long enough for the statistical power of the test to be 95 %» but I can't see how it's relevant to the discussion.

But I thought it was a little sketchy that while possibly trying to make hay of how a well placed trend line can make an effect appear to come into being (the flat line of «the pause») or disappear (as it does here), he neglected to mention that the trend he used to do his work was so shallow that, in any other context, he or any of his regular readers would instinctively argue against it, which actually happened in responses to my original comment.

The model outputs are generally presented as an average of an ensemble of individual runs (and even ensembles of individual runs from multiple models), in order to remove this variability from the overall picture, because among grownups it is understood that 1) the long term trends are what we're interested and 2) the coarseness of our measurements of initial conditions combined with a finite modeled grid size means that models can not predict precisely when and how temps will vary around a trend in the real world (they can, however, by being run many times, give us a good idea of the * magnitude * of that variance, including how many years of flat or declining temperatures we might expect to see pop up from time to time).

Over the course of 1 year, the comparison group of mothers followed a relatively flat change trajectory (the expected developmental trend in absence of an intervention), whereas Home - Start mothers displayed positive changes regarding how they felt about themselves as a parent.