Sentences with phrase «how flawed the science»

Not exact matches

By the way, Hawking's book is a great example at how David's passionate view that Science is adjusted to reflect flaws and contradictions is nonsense.

Scientists are people, they are flawed, and I'm pretty sure God did not provide us with the mental ability to fully understand how he pulled everything off, but either way, In General science spends it's time trying to figure out how God did it... not why... you want to know why... I propose to you, as you suggested I open another book and learn, i propose you open a Bible and learn why God Created you.

Hester van Santen reveals how the gate - keepers of science knowingly let flawed research slip through.

Science is meanwhile using the traits of the flawed being to contemplate how to utilize bionics, marine biology and microbiology to copy animals, plants and the rest of the environment.

How did a deeply flawed paper, which contradicts mainstream science on climate change, pass peer review?

Bryan Walsh published an article in the June issue of Time magazine called «Ending the War on Fat,» that explored both the history of how fat has been classified as the nutritional public enemy number one, and how this science was flawed.

But this is why J Cook is important, because he promotes awareness of how deceitful climate denialists are, rather than just talking only about the science flaws in what they say.

In Science Insider, the news section of the journal Science, Carolyn Gramling included this tough line: «But how influential this paper will be is unclear, given its flaws.»

There's a troubling section, however, in which Mann creates a flawed dichotomy, hailing a paper by James Hansen and Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University (and others) pressing for deep carbon cuts and criticizing a peer, * Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution, for complaining that the paper failed the Stephen Schneider / Gavin Schmidt test for distinguishing between the «is» of science and the «ought» determined by individual feelings about the state of the world and how to shape it.

In 2001, I learned just how flawed the «parks and fences» model could be when I reported on a Science paper showing how the creation of a panda preserve backfired.

How did a deeply flawed paper, which contradicts mainstream science on...

So I'd like to throw this back to you Geoff — if things like the NEP are flawed, and if you see our scales for measuring climate change scepticism and its relationship to ideology as not capturing the essence of why people are sceptical about climate change, how should social science seek to understand people's beliefs about the environment and climate change?

To bear witness to how damaging the flawed processes have been in climate science, I strongly recommend reading the refined essay by Professor Lindzen titled «Climate science — is it currently designed to answer questions?»

Instead what should rightfully evoke our greatest concern is how climate change alarmism is eroding objective science, allowing untestable hypotheses and flawed models to become codified in our legal system.

Besides variation in the amount of material picked up into the atmosphere, consider how rates of evaporation vary — but that is yet another major flaw in the CRU / IPCC climate science.

Climate scientists have become so talebanically fanatical about crushing resistance to a flawed hypothesis that they want to be a fact that they do not care how much damage they do to science.

But this recent spate of errors also points to more fundamental flaws in how the UN panel assesses climate science, leading to intensified calls for its reform in recent weeks.

For a much more detailed discussion of a sceptical scientist's view of the validity of using model output as the basis for policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawed:

How can one escape from the Iron Triangle when it produces flawed science that is immensely influential and is forcing catastrophic public policy?