The chart below displays, district by district,
how funding per pupil differed from the national average in 2016.
Not exact matches
These include the very modest
per -
pupil sums it would entail, the question of
how to push states to comply, and the likelihood that critics would contend that the plan would functionally steer federal
funds away from some of the nation's poorest schools.
You will also be able to see
how much
per pupil funding the district currently receives,
how much new
funding it will receive under the new formula, and
how much more
funding it needs to serve its students.
The LEA then estimates
how much instructional
funding eligible private school students would have generated in their zoned public school had they attended, using the same
per -
pupil amount spent in the public school.
It went on to highlight the report's finding that «[d] ifferences in state scores for students with similar families can be explained, in part, by
per -
pupil expenditures and
how these
funds are allocated.»
This reallocation of
how much money goes to each school has been promised for 2017 and is a response to many years of campaigning over uneven levels of
per pupil funding.
Not only is it important for parents and stakeholders to know
how much money is spent
per pupil / student, but it's equally important to know
how funds are used to support the total school program.
: The worst student to teacher ratios in the country; near the worst
per pupil funding in the US; low starting salary schedules that shortchange new teachers so the oldest teachers can be overpaid, though all do the same work; LIFO policies so that younger teachers are always fired first no matter
how good they are and no matter
how poor senior teachers are; teacher layoffs expected at every recession, with waves of recessions expected indefinitely; bad
funding in the absence of recessions and worse
funding in recessions; constant loading with additional requirements and expectations; poor and worsening teacher morale; poor and worsening working conditions; ugly architecturally uninspired facilities and often trashy temporary classrooms; inadequate learning materials, resources and technology; inadequate administrative support with the worst student / administrator ratios in the county; inadequate librarian, psychologist, behavioral specialist, counselor, nurse support due to the worst ratios; inadequate student discipline structures; and much more...
How will this «unprecedented» level of
funding help improve our national status as 44th in
per -
pupil spending?
And while discussing
per -
pupil funding, let's acknowledge
how abysmal it has been for the last decade despite constant claims by Governor Scott, Speaker Corcoran, and Senate President Joe Negron that this year's «record - level» $ 7,408
per -
pupil amount is «unprecendented» and «historic»; adjusted for inflation, the $ 7,126 from 2007 - 2008 would need to be $ 8,415 to have the equivalent purchasing power, a fact anyone can check with the U.S. Department of Labor's CPI Inflation Calculator.
The definite part of the department's approach is that real - terms
funding per pupil will drop over the coming years; the uncertain part is
how schools are able to respond based on their particular circumstances,» the report says.