Not exact matches
Rachelle Lefevre is from Revolution and plays pretty much the same type of
character she did in that show and its very
generic so i have no idea
how much she can bring to her work.
Much like The Meddler, Going in Style, and Hello, My Name is Doris, these
characters are written with that
generic «old people» type humor where they are a bit more conservative and they don't know
how to use social media or take social cues.
It's a script that's bursting with clichés and not - so - surprising revelations that many of these supporting
characters fall victim to this and feel like
generic characters you would find in a «
how to write a family legal drama» manual.
Why is there this perceived need to have a plot, no matter
how generic, in
character - driven movies like this?
To some extent, my alpha reader is like that, in that we talk about the world and
characters from every perspective, but the discussion is still more about finding holes (what if this happened, can that happen,
how does that work) than
generic «that's so cool» observations.
It feels like they replaced an interesting
character (regardless of
how anyone else felt about him) with the most
generic «fight the power»
character they possibly could... I hope I'm wrong... we'll see.
Every episode starts with the bland,
generic characters playing the game (actually mostly just standing around in the game) then ends with the
characters talking about
how awesome the game is.
Gone is the rather
generic east - west urban mashup of previous titles, to be replaced with a suitably Hawaiian theme for the
characters,
how they dress and the landscape they inhabit.
But it's easy to forget that despite
how smooshed and faded
characters» heads look, this was the first time (I think) where the hoardes of
generic guards actually had different faces.
They are also given a life bar with three different colors (symbolizing
how «healthy» the
character is), a time limit, and a relatively
generic score indicator that goes up to 99 million points.