(March 21, 2011) Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller explains
how global warming proponents manipulated data in order to create the illusion of rapidly increasing global temperatures.
Not exact matches
As the scientific case for a climate - change catastrophe wanes,
proponents of big - ticket climate policies are increasingly focused on punishing dissent from an asserted «consensus» view that the only way to address
global warming is to restructure society —
how it harnesses and uses energy.
Proponents of the CAGW gloom and doom disaster scenarios often say that we need to «connect the dots» to understand
how CO2 emissions are causing dangerous «accelerated»
global warming.
Was there runaway
global warming, and, if so,
how did life forms manage to evolve in what AGW
proponents argue should have been extremely hostile conditions?
Also, since you agree with P&O's description of
how the greenhouse effect works (i.e. downward long - wave radiation
warms the lower atmosphere and the ground), will you retract statements like the following «-LSB-...] I demonstrate that the down - welling radiation hypothesis divulged by the
proponents of the anthropogenic
global warming [is] incompatible with the laws of thermodynamics.»