Sentences with phrase «how high god»

Not exact matches

Just as we tell our earthly friends how much we appreciate them and are thankful for them, we do the same with God — to the highest degree.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

How is it that an inspired woman could write scripture (e.g., Mary's song), and an inspired woman could determine for both a king and a high priest whether something is scripture (e.g., the prophet Huldah in 2 Kings 22 and 2 Chronicles 34)-- or at least could do these things in the time of the Old Testament — but an inspired woman can not now teach about God?

To go about talking about how low and depraved you are because God, which exists in your imagination, sets impossibly high standards for you.

How high does that place him on the hierarchy relative to God?

Strange that the Son of God didn't realize you can't see the entire surface of the round earth from any one mountain peak, no matter how high it is.

Including how every single male would not even be worthy to practice «God's highest ideal» in the first place, or even lived in a time where it was sanctioned to do so.

It was bizarre how people would be written off by the «Great men of God» declaring in their fake humility voice in some high level meetings: She (sometimes «he» is emotionally unstable.

However, Jesus placed a higher priority on a different question — how do we show perfect impartiality towards those we (or God) calls evil and those we (or God) calls good?

God, you're so feckin» stupid I can't figure out how you even graduated from high school, much less got into a college.

One day a youth asked him why he believed in God, and he answered, «Once I saw a boy flying a kite which had gone so high that it was invisible, and I said to him, «How do you know there is any kite there at all?»

I wanted to know how other people who were «genuinely» agnostic and who may also not share a belief in a god or higher power worked their programme.

Another test for the church is how far it can build an accepting fellowship where people can articulate their own experience of God in Christ This again raises questions about the future organization of the institutional church and whether it can or should maintain its present hierarchical structure where authority seems to come down from on high.

This distinction can be applied to the relation of God and the world in a way which indicates how some events can be «acts of God» to a higher degree than others are.

It's only when we focus the two images into one that we gain spiritual «depth perception» and begin to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of God.»

I have it on good authority he said «My wife... is such a comedian, always cracking up the apostles with her naughty jokes... Like did you hear the one she told about the Priest the Rabbi and the Pastor who were discussing how they apporting their collections and the Priest says «We go into the parking lot and draw a circle on the ground and throw all the money up and any that lands in the circle we give to God» and the Pastor says «Yeah, we do almost the same thing but give God anything that falls outside the circle» and the Rabbi looks at them both and says «We do almost the same thing to, draw a circle and throw up the money high into the air and God keeps what God wants...»

It may seem somewhat trite to invoke the freedom of creation as part of the works and ends of divine love, or to argue that the highest good of the creature — divinizing union with God in love — requires a realm of «secondary causality» in which the rational wills of God's creatures are at liberty; nonetheless, whether the traditional explanations of how sin and death have been set loose in the world satisfy one or not, they certainly render the claim that an omnipotent and good God would never allow unjust suffering simply vacuous.

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

«The Maasai speak of a journey of faith in a God who out of love created the world and us, of how they once knew the High God in darkness but now they know this God in the light.

Darwin ripped the heart out of one of the God of the Gaps arguments (i.e. we don't know how complex life forms arose, therefore the Judeo - Christian god did it) but Hubble showed that the whole idea of there being any cosmic importance to planet Earth is naked parochialism to the highest mathematical degree possibGod of the Gaps arguments (i.e. we don't know how complex life forms arose, therefore the Judeo - Christian god did it) but Hubble showed that the whole idea of there being any cosmic importance to planet Earth is naked parochialism to the highest mathematical degree possibgod did it) but Hubble showed that the whole idea of there being any cosmic importance to planet Earth is naked parochialism to the highest mathematical degree possible.

But if it doesn't — like when it talks about the anger of God, or repentance, or gay sex, or divorce — then we can emphasise its humanness, point out the limited knowledge of the writer, explain how they came to be so silly, and move beyond the text to a supposedly higher ethical standard.

This renders poetically an understanding in process theology, in the twentieth century, of how our openness to God's initial aim for us moment by moment empowers us for further and greater responses to even higher aims.

As a Christian believer (but not an alcoholic) I am very intrigued with how the AA program uses God, or a higher power, to help people through an unbelievably hard addiction.

«We still need good theology... so we do need good theological colleges with well - trained, committed faculty members, able to publish and supervise higher research; where academic rigour is maintained and we continue to discern how God's word in the Bible speaks today.

When I was in High School, I had a teacher who read 1 Corinthians 9:27 in class (I attended a Christian school), and said that all of us need to be careful how we live our lives, or else we could end up in hell if we disobeyed God.

How we tore families apart, how we treated people that wouldn't convert and how numbers where higher than god when it came to baptisHow we tore families apart, how we treated people that wouldn't convert and how numbers where higher than god when it came to baptishow we treated people that wouldn't convert and how numbers where higher than god when it came to baptishow numbers where higher than god when it came to baptisms.

How else will God know our love unless we take the high risk — with all its seeming lack of logic, sense, practicality, etc.?!! How else will the Universe know where to put its support if we aren't hanging out there, ready to accept it?

When discussing how God «fully appropriates every feeling of value there is,» Hartshorne states: «The highest intrinsic value must be the value of the most perfect and inclusive form of love» (OOTM 81).

its called free will... and each lifetime we live, we have the opportunity to raise our thinking (and vibration) to a higher plane of consciousness... This is how we finally become one with God, when we no longer vibrate at the physical plane but at the highest plane of pure conscious energy...

However, I am more spiritual than religions, as Spirituality is a relationship with a higher power, whereas Religion is a man made construct to tell others how to worship a specific version of God

Around junior high I had a hard time with the concept of hell and how a God who supposedly loves all his children could condemn anyone to hell indefinitely... over time I stopped believing in the religion entirely.

As is evident, these questions raise all sorts of fundamental issues for Christian theology: about God, about «revelation,» about the decisiveness of the event of Christ — and corresponding questions for members of each of the other faiths (e.g., how veridical or «absolute» in this context is the «higher level of consciousness» of the Buddhists?).

J. E. Barnhart comes the closest to articulating the concerns of high Christology as to how God

I have no idea how he is so high in polls, or even still in the race, but his ideas are not only dangerous for the founding principles of the US, but it is also potentially dangerous for atheists, agnostics, pagans, and others who do not believe in an Abrahamic god.

How, in God's name, is such a weak, ignorant, foolish individual entrusted with the rites of priesthood when this crime has happened so much for so long — how is it possible that the Pope, or any Bishop, or any Priest could say such a stupid thing as the child seduces the adult who is entrusted with upholding the highest morals of aHow, in God's name, is such a weak, ignorant, foolish individual entrusted with the rites of priesthood when this crime has happened so much for so long — how is it possible that the Pope, or any Bishop, or any Priest could say such a stupid thing as the child seduces the adult who is entrusted with upholding the highest morals of ahow is it possible that the Pope, or any Bishop, or any Priest could say such a stupid thing as the child seduces the adult who is entrusted with upholding the highest morals of all?

I had often heard «God's ways are not like ours» to describe the problem of eternal torture for temporal sins, but I didn't understand how hell was indicative of a higher way when it was something that struck me as abhorrent.

When one of my friends was in high school, a teacher who learned he was a Christian asked him, «How can you believe in a God who forgives murderers?»

The critical tasks of our time: teaching us how, while loving freedom, to mandate high standards of behavior; and how, while maintaining God's truth, to accommodate variety and dissent.

Few theological tasks could be as critical for our time as these: teaching us how, while loving freedom, to mandate high standards of behavior; and how, while maintaining God's truth, to accommodate variety and dissent.

For example, when someone I went to high school with and had not spoken to in 20 years found out I was a SAHD, he took it upon himself to send me email after email about how I was acting outside of God's will.

I'm not sure how the Christian and AA surrender to a higher power / god works with a rational thinking atheist who realizes that there is no such thing.

I don't know when or how I lost myself in him but the breakup we had brought me so much freedom and finding myself in God allowed me to go even higher in the Kingdom of God, its funny how He will allow us to go through something to see what we really are capable of.

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

With that in mind, I have noticed that many, if not most new converts can have, in all appearances, a genuine spiritual experience before any high doctrine of «scriptural authority ever enters their head.Now, some may say that just how it works, first you crawl, then you walk... baby food, then the meat, but this is my point... the world is full of «spiritual meatheads»... there are so many believers who wdn't know an original thought, unless of course, they cd find the chapter and verse to unequivocally support it.Is it so difficult to comprehend how a collection of ancient documents may not be the final, complete and indisputable Word of God, but mere human artifacts, sometimes godly, sometimes not, sometimes helping, sometimes hindering.?

How many times does the most high God have to keep destroying an earthly church from above?

MacArthur has set himself up as a higher authority on how to worship God.

The biggest gripe of Arsenal fans that go to the Emirates for every game for the last god - knows - how - many years is that they have been paying the highest prices in the world, but have not been rewarded by the ambition of the club on the pitch.

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

Only God knows how many persons at the highest levels in Nigeria are parading certificates and qualifications that should form the subject of scrutiny.

God knows how many different diets there are — Low Carb, High Protein, South Beach, Paleo, Gluten Free, Blood Type, Macrobiotic, and on and on.