Not exact matches
The Republican Party's fast journey from debating
how to combat
human - caused climate
change to arguing that it does not exist is a story of big political money, Democratic hubris in the Obama years and a partisan chasm that grew over nine years like a crack in the Antarctic shelf, favouring extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric over co-operation and conciliation.
Then I saw
how Elon Musk invested his time and money into SpaceX, Tesla, and PayPal (all
human - driven companies that
change the world).
A first impression sets the stage for
how people view you in the future, and there's nothing you can do to
change that: This is a direct byproduct of the way the
human brain stores information.
As Liz Ryan, founder and CEO of consulting firm The
Human Workplace, writes in a post on LinkedIn, «
How are you ever going to increase your earnings if every time you
change jobs, you get a tiny raise over what they paid you at the last place?»
The report details
how climate
change affects
human health and can impact our future, but the question remains: What can we do about it?
I think the
human race and society —
how we govern,
how we raise our kids,
how we think,
how we communicate — is going to fundamentally
change well within the next 30 years.
Just look at these 11 eye - popping statistics on
how content and technology are
changing humans (as compiled in an infographic from WebDAM, below):
The concern is justified; smartphones are
changing how we relate to other
human beings, so it's reasonable to worry about
how they'll affect parenting.
We don't just work to protect the environment — we tap into the universal
human desire for self - determination, and work to
change how decisions are made in B.C. by answering questions like: Who gets to decide?
It means dealing with
how human drivers merge and
change lanes (badly),
how they make right and left turns in traffic (differently),
how they adapt to different weather conditions (inconsistently) and
how they obey speed limits, traffic lights and stop signs (sporadically).
The afternoon of GCUC Day One featured several presentations that focused on
how the
human factor and connections that are inherent in coworking can drive
change in cities and lives.
With no concept of
how civilized
human society behaves in the developed world, they bring their crass ignorance to the party and ruin it for all the other tranquillity - seeking customers who've parted with the same chunk of
change that they have.
«This is a systemic critique, pointing out
how the board must accept responsibility for excessive political spending, inadequate energy policy, our
changing climate, toxic hazards, and
human rights abuses,» Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow, said.
The theory behind it is simple: If Facebook has experimented on its users to find new and exciting ways to get us to use it in the way they'd prefer, we should also feel free to experiment on Facebook, and see if those experiments
change how we think about what we share with one of the biggest repositories of
human data in history.
Explaining to its shareholders
how it is addressing strategic risks linked to major environmental and social policy issues, such as climate
change and
human rights, is an important dialogue every corporation needs to engage in with its shareholders.
Context on not only
how businesses are impacted by
changing technologies, but also getting new contextual understanding of
how the individual buyer and
human experience is
changing.
You pointed to a dispute of
how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in
human DNA, But that article doesn't
change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.
So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of
how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «
human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't
change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't
change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
please explain
how you a little toy of a
human can effect your creator to the point that he would
change the plan he set in motion eons ago; do you truly believe yourself to be that imprortant to him?
And when you think others are stupid to be «religious»,
how stupid are you to limit yourself to this one planet, when there are billions up there, all connected by God's Galactic Internet, no big bang, no beginning, no end, forever, billions of souls traveling the ever -
changing universe, in and out of various
human - like bodies, on and off of different earth - like planets.
Yet
how can
human prayer possibly
change the mind of God, Who is eternal, all - knowing and all - powerful?
How has
human nature actually been
changed for the better?
Wisdom, cleverness, experience and psychological «know -
how» are all useful tools in dealing with
human situations, but unless they are used by love no situation is permanently
changed and no
human attitude radically altered.
Kindness: I want to consider
how my everyday decisions affect people around the world, and
change even my favorite habits should respect for my fellow
human beings compel me to do so.
At Key Stage 3 (age 11 to 13 +, Years 7 to 9) schools have to teach: that fertilisation in
humans and flowering plants is the fusion of a male and a female cell; about the physical and emotional
changes that take place during adolescence; about the
human reproductive system, including the menstrual cycle and fertilization;
how the foetus develops in the uterus, including the role of the placenta.
Though it is right to say that we find in the Bible the progressive revelation of God, it might be more accurate to say that the Bible shows
how patiently and mercifully God always works with men, adapting his instruction to the ever -
changing panorama of
human experience.
If our view of the
human person
changes, so will
how we speak of God as a person.
It just so turns out that once
humans know
how something actually works, they have the incredible ability to
change it to
how they see fit, as evidenced by the amazing piece of technology in front of your face.
Certainly fundamental
changes would be required of the churches if they were to do this: we would have to put truth before comfort; we would have to listen to the losers, the jobless, the homeless, the unsuccessful, the ostracized; we would have to leave the sanctuary and enter the marketplace, and learn through participation
how to contemplate the
human condition as Jesus did: with compassion.
Should climate
change be more fierce than we predict,
how shall the vast majority of
humans cope?
Critics such as James Burtchaell, whose book The Dying of the Light was reviewed in these pages by Ralph C. Wood (February 3 - 10), have simply not indicated realistically
how, in the face of massive
changes in society, church and
human knowledge, church - related colleges could have maintained their traditional church - relatedness in all its 19th - or early 20th - century glory.
How can we
change human nature?
you can have a court system that is supposed to deal non-violently with solutions to these dillimmas but mostely it is entertainment and laughable in it's core justice to begin with
humans are
human so
how does the newer muslim prophet propose to become more than
human in response to violence and as a tool for enactment for
change — if necessary?
i don't understand
how religious people find it so hard to accept we
changed over time and progressed on our own instead of believeing some all powerful, all knowing thing made
humans from dirt.
Modern economics is thc science of self - interest, of
how to best accommodate individual behavior by means of markets and the commodification of
human relations... In this economic world view, the traditional
human faculty of reason gets short -
changed and degraded to act as the servant of sensory desires.
Maybe there is something about Jesus being a
human that
changes how the spirit of God behaves.
We need a conceptuality that shows
how deeply
human beings are shaped by culture and
how much they
change as their cultures
change.
The appreciation of community
changes our basic sense of
how to improve the
human condition.
Since
human motives usually «come mixed,» only God is wise enough to judge
how much of this resistance to social
change is due to self - interest,
how much to the pull of tradition, and
how much to sincere Christian conviction.
We will better understand
how the media affect our values and worldview today if we see in perspective just
how much
changes in communication media have affected cultural values throughout
human history.
how selfish people LOVE to
change things to justify shirking responsibility and killing another
human life
@World..., I'm still trying to reconcile the statement,»... atheists want to take a limited 2000 or so year old childish concept of God and refute it...» with «Nothing has ever
changed about God, just
human ability to fully perceive and understand IT...» What is the «limited 2000... year old» concept of God that atheists want to refute and
how is it different from the current concept of God.
The Catholic Church hasn't officially defined
how the Biblical Account was made manifest in our world (heck, as soon as it tried, science would probably
change how humans evolved, so its kind of hard to reconcile Theology with a moving target).
Like most UN
human rights treaties, its implementation by state parties is overseen by a compliance committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which issues «General Comments» meant to guide our understanding of the provisions contained in the treaty, and which conducts periodic reviews of state parties, instructing them
how to
change their laws in order to comply better with the treaty, as understood by the Committee.
People love to shout about
how God never
changes, but they fail to realize that no
human understanding of God is (or can ever come close to) God.
In this age of rapid
change, and with our modern understanding of the
human condition, we can see
how much alters in a person's lifetime; we must remain open to what may come, and free to respond to new circumstances.
All them Northerners keep saying I can't keep slaves and saying
how public opinion is
changing towards owning
humans, but they can all just go with the flow if they like, i'll be staying alive swimming against the current for as long as my racist arms will carry me...
But
how do
humans respond to the need for
change?
... modalities, rules and guidelines as to
how, and which, additional
human - induced activities related to
changes in greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks in the agricultural soils and the land - use
change and forestry... shall be added or subtracted.
You only need read a typical sample of any club» s fan comments to see
how fans expect loyalty and call players «traitors» who exercise their
human rights to
change clubs (subject to existing contracts of course).