Sentences with phrase «how legal threats»

As plain packaged tobacco starts to appear on New Zealand shelves, two experts reflect on the process it's taken to get this far and how legal threats delayed policy by three years.

It finally appeared in the journal's June issue, but the whole affair has raised questions about how legal threats can impact the progress of psychological science.

Not exact matches

Legal expense insurance gains in popularity Reinsurance takes hard look at quake threats New pressures on Errors & Omissions could mean you wind up in court KPMG chats with Top Broker about its world view How identity theft victims» information is misused RSA helps entrepreneurs get social How to wow clients with a great meal and a touch of class

They anticipate how other organizations, from adoption agencies to churches, could risk similar legal threats.

In the face of legal threats and boardroom fainthearts, their mission was to disclose the truth about how the US government deceived America about the unwinnability of the Vietnam war.

Although Pokemon Go's popularity continues to wane, the mobile game's recent battle with PokéVision — the third - party Pokémon locator site — provides us with an important lesson on how the «game hack» can be a major threat to a game developers» business and a high risk endeavor with significant legal consequences for game hack developers.

Common Cause - one of the organizations to get these legal threats from ALEC over the «climate denial» exposure - has submitted detailed complaints to the IRS documenting how ALEC operations likely violate their nonprofit status.

This language reveals not only how legal peaceful protest in America is being criminalized — but also how it's being framed as a threat to national security.

It then identifies how this form of cognitive decisionmaking bias generates «cognitive illiberalism,» a legal and political decisionmaking bias that poses the same threat to constitutional freedoms as consciously illiberal forms of state action.

But, a basically aesthetic motivation that mostly matters to people who make up a tiny portion of the main users of the product (non-lawyers) that poses multiple threats to how statutes will be located using legal research tools, and how it will be interpreted once located, means that reorganizing statutes is not something to be done lightly.

The report, produced in association with Kroll, surveyed 138 GCs, legal directors and c - suite executives around the world to gauge their views on how corporates are responding to the rising threat of cyber-attacks — an issue that is becoming ever more prevalent in the wake of high - profile incidents such as the DLA Piper, Yahoo and Equifax hacks.

Corporate fraud legal firm Rahman Ravelli has advised businesses on how to spot money - laundering threats within an organisation and communicate concerns.

Armed with the knowledge of how little law firms might pay for offshore work, corporations can use the threat of cutting them out and sending legal tasks overseas on their own to force law firms to reduce fees.

«Say what you like, it's hard to deny that this is actively defrauding the copyright holders and if you had just bid hundreds of millions for the broadcast and later Internet rights to a major event how would YOU work to defend those rights and ensure that you could later monetize that content -LSB-...] Maybe the letter from Baker & McKenzie was the legal equivalent of a bull in the proverbial china shop, but I am just plain disappointed that the Boing Boing people have returned fire with its daft threats back to the law firm: «Baker & McKenzie, be on alert: henceforth, Boing Boing will be actively monitoring your website to identify dumbass activity and will, if necessary, take appropriate action to point out instances of wasting clients» money by sending out unnecessary and obnoxious warning letters.»

The report, produced in association with Kroll, surveyed 138 GCs, legal directors and c - suite executives around the world to gauge their views on how corporates are responding to cybersecurity threats, comparing and contrasting current practices in Europe, Latin America, Middle East, North America, Southeast Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and China.

As the legal industry is transformed, how can firms be agile and turn threats to traditional models into opportunities for innovative solutions?

The eight Tracks are focused on specific issues facing lawyers, such as the «Solo and Small Firm Track» (offering for example: «No Brainer «Sweet Spot» Tech for Solos and Small Firms»), Front Office Technology: The Lawyer's Desktop Track (offering for example: «Sharing Documents Securely with Clients, Lawyers and Others»), The Security and Threat Protection Track (offering: «What is an Appropriate Level of Protection and How to Achieve It») and the Innovation and Advanced Track (offering: «Emerging Canadian Legal Technology»).

So for legal professionals concerned about AI as a threat to humans, or uncertain of how best to use AI, the world of chess has a number of lessons to teach.

Navigant's global legal technology solutions information security team offers five simple tips on how organizations can develop a culture where every employee shares the responsibility to identify, prevent, and react to cyber threats.

* An unbiased overview of current legal technology products * Updated hardware and software recommendations for Windows and Mac - based systems * Step - by - step instructions for making sound technology decisions * How to choose the right operating system and software for your office, including case management applications, billing systems, and document management solutions * Determining what you need to go wireless * How to protect your firm from security threats, including viruses, spyware, and spam

Secretary Johnson's speech, «Addressing Existential Threats — Surviving Turbulent Times and Finding a Way Forward,» will discuss how the legal...

Legal expense insurance gains in popularity Reinsurance takes hard look at quake threats New pressures on Errors & Omissions could mean you wind up in court KPMG chats with Top Broker about its world view How identity theft victims» information is misused RSA helps entrepreneurs get social How to wow clients with a great meal and a touch of class

Washington, DC - Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney Julie Samuels will testify on how patent trolls harm start - ups and consumers through deceptive demand letters and legal threats at a US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing on Thursday, Nov. 7.

In this webinar, legal experts from Blakes Employment & Labour group discuss how you can mitigate insider threats for your organization by better understanding:

Outline when you'll make legal counsel available for sales associates and how you'll handle lawsuits, threats of action, arbitration, and code of ethics and license law violations.