The research is a good example of
how models and observations can be combined to provide new insights into wildfires, says Prof Guido van der Werf from Vrije University in the Netherlands, who was not involved in the study.
Not exact matches
Covering the period since 1950, the researchers show
how the science has leaped ahead thanks to computerisation, mathematical
modelling and new technologies of
observation.
Using geological
observation, laboratory impact experiments
and computer
modeling, Schultz
and Brown graduate student Stephanie Quintana have offered a new explanation for
how those streaks were formed.
Nadeau also studies the potential impacts of climate change on species around the globe, using
modeling, field
observation and experiments to predict where species are most vulnerable
and determine
how conservation groups can best mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on animal populations.
This
modeling would be aided by
observations that somehow capture the direction of the magnetic field within the CME as it leaves the sun
and by «a better understanding of
how the magnetic field will change
and evolve as the CME makes its multiday transit from the sun to Earth,» Viereck says.
While there are many debates in regards to
how the Earth's internal evolution is driven, the
model created by the team seemed to find an answer that better fits available
observations and underlying physics.
«However, knowing it will increase is one thing, but having a confident statement about
how much
and where as a function of location requires the
models do a better job of replicating
observations than they have.»
Using published data from the circumpolar arctic, their own new field
observations of Siberian permafrost
and thermokarsts, radiocarbon dating, atmospheric
modeling,
and spatial analyses, the research team studied
how thawing permafrost is affecting climate change
and greenhouse gas emissions.
Now, scientists have studied Vega with the CHARA interferometer, an array of telescopes in California yielding crisp views of stars,
and modeled the
observations by using new computations of
how fast - spinning stars age.
Likewise, while
models can not represent the climate system perfectly (thus the uncertainly in
how much the Earth will warm for a given amount of emissions), climate simulations are checked
and re-checked against real - world
observations and are an established tool in understanding the atmosphere.
«We compare
observations and models to figure out
how well our
models are performing, as well as
how we should interpret our space - based
observations.»
They then used the earlier
observations of the changing abundances of the three pairs of predators
and prey — leveraging data sets collected by other scientists — to show
how the
models would apply.
To get around the problem, Fasullo
and Trenberth decided to examine
how well 16 global climate
models reproduce recent satellite
observations of relative humidity in the tropics
and subtropics, a quantity that is directly related to cloud formation.
«It's also possible to determine
how many variables we should include in a mathematical
model whose aim is to reproduce the
observations and to predict the evolution of the system at hand.»
«Basically, we're taking satellite
observations that say it's getting darker
and taking a
model that simulates temperature
and snow morphology
and using that to calculate
how snowpack has evolved,» Doherty said.
Eri Saikawa, who studies air pollution
and its health impacts at Emory University,
and wasn't involved in the new study, plans to use Wiedinmyer's data in a
model to see
how it matches
observations in China
and Southeast Asia,
and to see
how trash burning might be contributing to the substantial amounts of air pollution there.
The VPL is based at the University of Washington,
and comprises researchers at 20 institutions working to understand
how telescopic
observations and modeling studies can determine if exoplanets are able to support life, or had life in the past.
«One of the big achievements of the project was a demonstration of
how models and field
observations are able to work together for mutual benefit,» Simmons said.
«As astrophysical
observations and simulations improve, we're doing increasingly precise comparisons between the
models of
how galaxies form
and the
observations of what galaxies actually look like,» Carroll says.
The
observations fit well with computer simulations,
and can be used to refine
models of
how large - scale patterns, such as the distributions of galaxies
and clusters of galaxies, came to be.
Though the scientists don't know if such individual
and pack behavior is a common occurrence,
observations like these on Isle Royale provide insight into
how animal societies function as well as the vicissitudes of the food chain cycle on Isle Royale, also helping to inform other
models of the natural world.
There are many other atmospheric
observations and models we need to look at to see
how this entire process works.»
Finally, special attention is paid to the difficulty of observing complex ices directly
and how gas
observations, experiments
and models help in constraining this ice chemistry stage.
This involves a combination of satellite
observations (when different satellites captured temperatures in both morning
and evening), the use of climate
models to estimate
how temperatures change in the atmosphere over the course of the day,
and using reanalysis data that incorporates readings from surface
observations, weather balloons
and other instruments.
These include using the same
model used to detect the planet instead to fit synthetic, planet - free data (with realistic covariance properties,
and time sampling identical to the real data),
and checking whether the «planet» is still detected; comparing the strength of the planetary signal with similar Keplerian signals injected into the original
observations; performing Bayesian
model comparisons between planet
and no - planet
models;
and checking
how robust the planetary signal is to datapoints being removed from the
observations.
In the future, further
observations of UGC 4703
and detailed
modeling of the system may help continue to puzzle out
how our own Magellanic clouds came about.
The
modeling efforts continue to be incredibly important because they tie our physics - based understanding of
how gravitational lensing works with the
observations of gravitational lensing,
and they allow astronomers to accurately search for
and study extremely distant
and lensed galaxies.
Over the last five years, the BAMS report has examined more than 100 events as part of a burgeoning sub-field of climate science that uses
observations and climate
models to show
how human - caused warming has already affected the odds or severity of many of the weather extremes we experience now.
The effort uses innovative ARM radar
observations from the MC3E field campaign to evaluate a series of high - resolution simulations, which results in an improved understanding of cloud transitions
and how to diagnose these transitions in
models.
The meeting presentations will focus on synergies among various approaches
and provide recommendations on
how to improve the use of earth
observations, ground data
and modeling techniques for the improved understanding of land use sources
and sinks.
This method tries to maximize using pure
observations to find the temperature change
and the forcing (you might need a
model to constrain some of the forcings, but there's a lot of uncertainty about
how the surface
and atmospheric albedo changed during glacial times... a lot of studies only look at dust
and not other aerosols, there is a lot of uncertainty about vegetation change, etc).
Scientists worldwide use the agency's field data, together with satellite
observations and computer
models, to tackle environmental challenges
and advance our knowledge of
how the Earth works as a complex, integrated system.
This new set of
observations adds key information to the
models needed to track
how material moves
and changes throughout space in the solar system — crucial to understanding the medium through which our spacecraft travel, as we venture farther
and farther from home.
Research ranged from qualitative to quantitative
and included classroom
observation, interviews with program participants
and managers,
and a survey to determine
how valuable each participant's relationship to his or her
model teacher or mentor was in preparing them to teach.
Though interviews
and observations on SUTD's campus, Fisher has learned a lot about
how education
models move
and adapt between cultures.
No matter
how you mix it, it's better to go with Value - Added, student surveys, or both: As Dropout Nation noted last year, the accuracy of classroom
observations is so low that even in a multiple measures approach to evaluation in which value - added data
and student surveys account for the overwhelming majority of the data culled from the
model (72.9 percent,
and 17.2 percent of the evaluation in one case), the classroom
observations are of such low quality that they bring down the accuracy of the overall performance review.
The magnitude it actually had actually risen,
how different these temperatures were from the 1940s, the conflict between
model prediction / theory
and observation, etc, were the issues the satellite data raised.
We have many studies presenting the projections from GCMs under various forcing scenarios where unforced variability is simulated,
and we have a few studies (not many I think) which have a
model reproduce the * actual * forcings
and unforced variability
and see
how well the output matches
observations (a recent one by Yu Kosaka
and Shang - Ping Xie being a case in point).
What you do test is the parts of the
model,
how they interact,
and how they match in behavior with
observations (of which we need more
and better also).
Although a useful process to see which
models should have more weight,
and which ones should be discarded all together, the average that the ensemble produces will automatically have a higher correlation with
observation data simply because of
how far a set of numbers are spread out from each other.
How should one make graphics that appropriately compare
models and observations?
BVP simulations do not have such a dependence
and have stable statistics regardless of
how they are initialised (at least for IC perturbations within the range of actual
observations and for the class of
model that was used for AR4).
Additionally, if the
observations are not correct,
how can the changes to the
models, methods
and application procedures be correct?
Some of them are optimal fingerprint detection studies (estimating the magnitude of fingerprints for different external forcing factors in
observations,
and determining
how likely such patterns could have occurred in
observations by chance,
and how likely they could be confused with climate response to other influences, using a statistically optimal metric), some of them use simpler methods, such as comparisons between data
and climate
model simulations with
and without greenhouse gas increases / anthropogenic forcing,
and some are even based only on
observations.
[Response: As a modeler of the deep sediment column, I go to talks about
observations of the real world (geology, in other words),
and am struck by
how simplistic the
models are.
Notice
how the
model starts below obs in 1880
and ends above obs in 2014
and at no time does the
model remain above
observations.
The researchers focused on comparing
model projections
and observations of the spatial
and seasonal patterns of
how energy flows from Earth to space.
«However, knowing it will increase is one thing, but having a confident statement about
how much
and where as a function of location requires the
models do a better job of replicating
observations than they have.»
The differences arise from
how gaps in
observations are filled in time
and space,
and the reanalyses do this most comprehensively by utilizing all kinds of data as well as using ocean
models to span gaps.
To analyze
how Mount Pinatubo affected the global sea level, the researchers created
model simulations
and applied natural factors to them for
observation.