Sentences with phrase «how much this interpretation»

If I were writing a book on Whitehead I should put forward and discuss how much this interpretation was a distortion of Whitehead; I don't believe there is any other view as definite as this that can be got out of him.

Not exact matches

While the book has weak points — most notably regarding Isaac Backus, the 18th - century baptist minister and author of the important treatise Government and Liberty Described and Ecclesiastical Tyranny Exposed (1778)-- who appears and then disappears without much clarity on how he fits the argument — it is generally an incisive interpretation.

I love how some take the words of one supposed «theologian» to another and then tells everyone not to listen to their pastor who has probably had as much experience (if not more) with biblical interpretation than this author.

Try doing research on canon law and see how of it is based on the Bible vs how much is based on divine inspiration and interpretation of pope's and cardinals.

But it does show how much Biblical interpretation has changed, because the scriptural point that made them pacifist was «thou shalt not kill», which they felt applied to war.

This person had no idea how much hell I've taken from people in my evangelical community for writing about my doubts, my questions related to heaven and hell, my views on biblical interpretation and theology, and my support for women in ministry and other marginalized people in the Church.

The people whose interpretations of experience we are studying are not Trobiand Islanders, but Jews of the first - century Mediterranean world; to understand how they interpret their lives, we need to learn as much as possible about the properly historical realities within which they lived: the social and symbolic worlds of Roman rule, Hellenistic culture, and a variegated Judaism.

In place of one individual's interpretation of Christ we have a tradition which shines like a shaft of light through the refracting, expanding prism of a rich and varied religious experience, and by its many - splendored radiance begins to prove how much was contained in the apparently simple and single, but really complex and manifold, manifestation of the divine mystery — the revelation of the mystery hid from past ages, the message of God through Jesus Christ, his Son, our Lord.

Interpretations can be assessed based on how much of the story and of the author's context that interpretation has a coherent relationship to.

This underutilization seems to have been due largely to the lack of much catechesis — clergy that is interpretation to clergy and laity of the hymnbook committees» decisions and of how to use the books.

I am shocked by the Christian teachings that instruct people specifically «how» to study God's Word in the «right» way — «how much time to spend» praying and studying the Bible — «how» to come to the «right» interpretation of each Scripture verse / passage (guided by them — tying the hands of God and Jesus» Holy Spirit, and ignoring that God's Word is living and active...)-- insistence that increased Bible study, prayer and intersession, by their sheer weight, automatically make us closer to being better Christians — closer to perfection and more pleasing to our Lord and Savior.

To say with such conviction that no Democrat will enter Heaven... based on YOUR interpretation of what God's holy nature is... based on a Book (no matter how much instruction and wisdom it may provide... without, it seems to me, using your own intellect to delve deeper into the whole of it... is in my opinion the sign of a Believer with a Giant Sequoia in his eye and teaching with his finger.

Under the rubrics «oral interpretation,» «expression,» and «elocution,» this performance studies has had much to say on how a preacher might improve his or her skill in the oral presentation of Biblical texts in Christian worship.

What strikes me on rereading that exchange is how much their debate hinged on a proper interpretation of Milton, with Fish insisting on the same views now developed at fuller length in How Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a reasoned decision.&raqhow much their debate hinged on a proper interpretation of Milton, with Fish insisting on the same views now developed at fuller length in How Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a reasoned decision.&raqHow Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a reasoned decision.»

But, Biblical interpretation aside, I feel it is foolish to place so much emphasis on 5 verses, when there is an entire Bible FULL of chapters and passages all about how we are to relate to each other.

It's not so much the apparent cynicism of the advice on how to manage the process, or even the reference to Hutton (which might be Brooks» interpretation rather than a direct reference by Blair) but the crushing, ghastly, inescapable lack of judgement.

«If we know how volcanic sulfur particles affect the atmospheric winds, we can have a much improved interpretation of the traces of volcanic activities in the ice cores,» says Dr. Toohey.

We may be able to predict their responses pretty well, pretty often, but the reasons we ascribe to their actions are very much based on our interpretations of how things work.

Because illustrators know how much hard work goes into reconstructing a dinosaur for the first time, they respect each other's original interpretations.

If you've read some of my other posts, you probably know how much I value these off - beat glimpses at the otherwise relatively mundane, and our Tugger video is maybe the most literal interpretation of that so far.

If you believe that 2012 was actually not meant to be the end of the world, as per the erroneous interpretation of the Mayan calendar, but rather to signify a paradigm shift as we move into the coming age, an age some say will bring enlightenment, then you can see how much potential we all hold in the palm of our hand in this moment.

Savasana: End with Jack Kornfield's interpretation of Buddha: In the end only 3 things matter, how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how much you were able to let go of what was not meant for you.

I really appreciate how much work and thought you put into these topics, and especially how you encourage readers to consider the science and fully understanding the proper interpretations of experiments & data, etc..

How do you describe something to someone with enough details to help them picture it but without giving too much away so as to not limit or intrude on their own free imagination / interpretation?

The cast and crew mostly discuss how much different this take is from previous interpretations, and the casting of Downey is also heavily touted.

For all the dead - on jabs at society, bystanders debating the political theories of intervention as two people beat each other's brains out, or the sang - froid meeting in the penthouse debating how best to dispose of the rebellion's wild - eyed ringleader (Luke Evans), there are tantalizing riffs whose interpretation is as much about our own pre-conceived notions as anything else.

Having since read both Alice books numerous times throughout the years and returned to Disney's interpretation often, I still find myself impressed with how much of the film works.

My expectation is that those without prior knowledge could potentially enjoy Spike's interpretation of the events (though Copley could single - handedly tank that possibility), but all you're doing is robbing yourself of a much better film, especially considering how much better the twists are in the original Korean.

For example, although it retains NCLB's requirement that all public schools conduct mandatory annual reading and math assessments for students in grades 3 - 8, ESSA gives states much greater abilities to establish their own interpretation of how good is good enough, and which schools should be called out as deficient and required to improve.

So basically, the argument here is that technical analysis won't help you much due to how much it relies on your interpretation of how stock prices are going to behave.

However, if some strange interpretation is required which ignores the lump sum and wants to know how much you need in the present to pay the loan while being able to make 8 % on the stock market that can be done.

HANS ULRICH OBRIST: How much control does the artist have in the interpretation of his work?

Having two nearby cores has allowed confidence in the interpretation of the last 115,000 years, though the lack of agreement between them during the last warm period 130,000 to 117,000 years ago has raised some questions about how much fluctuation there was in that warm period.

While some costs can be established with a fair amount of certainty, other amounts are open to interpretation: for example, how does one place a monetary value on the permanent disfigurement of a face, or evaluate how much money a student would have earned in the workforce if not for a brain injury suffered, perhaps, in a car accident?

So much for homogeneous interpretation... It would be interested to see how the EFTA Court would react if asked to rule again on the same question as in the (in) famous L'Oréal Norge saga.

How much broader that protection will be is yet to be shaped by the judiciary's interpretation of the Actavis v Eli Lilly judgment in future cases.

Although much of the detail of the precise operation of the lists is yet to be confirmed, it is difficult to see how some of the scheme (in SVGA 2006, Pts 1 and 2 of Sch 3) can be said to be compatible with the interpretation of Art 6 given in Wright.

Because the value of damages is subjective and open to interpretation, you may help from an experienced personal injury lawyer to understand how much money you may be entitled to.

Please check back with us to see how the U.S. Supreme Court decides these issues of critical important to ESA jurisprudence, namely how to interpret the critical habitat provisions of the ESA and how much deference to give to the Service's interpretation of those provisions.

These three Justices suggested that, if federal agency interpretations are so easily manipulated, perhaps the Supreme Court should reconsider how much deference the courts should be required to give them.

[17] Wade MacLauchlan «Judicial Review of Administrative Interpretations of Law: How Much Formalism Can We Reasonably Bear?»

Karakatsanis J. points to multiple features of the elaborate statutory scheme that might be said to support the alternative interpretation and explains how each of them is nonetheless consistent with the Board's interpretation (if one can call it that), much of which is supported by reference to a decision made by another body that «formerly» had appellate jurisdiction from the Board (at para. 44).

Regardless of how much insurance is applied for, whether life or disability, or requested by the business, an insurance company will approve a key man policy based on their interpretation of the true risk exposure.

With a complicated enough financial situation, 10 tax accountants will likely have 10 different returns, because not only is one variable how they interpret the code but also how you decide to interpret it, there will be multiple situations where the accountant will advise you on the possibilities of getting an audit, ask you how much risk tolerance you have for the different interpretations of different situations and how likely you would be to pass or fail an audit and warnings that if you fail it you will not only owe the difference in taxes but likely the penalties and interests accrued which could be over multiple years if the return gets pulled years later.