Each simulation is «ran» in isolation how daylight effects CFD or
how natural ventilation may decrease indoor air quality is not considered in these programs.
When staff know how to use systems or understand
how the natural ventilation is supposed to work then they can improve the overall efficiency of the building by adhering to instructions.
Not exact matches
Brown wants to figure out
how to use more
natural ventilation to cool hospitals and reduce their energy footprint.
I became a bit obsessed with the Terry Thomas Building, as perhaps the best example of
how you design a new building to work like an old building, an «O» building with lots of
natural light,
ventilation and almost no green gizmos, yet still using half the energy of a conventional building.
It's not clear
how the building will achieve the «efficient lighting, heating, and cooling» it says it will have, but for the pictures it's pretty obvious the presence of beautiful
natural light and
ventilation.
But
how does
natural ventilation fare when subjected to the same degree of scrutiny, and can it work in low energy buildings?
And while they are at it,
how about demanding
natural ventilation and getting rid of radiator fin balconies without thermal breaks.