I understand this perception and it's not without some basis in the actual reality of
how nonscientists argue.
Not exact matches
(I just noticed
how scary that phrase — a fairly simple cloning project — might sound to
nonscientists, like «a basic nuclear missile strike.»)
Most scientists have no experience discussing their research with
nonscientists, but it's important that they learn
how.
I have actually had science writers who are
nonscientists say that they felt their status as laymen made it easier to relate to their audience, while I have had science journalists who are scientists claim they don't see
how one could be effective without experience as a scientist.