I can't see
how ocean temps could be mined for chronologically useful information, unlike ice cores.
Not exact matches
I am also interested in
how long is required for the surface
temp to «achieve» 95 % of the ECS change: e.g. if climate sensitivity is 2K,
how much time is required for the surface
temp to increase by 1.9 K; and then
how much longer for the deep
oceans to increase by 1.9 K (or whatever 95 % of the projected increase in deep
ocean temperature works out to.)
Other than the fact that CO2 is necessary to human survival (we breathe it out after processing hydrocarbon food) and for 98 % of the energy that has allowed us to live longer and improve the standard of living over the last 300 years, just why exactly do we even care
how much CO2 is in the air, especially if the
temp of the
ocean which is dictated by the sun, will dictate the air
temp.
QUESTION: Do we know
how fresh water runoff effects the
Oceans temps?
The recent study concerning
ocean temperatures, and
how the Argo
temps had to be «adjusted» to fit the historic ship
temps is a concern to me.
Ocean temp data before fairly recent times is sparse at best, so I wonder
how much confidence we can really place in it anyway.
The question was that — if surface
temp are not increasing
how does that continue to cause an increase in
ocean temp.
Also don't understand
how surface
temps can be used to calculate global warming or cooling when the vast majority of climate heat is stored in the
oceans.
I am also interested in
how long is required for the surface
temp to «achieve» 95 % of the ECS change: e.g. if climate sensitivity is 2K,
how much time is required for the surface
temp to increase by 1.9 K; and then
how much longer for the deep
oceans to increase by 1.9 K (or whatever 95 % of the projected increase in deep
ocean temperature works out to.)