The research team now plans to apply their method to the study of deep - sea temperatures elsewhere to investigate
how orbital changes affected the climate in different parts of the world.
Not exact matches
This illustrates
how technology
changes, specifically low cost
orbital launches, pose a problem for which current international treaties don't cover.
The power law model population is dependent on four key parameters:
How fast the number of planets changes with planet mass, how fast the number of planets changes with orbital distance, the outer-most orbital distance at which a planet can be detected, and the combination of mass and orbital distance that produces the most planets (the «pivot point»
How fast the number of planets
changes with planet mass,
how fast the number of planets changes with orbital distance, the outer-most orbital distance at which a planet can be detected, and the combination of mass and orbital distance that produces the most planets (the «pivot point»
how fast the number of planets
changes with
orbital distance, the outer-most
orbital distance at which a planet can be detected, and the combination of mass and
orbital distance that produces the most planets (the «pivot point»).
Students can begin by viewing
how the Sun impacts the Earth, and then
change the mass of the Sun and Earth separately to see
how even small
changes can greatly affect
orbital patterns.
When we do, no matter
how good the climate model is it will not be able to overcome deficiencies in our ability to predict the things that affect climate — solar activity, ocean cycles, etc — and it will not be able to overcome deficiencies in our understanding of
how things that affect climate actually work — solar activity, Earth
orbital changes, etc..
How about small
orbital parameter
changes, like Milankovitch's theory?
Kukla showed
how past
changes in
orbital cycles very slightly altered the amount of solar energy hitting the Earth, leading to past glacial and interglacial periods.
It's also «UNKNOWN»
how much of the historical temperature
changes have been due to GTGs, and
how much has been due to
orbital forcing, ie, increases in solar radiation, or perhaps long - term shifts in ocean circulation.»
We know
how the planets behave in relation to the sun and to each other today, but venturing millions or billions of years into the past, it can be tricky to figure out what
orbital changes may have impacted the Earth's climate.
wili, I've often pondered about the ice age cycles,
how a bit - o - carbon equivalent in
orbital changes can cause a 100ppm increase in atmospheric carbon.
Besides demonstrating his firm grasp of the power of these various factors to
change temperatures, this remarkable matching of theory to real - world data also tells us just
how ornery the climate beast may be: the
orbital changes that paced the ice ages were incredibly small.