This post is, like the majority of posts on RealClimate, not about «views what should be done», but analysis of
how the planetary climate system works and what consequences we can expect from our collective actions.
Not exact matches
The section of the «Impossible is a Dare» chapter that proves we already know
how to turn hunger and poverty into sufficiency, war into peace, and catastrophic
climate change into
planetary balance
«The result is not a surprise, but if you look at the global
climate models that have been used to analyze what the planet looked like 20,000 years ago — the same models used to predict global warming in the future — they are doing, on average, a very good job reproducing
how cold it was in Antarctica,» said first author Kurt Cuffey, a glaciologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and professor of geography and of earth and
planetary sciences.
Dr Nathan Mayne, Senior Lecturer in Astrophysics at the University of Exeter and one of the authors of the study said: «This research is not only important in developing our understanding of this exotic class of planets, but also represents the first steps to building a deeper understanding of
how planetary atmospheres and
climates work across a range of conditions, including those more conducive to life.
Elisabetta Pierazzo of the
Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona, and colleagues used a global
climate model to study
how water vapour and sea salt thrown up from an impact will affect ozone levels for years after the event.
«The tropical Pacific ocean - atmosphere system has been called a sleeping dragon because of
how it can influence
climate elsewhere,» said lead author Aradhna Tripati, a UCLA assistant professor in the departments of Earth,
planetary and space sciences, and atmospheric and oceanic sciences.
The Coming «Instant
Planetary Emergency»
How will
climate change affect the future of the planet?
Forget
climate change, has anyone even consider a back of the envelope calculation on
how much longer the
planetary auto - catalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons can occur?
Now it's time to try and make sense of what actually happened, who did what, and
how the results will shape our troubled relationship with the
planetary climate.
As Andy heads abroad for a conference on «
planetary emergencies», I'll be bringing you occasional updates from the consumptive heart of the nation's desert West, Las Vegas, where clean energy prophets and political luminaries are gathered to discuss
how the imperatives of
climate change, fossil fuel scarcity and national security ought to reshape our energy future.
With or without global warming, there's a solid argument that improved understanding of
planetary dynamics, particularly the
climate system, is essential to sustaining human progress given
how risks rise as populations expand, build, farm and concentrate in zones that are implicitly vulnerable to hard knocks like floods, droughts, heat and severe storms.
But
climate change is a
planetary problem, and it's not easy to capture its dynamics in one photograph, no matter
how wide - angle the lens.
Your spurious sarcasm language aside the increase in knowledge about
climate science over the last 25 years has been truly impressive (for example our understanding of
how the increased heat retention gets moved around the
planetary system).
Listening to Navarro Llanos describe Bolivia's perspective, I began to understand
how climate change — if treated as a true
planetary emergency akin to those rising flood waters — could become a galvanizing force for humanity, leaving us all not just safer from extreme weather, but with societies that are safer and fairer in all kinds of other ways as well.
Then I explained
how I read in 1999 my first book on
climate change, Laboratory Earth: The
Planetary Gamble We Can't Afford to Lose by the late Dr. Stephen Schneider of Stanford University.
Thus the two types of energy exchange are governed by different rules and it is the failure to realise
how the two sets of rules interact within a
planetary atmosphere that has caused
climate science to get bogged down in a conceptual impasse.
The same is true of «we're just recovering from the LIA» and «It's
planetary cycles» hypotheses — each fails to explain critical components of
how the Earth's
climate is changing.
The first, in September covered
how we are influencing
planetary climate processes.
If you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that it is «virtually certain» that human activities, primarily the increase in CO2 concentrations, is altering the
climate in a measurable way, then there's no other conclusion possible: you are a scientifically illiterate moron, with absolutely no concept of
how even the simplest model of a
planetary atmosphere works.
Professor Solomon Hsiang and colleagues described in the journal Nature in 2011
how they had investigated whether anything linked «
planetary - scale
climate changes with global patterns of civil conflict».
I think we have all heard enough about this subject but I've got to deal with it first before I go on to explain
how misleading I believe the concept to have been ever since it was first used in connection with
planetary climates.
This is
how we can calibrate past
climate indices and the potential
planetary relationships have tantalisingly close correspondences and offer potentially strong predictive power if we can crack the code.
-- John Rowley, founder / editor www.peopleandplanet.net «Lester Brown has produced another «
planetary survey» book that tells us
how to get off the wrecking train we are on by courtesy of a dozen environmental assaults such as
climate change.
«Lester Brown has produced another «
planetary survey» book that tells us
how to get off the wrecking train we are on by courtesy of a dozen environmental assaults such as
climate change.
The head of The
Planetary Society and former Boeing engineer released a new book last month called Unstoppable, which outlines
how the current generation of young people — dubbed the «Next Great Generation» — can use science to curb
climate change within their lifetime.
The report — Europe's Share of the
Climate Challenge: Domestic Actions and International Obligations to Protect the Planet — takes a close look at Europe, showing exactly how it can show leadership in keeping global climate change within the necessary planetary
Climate Challenge: Domestic Actions and International Obligations to Protect the Planet — takes a close look at Europe, showing exactly
how it can show leadership in keeping global
climate change within the necessary planetary
climate change within the necessary
planetary limits.
Three - dimensional (3D)
planetary general circulation models (GCMs) derived from the models that we use to project 21st Century changes in Earth's
climate can now be used to address outstanding questions about
how Earth became and remained habitable despite wide swings in solar radiation, atmospheric chemistry, and other
climate forcings; whether these different eras of habitability manifest themselves in signals that might be detected from a great distance; whether and
how planets such as Mars and Venus were habitable in the past;
how common habitable exoplanets might be; and
how we might best answer this question with future observations.