In this on - demand webcast, panelists discuss real - life scenarios on
how predictive coding is being used to drive down e-discovery costs.
In this on - demand webcast, panelists discuss
how predictive coding can help e-discovery teams (legal, IT and records management) lower e-discovery costs.
As you can probably already tell there is a fair amount of technological sophistication (and some dreaded math) underlying
how predictive coding works.
In this episode of The Digital Detectives, Sharon Nelson and John Simek discuss the evolution of e-discovery,
how predictive coding works and is priced, and examples of cases that have involved predictive coding.
I'm currently working on a large matter in Australia that involves testifying to
how the predictive coding was applied and the validity of the results.
Not exact matches
This is
how we can calibrate past climate indices and the potential planetary relationships have tantalisingly close correspondences and offer potentially strong
predictive power if we can crack the
code.
Can you tell our listeners what is technology assisted review and
how is it different from
predictive coding or computer assisted
coding?
This was the first time this client had used
predictive coding, and illustrates
how it can benefit any size matter when applied strategically.
technology assisted review and
how is it different from
predictive coding or computer assisted
coding?
His primary focus in recent months has been on the UX for Lexis DiscoveryIQ, a new eDiscovery enterprise software platform from LexisNexis that reimagines
how and when
predictive coding is used in the workflow.
Predictive Analytics (also called «
Predictive Coding» or «Technology Assisted Review») is a workflow that requires a subject matter expert to review a small subset of documents in order to train the system on what the human is looking for until the system can statistically «predict»
how the human would
code the rest of the collection.
How some practitioners are already expanding
predictive coding outside the legal e-discovery bubble
During an interview with Law Technology News, Tom Groom discusses
how using
predictive coding or technology assisted review (TAR) «can be an incredible cost - and time - saver» for legal teams, but it is not «an easy button.»
Whether we call these software programs «
predictive coding,» «technology - assisted review» or something else entirely,
how do you know that they are right for you as a cautious and risk - averse in - house lawyer?
Those who doubt the reliability — and I would argue inevitability — of
predictive coding could learn a lesson from
how Wall Street automates trading.
If you are among those attending the annual conference this week of the International Legal Technology Association, you could have a shot at winning $ 100 cash on the spot and other technology products — and also learn
how Catalyst's Insight Predict gives you the power to succeed with e-discovery search and review like no other
predictive coding tool.
Yet in conversation corporate counsel and law firm attorneys express the need to cut through the hype and understand
how to use and defend
predictive coding.
When
predictive coding first emerged there was a great deal of anticipation among legal practitioners on
how courts would respond.
Before we dive into the specifics of
how exactly
predictive coding works, we need to first address the name.