Sentences with phrase «how previous warm»

Scientists are learning about how previous warm periods altered sea levels, and what that past may tell us about the future.

Not exact matches

Swann's previous research looked at how a hypothetical massive tree planting in the Northern Hemisphere to slow global warming could have the unintended effect of changing tropical rainfall.

The study examined 27 years worth of satellite data for sea surface temperatures, previous coral bleaching events, and studied how corals responded to different seawater warming conditions.

This goes against previous notions of how rainfall should respond to atmospheric warming.

-- http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/9/12/124002/article «It is known that carbon dioxide emissions cause the Earth to warm, but no previous study has focused on examining how long it takes to reach maximum warming following a particular CO2 emission.

Previous releases include the Palme d'Or winning BLUE IS THE WARMEST COLOR; Cristian Mungiu's double Cannes Prize winner BEYOND THE HILLS; Abbas Kiarostami's LIKE SOMEONE IN LOVE and CERTIFIED COPY; the Oscar - nominated documentaries FINDING VIVIAN MAIER, DIRTY WARS, and HOW TO SURVIVE A PLAGUE; Wim Wender's PINA, Werner Herzog's CAVE OF FORGOTTEN DREAMS, Cindy Meehl's BUCK; and the Dardennes Brothers THE KID WITH A BIKE and Oscar - nominated TWO DAYS, ONE NIGHT.

Again, as in other previous Geoff Kersey exercises I wanted to truly understand how he managed to suggest so much detail through his careful placement of warm colours, and created the shapes of the path disappearing into the woods with rough purple shadows.

We know there have been previous ice ages and subsequent warming cycles; we know when they were, and how much time elapsed between them.

Whereas some meteorologists believe that there is not a link between gobal warming and storms, there has also been a recent model study on how the storm statistics can be affected by a global warming that we failed to mention in the previous discussion.

Edward Lendner, who was director of climate issues in a previous White House administration, wrote last week: «In what would be the single most important contingency that could impact civil society in the United States and other nations around the world, there is no agreed upon plan for how to deal with a collapsing world in the distant future if climate change and global warming get out of control and mass migrations northward create chaos in both wealthy and poor countries.»

In my previous blog post, I showed how one anonymous op - ed writer tried to casually drop the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase into his piece to insinuate skeptic climate scientists received illicit industry money in exchange for the promise to lie to the public.

Despite the many inaccuracies of his previous film, in an interview last year Gore still insisted that he «underestimated» how bad global warming is.

Most previous models have focused how warming air melts ice - sheets and glaciers from the top - down.

The previous Real Climate post has a nauseatingly smug description of how there is no pause — warming continues unabated since 1998!

Previous posts have discussed the 2 century long... Continue reading How warm was the world in July, amidst the historic heat waves?

In a previous post we discussed how the argument that the Earth has stopped warming doesn't make much sense because the people claiming this don't know how to draw their «system boundaries» correctly - how can you work out whether the Earth is warming if you don't take account of all the places where it may be warming?

How can you have a «quantifiable» explanation for warming when you lack any understanding of what caused previous warming?

-- IPCC has been clear in its wording — no «coffee pauses» were postulated, but a clear warming of 0.2 C per decade was projected by the models for «he next two decades» in AR4 (and a warming of 0.15 C to 0.3 C per decade in the previous TAR)-- In AR4 Ch.10, Figure 10.4 and Table 10.5, IPCC show us how the projected warming of the early decades ties into the longer - term forecast for the entire century, IOW the warming of the early decades is an integral part of the «entire postulated journey»..

I mean if, as Nurse is now suggesting, the scientific mainstream understanding of global warming is that it's happening but that it's open to debate how significant it is then doesn't this completely contradict pretty much everything he, the Royal Society, and its two previous presidents Lords Rees and May have been doing this last decade or more to stoke up the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare for all they'rewarming is that it's happening but that it's open to debate how significant it is then doesn't this completely contradict pretty much everything he, the Royal Society, and its two previous presidents Lords Rees and May have been doing this last decade or more to stoke up the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare for all they'reWarming scare for all they're worth?

That is, as also seen in previous studies (Qu et al. 2014; Zhou et al. 2015), how TLC reflection covaries with temperature in simulations of the present climate is a strong indicator of a model's TLC feedback under global warming.

How about: «Previous IPCC reports have discussed # multi-proxy climate reconstructions demonstrating that present - day mean northern hemispheric temperature is significantly warmer than during the MWP.

Do we know by how much CO2 concentrations increased during the similar previous warmings, such as the Roman and Medieval warm periods?

If the previous models are unskilled at predicting the current hiatus in surface warming and this is really because the warming has gone into the oceans then exactly how long will this take to come back and bite us in the bum?

Dr. Durack also indicates that previous studies have pointed towards the underestimation of ocean warming but this is the first study, which found how much the underestimation was.

Since you mention the subject, I was wondering if Dr. Curry could take a look at the «the authoritative Met Office «HADCRUT4» surface record» mentioned in David Rose's latest Mail article and explain how it justifies her «The record warm years of 2015 and 2016 were primarily caused by the super El Nino» remark quoted in his previous one:

It would require a simulation to see how the modern warming would affect there proxy reconstruction if it had occurred in a previous time period.

If AGW means the seas are getting consistently warmer, how come there was * more * ice late last winter than in the previous ten years?

If we can't concede something so basic and fundamental to science (you do not, under any circumstances, publish a graph that is knowingly in error) then how are we possibly going to trust those same principles with things that aren't nearly as cut and dry (oh say things like the use of «novel» statistics to overstate one's case on previous temperatures or «novel» statistics that spread warming from one side of the Antarctic to the other)?

'' Since this heat wave broke the previous record by 5 °C, global warming can't have much to do with it since that has been only 1 °C over the 20th century» LOL [laughing out loud] Any excuse, no matter how contorted the logic.

Entertaining how the NRDC played a role of some sort with one of the global warming nuisance lawsuits, the Connecticut v American Electric Power, while another of those global warming nuisance lawsuits, Comer v. Murphy Oil had wording within its documents stating «The API [American Petroleum Institute] and other Oil Company Defendants have engaged in concerted financial activity — far in excess of $ 1 million — in furtherance of a tortious civil conspiracy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — details I described in my previous blog post.

Previous studies, including those used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), tended to underestimate the impact shrinking ice sheets and other changes to land had on how much heat was radiated back to space as conditions warmed.

There is still work to be done in here, and I hadn't even styled the tables when I took photos because I was too excited, but I'm loving how these chairs look in here and how the colours have warmed up the space while making it look bigger because they're shorter and leggier than the previous chairs.